WBO, WBC, WBA, IBF are obvious.
But I presume they are not alone in the ABC soup?
How many belts are in the scene???
-
bigman1968
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 672
- Joined: 24 Jul 2014, 03:45
Re: How many belts are in the scene???
Countless, though IBO has a little weight, I don't know of any others that are at all legit. Plus there are all the magazine belts, but I think the only one of those that people care about is The Ring.
Last edited by BitPlayer on 26 Apr 2016, 10:10, edited 1 time in total.
-
tigermoth87
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1795
- Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23
Re: How many belts are in the scene???
I pretty much ignore any other than the big 4. I even consider the Ring Magazine title a worthless trinket and not a proper world title.
Re: How many belts are in the scene???
The Ring Belt is the only one administered properly. IMO, the best.
Re: How many belts are in the scene???
But The Ring is the hardest to get.tigermoth87 wrote:I pretty much ignore any other than the big 4. I even consider the Ring Magazine title a worthless trinket and not a proper world title.
Re: How many belts are in the scene???
Yep and their top 10 lists are pretty solid.Loki wrote:The Ring Belt is the only one administered properly. IMO, the best.
Re: How many belts are in the scene???
It is a shame the big 4 are considered the best and not the IBO. The IBO have the best policies and morals of them all, just don't have the clout to enforce mandatories and eliminators.
I think the more the merrier, it dilutes the value of world title. It means more unifications and top fights.
I think the more the merrier, it dilutes the value of world title. It means more unifications and top fights.
Re: How many belts are in the scene???
roman gonzalez is their king and it looksBitPlayer wrote:But The Ring is the hardest to get.tigermoth87 wrote:I pretty much ignore any other than the big 4. I even consider the Ring Magazine title a worthless trinket and not a proper world title.
to me like he fought relatively easy opposition.