Welterweight Super Six

Who would win the tournament?

Poll ended at 23 Aug 2016, 12:26

Danny Garcia
0
No votes
Keith Thurman
7
20%
Terence Crawford
9
26%
Errol Spence Jr.
7
20%
Kell Brook
11
31%
Timothy Bradley Jr.
1
3%
 
Total votes: 35

Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101691
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Welterweight Super Six

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

I have just picked who I think are the top welterweights. I know I have missed out Pacman and Porter
  • Danny Garcia
    Keith Thurman
    Terence Crawford
    Errol Spence
    Kell Brook
    Timothy Bradley Jr
What would be the best match ups?

Who would win the tournament?
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Welterweight Super Six

Post by Enlightened-One »

Didn't Crawford state after the Postol bout that he was only willing to face Pacquiao at 140lbs?
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101691
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Welterweight Super Six

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Enlightened-One wrote:Didn't Crawford state after the Postol bout that he was only willing to face Pacquiao at 140lbs?
I think he will move up to 147 eventually, maybe in the next year or so. Regardless of if he fights pacman.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Welterweight Super Six

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

I'd pick Spence and I'd look forward to Spence/Crawford the most. I don't think Brook will ever see Welter again.

I'd also look forward to Garcia/Thurman. Danny is fun for most to hate, sickly underrated right now. If you go by resume he's top 3 p4p.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Welterweight Super Six

Post by Badhusker »

Imo Spence. Crawford and Bradley won't fight, doubt if Brook sees 147 again.
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: Welterweight Super Six

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I'd pick Spence and I'd look forward to Spence/Crawford the most. I don't think Brook will ever see Welter again.

I'd also look forward to Garcia/Thurman. Danny is fun for most to hate, sickly underrated right now. If you go by resume he's top 3 p4p.
:yay: :yay: :yay: :yay: :yay: :yay: :yay: :yay: :yay: :yay: :yay: :yay: :yay: :yay: :yay:

I knew it wasn't just me.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Welterweight Super Six

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

It's all the same people that mocked me for saying Garcia/Matthysse was a 50/50 fight.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Welterweight Super Six

Post by Counter-puncher »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Danny is fun for most to hate, sickly underrated right now. If you go by resume he's top 3 p4p.
Old Morales, khan, matthyse...umm who am I missing here?
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Welterweight Super Six

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Counter-puncher wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Danny is fun for most to hate, sickly underrated right now. If you go by resume he's top 3 p4p.
Old Morales, khan, matthyse...umm who am I missing here?
Judah, Peterson,Guerrero, Malignaggi. I'm not claiming he's an ATG, but his resume is better than GGG's. I don't think resume matters for p4p considering it's not even real, but a lot of posters go that way. Her's more accomplished than Wlad.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46546
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Welterweight Super Six

Post by gilgamesh »

I'd probably favor Spence in that Tournament, though I'd be very curious to see how Tim Bradley would do in those matchups as well. You'd probably have to replace Kell Brook with Shawn Porter because like Saad said I doubt we'll be seeing Brook return to 147.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46546
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Welterweight Super Six

Post by gilgamesh »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Danny is fun for most to hate, sickly underrated right now. If you go by resume he's top 3 p4p.
Old Morales, khan, matthyse...umm who am I missing here?
Judah, Peterson,Guerrero, Malignaggi. I'm not claiming he's an ATG, but his resume is better than GGG's. I don't think resume matters for p4p considering it's not even real, but a lot of posters go that way. Her's more accomplished than Wlad.
Danny definitely has a good resume, but he's pissed all of his career momentum away since 2013 with basically no meaningful fights. Lamont Peterson was a good opponent post-Matthysse...and that's about it.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Welterweight Super Six

Post by Counter-puncher »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Judah, Peterson,Guerrero, Malignaggi. I'm not claiming he's an ATG, but his resume is better than GGG's. I don't think resume matters for p4p considering it's not even real, but a lot of posters go that way. Her's more accomplished than Wlad.

Fair enough, certainly better than GGG. My instinct is there are a couple of dudes with better rosters but id have to actually sit and think about it and i doubt it would make too much difference. Its that Chavez like, lot of solid but no tope fighters, there's a lot of depth to Garcias cv...id forgotten Judah and malignaggi
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: Welterweight Super Six

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

gilgamesh wrote:Danny definitely has a good resume, but he's pissed all of his career momentum away since 2013 with basically no meaningful fights. Lamont Peterson was a good opponent post-Matthysse...and that's about it.
2012 Morales SUPER ROIDS + coming off a TKO win and a good loss to Maidana
2013 Khan :lol:
2013 Mattysse :o
2015 Peterson
2016 ________

In between all that, you have solid wins against
2013 Judah Zab's last stand
2015 Malinaggi To this day, only very good fighters stop Paulie
2016 Guerrero Fights everyone tough

Herrera - An ugly fight that was close. In a distraction trap fight. But everyone has one of those.
Salka & Morales II - Paydays, thanks Al :lol:

MOST IMPORTANTLY, every win (except the Herrera mess) was clear in favor of Danny.

Since 2012, how many guys can match that?
Last edited by BAD INTENTIONS on 18 Aug 2016, 14:38, edited 1 time in total.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46546
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Welterweight Super Six

Post by gilgamesh »

A bit of a fact check here. Matthysse was in 2013. Khan was in 2012. Malignaggi is shot and is no competition at all for any of the Top Welterweights anymore. Guerrero is a punching bag for people because he fought Floyd Mayweather once, he's finished also, but he'll get used as a stepping stone on a few more guys' records before he fades away...probably Spence and Porter.

Morales wasn't on steroids. If you're referring to his negative drug test he tested positive for diuretics which is something that will make you piss more and lose weight faster. A banned substance, but not a performance enhancer.
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: Welterweight Super Six

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

gilgamesh wrote:A bit of a fact check here. Matthysse was in 2013. Khan was in 2012. Malignaggi is shot and is no competition at all for any of the Top Welterweights anymore. Guerrero is a punching bag for people because he fought Floyd Mayweather once, he's finished also, but he'll get used as a stepping stone on a few more guys' records before he fades away...probably Spence and Porter.

Morales wasn't on steroids. If you're referring to his negative drug test he tested positive for diuretics which is something that will make you piss more and lose weight faster. A banned substance, but not a performance enhancer.
Yea ... wasn't on steroids ... in a sudden late career resurgence in a higher weight class ... :witzend:

How is Guerrero finished? He's what he always been at 147.
Lost to Mayweather, Thurman and Garcia ... duh.
Had a tough fight against Martinez. Happens.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46546
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Welterweight Super Six

Post by gilgamesh »

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:A bit of a fact check here. Matthysse was in 2013. Khan was in 2012. Malignaggi is shot and is no competition at all for any of the Top Welterweights anymore. Guerrero is a punching bag for people because he fought Floyd Mayweather once, he's finished also, but he'll get used as a stepping stone on a few more guys' records before he fades away...probably Spence and Porter.

Morales wasn't on steroids. If you're referring to his negative drug test he tested positive for diuretics which is something that will make you piss more and lose weight faster. A banned substance, but not a performance enhancer.
Yea ... wasn't on steroids ... in a sudden late career resurgence in a higher weight class ... :witzend:

How is Guerrero finished? He's what he always been at 147.
Lost to Mayweather, Thurman and Garcia ... duh.
Had a tough fight against Martinez. Happens.
I don't think Guerrero is quite what he once was, but he never was all that great to begin with. He's a tough guy who is a problem for the fringe contenders, and at one time the guys in the lower Top 10...I don't think he beats any Top 10 Welterweight now.

Morales never tested positive for Steroids. That's a fact.
digzee
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1582
Joined: 11 Nov 2008, 13:49

Re: Welterweight Super Six

Post by digzee »

gilgamesh wrote:
BAD INTENTIONS wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:A bit of a fact check here. Matthysse was in 2013. Khan was in 2012. Malignaggi is shot and is no competition at all for any of the Top Welterweights anymore. Guerrero is a punching bag for people because he fought Floyd Mayweather once, he's finished also, but he'll get used as a stepping stone on a few more guys' records before he fades away...probably Spence and Porter.

Morales wasn't on steroids. If you're referring to his negative drug test he tested positive for diuretics which is something that will make you piss more and lose weight faster. A banned substance, but not a performance enhancer.
Yea ... wasn't on steroids ... in a sudden late career resurgence in a higher weight class ... :witzend:

How is Guerrero finished? He's what he always been at 147.
Lost to Mayweather, Thurman and Garcia ... duh.
Had a tough fight against Martinez. Happens.
I don't think Guerrero is quite what he once was, but he never was all that great to begin with. He's a tough guy who is a problem for the fringe contenders, and at one time the guys in the lower Top 10...I don't think he beats any Top 10 Welterweight now.

Morales never tested positive for Steroids. That's a fact.
I think that war with Kamegai took a lot out of Guerrero too.
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: Welterweight Super Six

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

gilgamesh wrote:Morales never tested positive for Steroids. That's a fact.
Let's keep this going until you realize it.

Paul Williams beat Erislandy Lara. That's a fact.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46546
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Welterweight Super Six

Post by gilgamesh »

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:Morales never tested positive for Steroids. That's a fact.
Let's keep this going until you realize it.

Paul Williams beat Erislandy Lara. That's a fact.
He got the official win over him that much is a fact. Lara won the fight.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Welterweight Super Six

Post by lefty »

gilgamesh wrote:A bit of a fact check here. Matthysse was in 2013. Khan was in 2012. Malignaggi is shot and is no competition at all for any of the Top Welterweights anymore. Guerrero is a punching bag for people because he fought Floyd Mayweather once, he's finished also, but he'll get used as a stepping stone on a few more guys' records before he fades away...probably Spence and Porter.

Morales wasn't on steroids. If you're referring to his negative drug test he tested positive for diuretics which is something that will make you piss more and lose weight faster. A banned substance, but not a performance enhancer.
it wasn't a diuretic mate http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/boxing/la ... --box.html
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46546
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Welterweight Super Six

Post by gilgamesh »

Well I stand corrected then
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Welterweight Super Six

Post by lefty »

gilgamesh wrote:Well I stand corrected then
It was a fat burner so used for a similar type of purpose as a diuretic though. Not a steroid.
NateJR
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1181
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 19:58

Re: Welterweight Super Six

Post by NateJR »

Seems the abundance of GGG but huggers are picking Brook simply to justify GGG fighting someone 2 divisions smaller than him. :OhYes:
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46546
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Welterweight Super Six

Post by gilgamesh »

NateJR wrote:Seems the abundance of GGG but huggers are picking Brook simply to justify GGG fighting someone 2 divisions smaller than him. :OhYes:
Did Marvin Hagler need justification to fight Roberto Duran? Did Carlos Monzon need justification to fight Jose Napoles? The #1 Middleweight vs The #1 Welterweight is not an uncommon occurrence in Boxing history. Especially when the aforementioned Middleweight has already basically cleaned out the division.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Welterweight Super Six

Post by Badhusker »

Neither GGG or Brook deserves to be mentioned in the same sentence as Hagler and Duran.....not yet anyway, so stop it Gil. If it's a good fight I will be back here to admit I'm wrong, but this is a mismatch.
Post Reply