BoxRec

WBO, WBC, WBA, IBF are obvious.

But I presume they are not alone in the ABC soup?

Countless, though IBO has a little weight, I don't know of any others that are at all legit. Plus there are all the magazine belts, but I think the only one of those that people care about is The Ring.

I pretty much ignore any other than the big 4. I even consider the Ring Magazine title a worthless trinket and not a proper world title.

The Ring Belt is the only one administered properly. IMO, the best.

tigermoth87 wrote:I pretty much ignore any other than the big 4. I even consider the Ring Magazine title a worthless trinket and not a proper world title.

But The Ring is the hardest to get.

Loki wrote:The Ring Belt is the only one administered properly. IMO, the best.

Yep and their top 10 lists are pretty solid.

It is a shame the big 4 are considered the best and not the IBO. The IBO have the best policies and morals of them all, just don't have the clout to enforce mandatories and eliminators.

I think the more the merrier, it dilutes the value of world title. It means more unifications and top fights.

BitPlayer wrote:

tigermoth87 wrote:I pretty much ignore any other than the big 4. I even consider the Ring Magazine title a worthless trinket and not a proper world title.

But The Ring is the hardest to get.

roman gonzalez is their king and it looks
to me like he fought relatively easy opposition.