A few people have cast doubts on Browne's claim. But in order to verify it, here is a copy of the test:

The most important information in the document above is:
Collection Date - 29th February 2016
Result - NEGATIVE

why call people morons 99% of boxers that test positive say they didn't do it .fantompunch wrote:Of course it was!....its worth noting that most posters commented about his 'change in physique'
Fools are easily led by gossip ...wait for the EVIDENCE before you morons jump on the bandwagon!
yes they do.... but not all have their negative reports shown.stevedoc wrote:why call people morons 99% of boxers that test positive say they didn't do it .fantompunch wrote:Of course it was!....its worth noting that most posters commented about his 'change in physique'
Fools are easily led by gossip ...wait for the EVIDENCE before you morons jump on the bandwagon!
of course i read it what do you mean are u a 1%er, that i take PEDS but don't claim i didn't ? that makes no sense at allfantompunch wrote:yes they do.... but not all have their negative reports shown.stevedoc wrote:why call people morons 99% of boxers that test positive say they didn't do it .fantompunch wrote:Of course it was!....its worth noting that most posters commented about his 'change in physique'
Fools are easily led by gossip ...wait for the EVIDENCE before you morons jump on the bandwagon!
did u read it? or are u a one percenter?
Well sense and your post history are never the twain.stevedoc wrote:of course i read it what do you mean are u a 1%er, that i take PEDS but don't claim i didn't ? that makes no sense at allfantompunch wrote:yes they do.... but not all have their negative reports shown.stevedoc wrote:
why call people morons 99% of boxers that test positive say they didn't do it .
did u read it? or are u a one percenter?
Funny that you mention my post history yet your account only has 5 posts all from today...surely you couldn't have more than one accountfantompunch wrote:Well sense and your post history are never the twain.stevedoc wrote:of course i read it what do you mean are u a 1%er, that i take PEDS but don't claim i didn't ? that makes no sense at allfantompunch wrote:
yes they do.... but not all have their negative reports shown.
did u read it? or are u a one percenter?
I commented on the response to the allegations of Lucas Browne's ilicit drug taking.
Do u really think that that Browne would go into this fight....knowing he would be thoroughly drug tested (especially after the Solomon fight)
would cheat...and get away with it?
That would be dependent entirely on how much he ingested.GhostBoxing15 wrote:I could only believe he was spiked if he returned a high reading of Clen......
The first test was conducted on Feb 29. The second test was conducted on March 6.GhostBoxing15 wrote:He had a five day window from his first test to post test
Are u retarded? Testing can detect a trillionth of a gram, what do u think would be an amount somebody can handle in a kitchen to put in someone's food? You would have to be able to see it for a start?bogan whisperer wrote:You can't record a very high reading for something if you are only supplied a very small amount of it. It's simply not possible. Chemistry 101.
That much is obviousGhostBoxing15 wrote: I'm guessing....
Considering u sleep up to 10 hours a day, his window for being spiked is lessbogan whisperer wrote:The first test was conducted on Feb 29. The second test was conducted on March 6.GhostBoxing15 wrote:He had a five day window from his first test to post test
Incorrect! The first test was conducted on Feb 29. The second test was conducted on March 6. That isn't 5 days.GhostBoxing15 wrote:He had a five day window from his first test to post test...
say a liquid form millilitre of Clen is 25mcg, how much is dodgy gangster going to Droplet into a meal? He's working from a kitchen, not a laboratoryGhostBoxing15 wrote:Are u retarded? Testing can detect a trillionth of a gram, what do u think would be an amount somebody can handle in a kitchen to put in someone's food? You would have to be able to see it for a start?bogan whisperer wrote:You can't record a very high reading for something if you are only supplied a very small amount of it. It's simply not possible. Chemistry 101.
Alberto Contador tested positive with a result of 5 picograms & got a 2 year banbogan whisperer wrote:You can't record a very high reading for something if you are only supplied a very small amount of it. Yes it may very well put you outside of the normal parameters and provide you with a positive result, but it is simply not possible to record a very high reading if you are only spiked with a miniscule amount of something. Chemistry 101.
We don't know the reading because Browne isn't sharing the information, let's sit back & watch the circus of Team Browne, going on a witch hunt to search for the Holy Grail in Chechnya where nobody speaks English, Goodluck with him proving his innocencebogan whisperer wrote:You don't even know what reading Browne registered on his positive test![]()
You have made so many assumptions you are tripping over them
Keep guessingGhostBoxing15 wrote:We don't know the reading because Browne isn't sharing the information, let's sit back & watch the circus of Team Browne, going on a witch hunt to search for the Holy Grail in Chechnya where nobody speaks English, Goodluck with him proving his innocencebogan whisperer wrote:You don't even know what reading Browne registered on his positive test![]()
You have made so many assumptions you are tripping over them
Just like Team Browne, anyone that admits being involved is writing their own death sentence so don't expect any confessions coming from the EUbogan whisperer wrote:Keep guessingGhostBoxing15 wrote:We don't know the reading because Browne isn't sharing the information, let's sit back & watch the circus of Team Browne, going on a witch hunt to search for the Holy Grail in Chechnya where nobody speaks English, Goodluck with him proving his innocencebogan whisperer wrote:You don't even know what reading Browne registered on his positive test![]()
You have made so many assumptions you are tripping over them
There is no chance in the world anyone who might have been involved in spiking Browne's food or drink will come forward.GhostBoxing15 wrote:Just like Team Browne, anyone that admits being involved is writing their own death sentence so don't expect any confessions coming from the EUbogan whisperer wrote:Keep guessingGhostBoxing15 wrote:
We don't know the reading because Browne isn't sharing the information, let's sit back & watch the circus of Team Browne, going on a witch hunt to search for the Holy Grail in Chechnya where nobody speaks English, Goodluck with him proving his innocence