BoxRec

Lucas Browne has claimed he was tested by VADA when he first arrived in Grozny and the result was NEGATIVE - that is he passed the test.

A few people have cast doubts on Browne's claim. But in order to verify it, here is a copy of the test:



The most important information in the document above is:

Collection Date - 29th February 2016

Result - NEGATIVE

Of course it was!....its worth noting that most posters commented about his 'change in physique'
Fools are easily led by gossip ...wait for the EVIDENCE before you morons jump on the bandwagon!

fantompunch wrote:Of course it was!....its worth noting that most posters commented about his 'change in physique'
Fools are easily led by gossip ...wait for the EVIDENCE before you morons jump on the bandwagon!

why call people morons 99% of boxers that test positive say they didn't do it .

stevedoc wrote:

fantompunch wrote:Of course it was!....its worth noting that most posters commented about his 'change in physique'
Fools are easily led by gossip ...wait for the EVIDENCE before you morons jump on the bandwagon!

why call people morons 99% of boxers that test positive say they didn't do it .

yes they do.... but not all have their negative reports shown.
did u read it? or are u a one percenter?

fantompunch wrote:

stevedoc wrote:

fantompunch wrote:Of course it was!....its worth noting that most posters commented about his 'change in physique'
Fools are easily led by gossip ...wait for the EVIDENCE before you morons jump on the bandwagon!

why call people morons 99% of boxers that test positive say they didn't do it .

yes they do.... but not all have their negative reports shown.
did u read it? or are u a one percenter?

of course i read it what do you mean are u a 1%er, that i take PEDS but don't claim i didn't ? that makes no sense at all

stevedoc wrote:

fantompunch wrote:

stevedoc wrote:
why call people morons 99% of boxers that test positive say they didn't do it .

yes they do.... but not all have their negative reports shown.
did u read it? or are u a one percenter?

of course i read it what do you mean are u a 1%er, that i take PEDS but don't claim i didn't ? that makes no sense at all

Well sense and your post history are never the twain.

I commented on the response to the allegations of Lucas Browne's ilicit drug taking.

Do u really think that that Browne would go into this fight....knowing he would be thoroughly drug tested (especially after the Solomon fight)

would cheat...and get away with it?

fantompunch wrote:

stevedoc wrote:

fantompunch wrote:
yes they do.... but not all have their negative reports shown.
did u read it? or are u a one percenter?

of course i read it what do you mean are u a 1%er, that i take PEDS but don't claim i didn't ? that makes no sense at all

Well sense and your post history are never the twain.

I commented on the response to the allegations of Lucas Browne's ilicit drug taking.

Do u really think that that Browne would go into this fight....knowing he would be thoroughly drug tested (especially after the Solomon fight)

would cheat...and get away with it?

Funny that you mention my post history yet your account only has 5 posts all from today...surely you couldn't have more than one account

I could only believe he was spiked if he returned a high reading of Clen, doesn't seem like he wants to release that information for some reason
He could have had contaminated supplements, not necessarily a spike, he will go down the spike avenue because it's his only way out, If you were eating in a suspicious place with known drug interference, wouldn't you send someone out to get your meals from somewhere random or buy from a supermarket & prepare your own?
Why would you eat from the place everyone knows your booked in at? Brownes team are either amateurs or plain stupid

GhostBoxing15 wrote:I could only believe he was spiked if he returned a high reading of Clen......

That would be dependent entirely on how much he ingested.

He had a five day window from his first test to post test
Testing can detect trillionth of a gram
Clens half life is 36 Hours
VADA testing can detect Clen in urine from use as far back as 2 weeks
If he was spiked, he would still give a high reading
If he had a cycled use during camp would likely return a very low reading
Enough research has been done on Clen & it's use in Horse Racing ,research has determined it's Users can move to & from positive & negative test results
I'm guessing VADA would have a threshold limit they class as use, they would also be able determine by the amount detected in his system if he had been spiked.

GhostBoxing15 wrote:He had a five day window from his first test to post test

The first test was conducted on Feb 29. The second test was conducted on March 6.

You can't record a very high reading for something if you are only supplied a very small amount of it. Yes it may very well put you outside of the normal parameters and provide you with a positive result, but it is simply not possible to record a very high reading if you are only spiked with a miniscule amount of something. Chemistry 101.

bogan whisperer wrote:You can't record a very high reading for something if you are only supplied a very small amount of it. It's simply not possible. Chemistry 101.

Are u retarded? Testing can detect a trillionth of a gram, what do u think would be an amount somebody can handle in a kitchen to put in someone's food? You would have to be able to see it for a start?

GhostBoxing15 wrote: I'm guessing....

That much is obvious

bogan whisperer wrote:

GhostBoxing15 wrote:He had a five day window from his first test to post test

The first test was conducted on Feb 29. The second test was conducted on March 6.

Considering u sleep up to 10 hours a day, his window for being spiked is less

GhostBoxing15 wrote:He had a five day window from his first test to post test...

Incorrect! The first test was conducted on Feb 29. The second test was conducted on March 6. That isn't 5 days.

GhostBoxing15 wrote:

bogan whisperer wrote:You can't record a very high reading for something if you are only supplied a very small amount of it. It's simply not possible. Chemistry 101.

Are u retarded? Testing can detect a trillionth of a gram, what do u think would be an amount somebody can handle in a kitchen to put in someone's food? You would have to be able to see it for a start?

say a liquid form millilitre of Clen is 25mcg, how much is dodgy gangster going to Droplet into a meal? He's working from a kitchen, not a laboratory

bogan whisperer wrote:You can't record a very high reading for something if you are only supplied a very small amount of it. Yes it may very well put you outside of the normal parameters and provide you with a positive result, but it is simply not possible to record a very high reading if you are only spiked with a miniscule amount of something. Chemistry 101.

Alberto Contador tested positive with a result of 5 picograms & got a 2 year ban
If you know anything about Chemistry 101 a spike would give a higher reading than Contadors 5 picograms. Contador went for the contaminated meat excuse & research had found Clenbutirol use in meat was rarely ever used in Europe. They had determined Contadors + tests likelihood was from using contaminated supplements or from IV blood transfusions

You don't even know what reading Browne registered on his positive test

You have made so many assumptions you are tripping over them

bogan whisperer wrote:You don't even know what reading Browne registered on his positive test

You have made so many assumptions you are tripping over them

We don't know the reading because Browne isn't sharing the information, let's sit back & watch the circus of Team Browne, going on a witch hunt to search for the Holy Grail in Chechnya where nobody speaks English, Goodluck with him proving his innocence

GhostBoxing15 wrote:

bogan whisperer wrote:You don't even know what reading Browne registered on his positive test

You have made so many assumptions you are tripping over them

We don't know the reading because Browne isn't sharing the information, let's sit back & watch the circus of Team Browne, going on a witch hunt to search for the Holy Grail in Chechnya where nobody speaks English, Goodluck with him proving his innocence

Keep guessing

bogan whisperer wrote:

GhostBoxing15 wrote:

bogan whisperer wrote:You don't even know what reading Browne registered on his positive test

You have made so many assumptions you are tripping over them

We don't know the reading because Browne isn't sharing the information, let's sit back & watch the circus of Team Browne, going on a witch hunt to search for the Holy Grail in Chechnya where nobody speaks English, Goodluck with him proving his innocence

Keep guessing

Just like Team Browne, anyone that admits being involved is writing their own death sentence so don't expect any confessions coming from the EU

GhostBoxing15 wrote:

bogan whisperer wrote:

GhostBoxing15 wrote:
We don't know the reading because Browne isn't sharing the information, let's sit back & watch the circus of Team Browne, going on a witch hunt to search for the Holy Grail in Chechnya where nobody speaks English, Goodluck with him proving his innocence

Keep guessing

Just like Team Browne, anyone that admits being involved is writing their own death sentence so don't expect any confessions coming from the EU

There is no chance in the world anyone who might have been involved in spiking Browne's food or drink will come forward.