Canelo fans, chew on this...
Posted: 21 Mar 2016, 13:44
Saul "Canelo" Alvarez is not a real middleweight champ because he has never fought at the middleweight weight limit. Yup and Fact. Ooops.
Wow thanks for the clarification.DrunkenBoxer wrote:Saul "Canelo" Alvarez is not a real middleweight champ because he has never fought at the middleweight weight limit. Yup and Fact. Ooops.
tiny_acres wrote:Wow thanks for the clarification.DrunkenBoxer wrote:Saul "Canelo" Alvarez is not a real middleweight champ because he has never fought at the middleweight weight limit. Yup and Fact. Ooops.
Like we couldn't figure out that he won the belt at a catchweight. I know the other 864 threads about this never sunk in for any of us.
So thanks for finally bringing this to our attention
How so? I know, of course, that you can come in lighter than the limit should you wish and still compete at that weight. Though having your opponents contractually obliged to weigh under the limit or you won't allow them to fight for the title sort of makes the idea of that title being a legitimate title in that division (and of course the bloke wearing it) rather fraudulent, doesn't it?expe wrote:tiny_acres wrote:Wow thanks for the clarification.DrunkenBoxer wrote:Saul "Canelo" Alvarez is not a real middleweight champ because he has never fought at the middleweight weight limit. Yup and Fact. Ooops.
Like we couldn't figure out that he won the belt at a catchweight. I know the other 864 threads about this never sunk in for any of us.
So thanks for finally bringing this to our attention![]()
And like the previous 864 threads, the OP is wrong.
Middleweight is anything above 11st to 11st 6, as long as he weighs somewhere in that range he's fighting as a middleweight. They can still fight for the title whether they make the catchweight or not, WBC have confirmed that the catchweight is nothing to do with them and no one's going to say that anyone that beats Alvarez isn't lineal champion if they come in above the catchweight, as long as they make 11st 6.Lenny Cravats wrote:How so? I know, of course, that you can come in lighter than the limit should you wish and still compete at that weight. Though having your opponents contractually obliged to weigh under the limit or you won't allow them to fight for the title sort of makes the idea of that title being a legitimate title in that division (and of course the bloke wearing it) rather fraudulent, doesn't it?expe wrote:tiny_acres wrote: Wow thanks for the clarification.
Like we couldn't figure out that he won the belt at a catchweight. I know the other 864 threads about this never sunk in for any of us.
So thanks for finally bringing this to our attention![]()
And like the previous 864 threads, the OP is wrong.
Good give up the title then. Sounds great.Pureist wrote:You can come in at whatever weight you want as long as it's 160 or under, forcing your opponent in at a specific, contracted weight is a catchweight
It's 160 and under.DrunkenBoxer wrote:Saul "Canelo" Alvarez is not a real middleweight champ because he has never fought at the middleweight weight limit. Yup and Fact. Ooops.
koolkc107 wrote:It's 160 and under.DrunkenBoxer wrote:Saul "Canelo" Alvarez is not a real middleweight champ because he has never fought at the middleweight weight limit. Yup and Fact. Ooops.
By limit, they are saying "160 is the MOST you can weigh to win this belt". Nothing to do with the LEAST you can be.Ricky_ wrote:koolkc107 wrote:It's 160 and under.DrunkenBoxer wrote:Saul "Canelo" Alvarez is not a real middleweight champ because he has never fought at the middleweight weight limit. Yup and Fact. Ooops.
It's not "and under". It's 160 "weight limit".
Canelo's catchweight impose a limit below 160, therefore he's never had a middleweight fight, i.e, a fight fought in the parameters of the middleweight limit.
Don't you get tired of me owning you?Ricky_ wrote:Blah blah blah. Nobody asked for a rant. 160 "limit". Doesn't require an honours degree.
Are you a vampire?Ricky_ wrote:Blah blah blah. Nobody asked for a rant. 160 "limit". Doesn't require an honours degree.
Owning what? All you own is an old playboy and an xbox.koolkc107 wrote:Don't you get tired of me owning you?Ricky_ wrote:Blah blah blah. Nobody asked for a rant. 160 "limit". Doesn't require an honours degree.
And nude pics of your wife, don't forget those...she sure hasn't.Ricky_ wrote:Owning what? All you own is an old playboy and an xbox.koolkc107 wrote:Don't you get tired of me owning you?Ricky_ wrote:Blah blah blah. Nobody asked for a rant. 160 "limit". Doesn't require an honours degree.
koolkc107 wrote: And nude pics of your wife, don't forget those...she sure hasn't.
No idea what state it is in. But since YOU do, then I figure you must be the sucker paying her mortgage and car note, you sprung mofo.Ricky_ wrote:koolkc107 wrote: And nude pics of your wife, don't forget those...she sure hasn't.
For when you get bored of banging your mother's saggy vag
I have zero real hostility towards Pretty Ricky.SFW wrote:If only Canelo had the same hostility and vigor you two guys have, we might get a real middleweight fight. Boxing is better with Canelo flat on his back.
koolkc107 wrote:No idea what state it is in. But since YOU do, then I figure you must be the sucker paying her mortgage and car note, you sprung mofo.Ricky_ wrote:koolkc107 wrote: And nude pics of your wife, don't forget those...she sure hasn't.
For when you get bored of banging your mother's saggy vag
Glad your wife is a cheaper date. One happy meal and I'm straight for unlimited poses and "re-takes".
More than even trade if you ask me.