George Groves vs. David Brophy - April 9th 2016
-
wesshaw1985
- Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
George Groves vs. David Brophy - April 9th 2016
Eddie Hearn @EddieHearn - 29 minutes ago
Delighted to add @StGeorgeGroves to the party on the huge April 9 night taking on 17-0 Scotland's @David_Brophy @SauerlandBros
Delighted to add @StGeorgeGroves to the party on the huge April 9 night taking on 17-0 Scotland's @David_Brophy @SauerlandBros
Last edited by wesshaw1985 on 09 Apr 2016, 08:58, edited 3 times in total.
Re: Next For George Groves?
Get him in with jamie cox eliminator for either WBA or WBO
Re: Next For George Groves?
Yes, that fight would give him a nice little title to defend against some British fighters.wesshaw1985 wrote:After stopping Di Luisa, who should be next on Groves radar?
Cant see him going straight into a title shot so another building fight, I'd go for Giovanni De Carolis for the WBA 'regular' Title...
-
wesshaw1985
- Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Next For George Groves?
Or a step toward Fedor Chudinov and the WBA Super Title.Horse wrote:Yes, that fight would give him a nice little title to defend against some British fighters.wesshaw1985 wrote:After stopping Di Luisa, who should be next on Groves radar?
Cant see him going straight into a title shot so another building fight, I'd go for Giovanni De Carolis for the WBA 'regular' Title...
Then onto unification fights with either Arthur Abraham or the Badou Jack and James DeGale rematches...
Re: Next For George Groves?
I think Groves could beat Chudinov now. I don't think Groves is the fight he was but Chudinov is bang average although tough.
Re: Next For George Groves?
I clicked on Rohan Murdoch by mistake. I thought it said Rupert Murdoch. I f*cking hate that c*nt ![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Next For George Groves?
SnapTaansend wrote:I clicked on Rohan Murdoch by mistake. I thought it said Rupert Murdoch. I f*cking hate that c*nt
Re: Next For George Groves?
He should try and reverse the brutal defeat to "Male Pattern Baldness".
Re: Next For George Groves?
That'd be a good scrap.no1man wrote:Get him in with jamie cox eliminator for either WBA or WBO
Re: Next For George Groves?
Cox doesn't deserve it.palooka wrote:That'd be a good scrap.
He should give Sai a rematch.
Re: Next For George Groves?
That'd be in an ideal world though hasn't Cox moved up in weight?Horse wrote:Cox doesn't deserve it.palooka wrote:That'd be a good scrap.
He should give Sai a rematch.
Re: Next For George Groves?
Yes, but they should still try to make the fight.palooka wrote:That'd be in an ideal world though hasn't Cox moved up in weight?
If Sai says no then fair enough.
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9007
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: Next For George Groves?
George seems to be a stuck in a rut: he is not good enough to be world class, but he's better than domestic level & probably slightly better than European level, so where does he go?
There's no point in him knocking over any more corpses, as that doesn't prove anything, but I can't see him beating any trinket holders.
A rematch with DeGale is an obvious choice & I suppose DeGale would want to even the score, but I can't see Groves beating DeGale now.
There's no point in him knocking over any more corpses, as that doesn't prove anything, but I can't see him beating any trinket holders.
A rematch with DeGale is an obvious choice & I suppose DeGale would want to even the score, but I can't see Groves beating DeGale now.
Last edited by Syntax Error on 31 Jan 2016, 11:06, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Next For George Groves?
Groves is good enough for world class. He is world class.Syntax Error wrote:George seems to be a stuck in a rut: he is not good enough to be world class, but he's better than domestic level & probably slightly better than European level, so where does he go?
He could beat any of them. DeGale is the best trinket holder and he's already beaten him.Syntax Error wrote:There's no point in him knocking over any more corpses, as that doesn't prove anything, but I can't see him beating any trinket holders.
I can.Syntax Error wrote:A rematch with DeGale is an obvious choice & I suppose DeGale would want to even the score, but I can't see Groves being DeGale now.
Re: Next For George Groves?
He could beat any of them but has to deliver on the night, he's had 3 goes up to now and talent and promise have to be utilised on the night. Some of his interviews have shown he doesn't take responsibility for his performances and failures, he doesn't seem to have a realistic mind set.
George beat DeGale the best of the titlists but also lost to Jack, the worst.
George beat DeGale the best of the titlists but also lost to Jack, the worst.
Re: Next For George Groves?
He lost to Jack, but it was very close.palooka wrote:He could beat any of them but has to deliver on the night, he's had 3 goes up to now and talent and promise have to be utilised on the night. Some of his interviews have shown he doesn't take responsibility for his performances and failures, he doesn't seem to have a realistic mind set.
George beat DeGale the best of the titlists but also lost to Jack, the worst.
A lot of people refused to score any of the late rounds for Groves just because he was tired.
Being more of an underdog will probably help Groves mentally heading into another big fight.
Re: Next For George Groves?
Let's hope so, he can be a really exciting fighter to watch but he has to grab a title fight and give everything, he is a full time athlete so should be fit enough to go 12 rounds and experienced enough to know that if he gets dropped away from home he has to boss the rounds and impress the judges. He can't expect favours from the judges or to win easy - the man in front of him has dreams and aspirations as well.Horse wrote:He lost to Jack, but it was very close.palooka wrote:He could beat any of them but has to deliver on the night, he's had 3 goes up to now and talent and promise have to be utilised on the night. Some of his interviews have shown he doesn't take responsibility for his performances and failures, he doesn't seem to have a realistic mind set.
George beat DeGale the best of the titlists but also lost to Jack, the worst.
A lot of people refused to score any of the late rounds for Groves just because he was tired.
Being more of an underdog will probably help Groves mentally heading into another big fight.
Re: Next For George Groves?
Groves workrate was pretty decent even though he was huffing, puffing and looking sorry for himself in the late rounds against Jack.palooka wrote:Let's hope so, he can be a really exciting fighter to watch but he has to grab a title fight and give everything, he is a full time athlete so should be fit enough to go 12 rounds and experienced enough to know that if he gets dropped away from home he has to boss the rounds and impress the judges. He can't expect favours from the judges or to win easy - the man in front of him has dreams and aspirations as well.
Maybe he just has to work on his poker face.
Re: Next For George Groves?
I'd like to see him fight Blackledge next, a up and coming British boxer with a lot to prove would give Groves a good challenge, not to mention get him fighting in front of a UK crowd again and the Commonwealth belt potentially that gives him a little more bargaining power down the line when he does get back into world contention.
Re: Next For George Groves?
This is pretty interesting http://www.BS.com/sauerlandgro ... or--100913
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9007
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: Next For George Groves?
Groves has poor stamina & that's why I believe it will be his undoing every time he steps up to world class level.Horse wrote:Groves workrate was pretty decent even though he was huffing, puffing and looking sorry for himself in the late rounds against Jack.palooka wrote:Let's hope so, he can be a really exciting fighter to watch but he has to grab a title fight and give everything, he is a full time athlete so should be fit enough to go 12 rounds and experienced enough to know that if he gets dropped away from home he has to boss the rounds and impress the judges. He can't expect favours from the judges or to win easy - the man in front of him has dreams and aspirations as well.
Maybe he just has to work on his poker face.
Re: Next For George Groves?
And not the greatest of chins it seems.Syntax Error wrote:Groves has poor stamina & that's why I believe it will be his undoing every time he steps up to world class level.Horse wrote:Groves workrate was pretty decent even though he was huffing, puffing and looking sorry for himself in the late rounds against Jack.palooka wrote:Let's hope so, he can be a really exciting fighter to watch but he has to grab a title fight and give everything, he is a full time athlete so should be fit enough to go 12 rounds and experienced enough to know that if he gets dropped away from home he has to boss the rounds and impress the judges. He can't expect favours from the judges or to win easy - the man in front of him has dreams and aspirations as well.
Maybe he just has to work on his poker face.
Re: Next For George Groves?
Groves vs Jack - Punch stats:Syntax Error wrote:Groves has poor stamina & that's why I believe it will be his undoing every time he steps up to world class level.
Jack: Punches thrown - 506. Punches connected 210. (42 %)
Groves: Punches thrown - 721 Punches connected 154 (21 %)
721 punches thrown isn't bad.
-
MarkMcBurney
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47
Re: Next For George Groves?
Not forgetting the shedload of punches he threw (1,000?) in the Rebrasse fight too.Horse wrote:Groves vs Jack - Punch stats:Syntax Error wrote:Groves has poor stamina & that's why I believe it will be his undoing every time he steps up to world class level.
Jack: Punches thrown - 506. Punches connected 210. (42 %)
Groves: Punches thrown - 721 Punches connected 154 (21 %)
721 punches thrown isn't bad.
-
MarkMcBurney
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47
Re: Next For George Groves?
Very interesting, and actually Groves/Sauerland have a point there. Giving the number 7 ranked fighter a chance to fight for a shot at Jack is poor form if the number 3 ranked fighter is available.lefty wrote:This is pretty interesting http://www.BS.com/sauerlandgro ... or--100913
Would love to see Callum v George.