I hope Team-GGG decide to just force the issue and fight now (the only reason to not fight immediately is if he's going to grab the WBO title and bring it to the table for an end-of-year 4-title showdown).
"T.M.K"
I sure as hell hope not too. I'm a huge GGG fan, but I'll be sickened by him and his team if they agree to this garbage. Because it'll forever be 2 or 3 more fights.crusader wrote:2-3 interim fights
I hope GGG's side isn't up for that.
Ya, this may just be a matter of GB presenting that as an option, even if GGG's team isn't up for it; I certainly hope that's the case too.runner_phob wrote:I am sure that those proposals are from DLH, so they have to be "discussed". Golovkin and Loefler clearly said "no more delays". I doubt that they would back up.
It is absolutely not clear that Canelo is #2 MW. Lemieux, Saunders and Eubank Jr could beat him.jujigatame wrote:Canelo is 25, Golovkin is 34. Every month that passes is to Canelo's advantage.
The fight should happen now. They're clearly the 2 best guys at the weight. When obvious fights like this don't happen, it helps push boxing farther into nichedom.
Luckybattles wrote:I would like to see GGG first take on Amir Khan.
Is this a joke or are you just a sadist?Luckybattles wrote:I would like to see GGG first take on Amir Khan.
September or October of this year makes the most sense.Ricky_ wrote:Luckybattles wrote:I would like to see GGG first take on Amir Khan.
Bet you're the type of guy who likes putting bugs under a microscope in the sun or the family pet in the microwave.
As for Canelo-GGG.... if i were the promoter or Canelos manager i think 2017 makes most sense.
He's taking the piss.gilgamesh wrote:Is this a joke or are you just a sadist?Luckybattles wrote:I would like to see GGG first take on Amir Khan.
You can't fight corruption or City Hall by your lonesome. Golovkin has been chasing the Lineal Middleweight Title for 7 years. If your opponent doesn't want to fight you and pays off the WBC, and they allow all these "exceptions" to their mandatory, deemed "reasonable" because of the so-called desire to buildup the fight, there's nothing you can do. They stripped Cotto of the title because of non-payment of a 350,000 dollar fee. That's not surprising. But it's been said for many months, the idea that they would strip Canelo for refusing to fight his mandatory is a stretch -- even though they've said so in no uncertain terms... That may just have been for public consumption and they're hearing from the Canelo people.gilgamesh wrote:does nobody on Team GGG have any balls when it comes to the negotiating table? Put your f*cking foot down already
At the very least GGG and his team can reject the idea of building it up any further and demand that Canelo either fight or be stripped of the belt. Nothing else is an acceptable response from GGG for me.Kalan wrote:You can't fight corruption or City Hall by your lonesome. Golovkin has been chasing the Lineal Middleweight Title for 7 years. If your opponent doesn't want to fight you and pays off the WBC, and they allow all these "exceptions" to their mandatory, deemed "reasonable" because of the so-called desire to buildup the fight, there's nothing you can do. They stripped Cotto of the title because of non-payment of a 350,000 dollar fee. That's not surprising. But it's been said for many months, the idea that they would strip Canelo for refusing to fight his mandatory is a stretch -- even though they've said so in no uncertain terms... That may just have been for public consumption and they're hearing from the Canelo people.gilgamesh wrote:does nobody on Team GGG have any balls when it comes to the negotiating table? Put your f*cking foot down already
Not for Canelo. He's not fought at the weight yet. His problem is he is sitting on a belt which is something of a farce. If i'm his trainer than i want him competing at 160 first.. maybe vs a guy like Saunders before GGG.gilgamesh wrote:September or October of this year makes the most sense.Ricky_ wrote:Luckybattles wrote:I would like to see GGG first take on Amir Khan.
Bet you're the type of guy who likes putting bugs under a microscope in the sun or the family pet in the microwave.
As for Canelo-GGG.... if i were the promoter or Canelos manager i think 2017 makes most sense.
Precisely, by which time GGG is 37 - and beginning to show signs of decline, or worse becomes plagued with injuries.davie wrote:It's also worth noting, Golovkin could squeeze 2 fights into 6 months, as he likes to keep busy, 3 fights could be done in 9. And if they are lower level opposition, they're likely to be relatively quick blow-outs
Canelo's fights all have to be built as super-fight p4p events and will happen at a rate of 1 every 6 months.
3 fights for him could take 18 months and delay the event for a full 2 years
T.M.K wrote:http://www.fightnews.com/Boxing/canelo- ... ate-338195
![]()
![]()
![]()
I hope Team-GGG decide to just force the issue and fight now (the only reason to not fight immediately is if he's going to grab the WBO title and bring it to the table for an end-of-year 4-title showdown).
![]()
"T.M.K"
Ahh, just seen this, my blood pressure can now return to normal - for now.