Assoc. Of Boxing Commissions

Post Reply
dw01
Middleweight
Posts: 140
Joined: 06 Nov 2013, 09:56

Assoc. Of Boxing Commissions

Post by dw01 »

Why doesn't the BBBoCwish to join this organisation, do they have conflicting rules & regulations, or is it another reason?

I've seen forum members make stupid comments like "The ABC, ha" etc, but nobody explains why they look down on this organisation, which to me, seems to be trying to unify the codes for boxing.

Have I missed something?
dw01
Middleweight
Posts: 140
Joined: 06 Nov 2013, 09:56

Re: Assoc. Of Boxing Commissions

Post by dw01 »

Anybody?
Cazelo
Welterweight
Posts: 209
Joined: 09 Oct 2015, 13:01

Re: Assoc. Of Boxing Commissions

Post by Cazelo »

Maybe the law can shed some light?

I don't know what's going to happen with boxrec and the other organisations that were deemed unofficial now boxrec are an official registry
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Assoc. Of Boxing Commissions

Post by Sklar »

Sometimes you degrade your product by joining johnny come lately trade associations. Standing strong alone gives off an air of greater credibility to me, particularly when you're tried and tested.
dw01
Middleweight
Posts: 140
Joined: 06 Nov 2013, 09:56

Re: Assoc. Of Boxing Commissions

Post by dw01 »

Cazelo wrote:Maybe the law can shed some light?

I don't know what's going to happen with boxrec and the other organisations that were deemed unofficial now boxrec are an official registry

Sorry, to who? The ABC? Is FightFax also?
dw01
Middleweight
Posts: 140
Joined: 06 Nov 2013, 09:56

Re: Assoc. Of Boxing Commissions

Post by dw01 »

Sklar wrote:Sometimes you degrade your product by joining johnny come lately trade associations. Standing strong alone gives off an air of greater credibility to me, particularly when you're tried and tested.

Just looking at the members of the ABC and it seems almost all of the credible organisations are members, you'd think the unity would be a positive action?
The Law
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1948
Joined: 19 Feb 2005, 19:02

Re: Assoc. Of Boxing Commissions

Post by The Law »

dw01 wrote:
Sklar wrote:Sometimes you degrade your product by joining johnny come lately trade associations. Standing strong alone gives off an air of greater credibility to me, particularly when you're tried and tested.

Just looking at the members of the ABC and it seems almost all of the credible organisations are members, you'd think the unity would be a positive action?
The former BBBofC general secretary John Morris touched on this topic in 1999. He wanted a world governing body for boxing similar to FIFA (but obviously not as corrupt!) http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/boxi ... 81229.html
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Assoc. Of Boxing Commissions

Post by expe »

dw01 wrote:
Sklar wrote:Sometimes you degrade your product by joining johnny come lately trade associations. Standing strong alone gives off an air of greater credibility to me, particularly when you're tried and tested.

Just looking at the members of the ABC and it seems almost all of the credible organisations are members, you'd think the unity would be a positive action?
It's just the US and Canadian commissions, plus a couple of outliers like a Brazilian MMA board and MBA. That's not almost all of the credible organisations, it's none of them.
dw01
Middleweight
Posts: 140
Joined: 06 Nov 2013, 09:56

Re: Assoc. Of Boxing Commissions

Post by dw01 »

expe wrote:
dw01 wrote:
Sklar wrote:Sometimes you degrade your product by joining johnny come lately trade associations. Standing strong alone gives off an air of greater credibility to me, particularly when you're tried and tested.

Just looking at the members of the ABC and it seems almost all of the credible organisations are members, you'd think the unity would be a positive action?
It's just the US and Canadian commissions, plus a couple of outliers like a Brazilian MMA board and MBA. That's not almost all of the credible organisations, it's none of them.


Aren't WBC, WBA, etc involved?
John
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9116
Joined: 08 May 2000, 20:00

Re: Assoc. Of Boxing Commissions

Post by John »

No, sanctioning bodies are explicitly forbidden, the ABC is subject to the Muhammad Ali Boxing Reform Act. It is for the 50 state commissions and around 20 Tribal Commissions. Although associate commissions eg some of the the Canadians may attend the convention they are not allowed to vote. I think though associate commissions are eligible to attend closed sessions of the convention but I'm not 100% on that. I have been to a few ABC conventions, they are a very well run organisation.
dw01
Middleweight
Posts: 140
Joined: 06 Nov 2013, 09:56

Re: Assoc. Of Boxing Commissions

Post by dw01 »

John wrote:No, sanctioning bodies are explicitly forbidden, the ABC is subject to the Muhammad Ali Boxing Reform Act. It is for the 50 state commissions and around 20 Tribal Commissions. Although associate commissions eg some of the the Canadians may attend the convention they are not allowed to vote. I think though associate commissions are eligible to attend closed sessions of the convention but I'm not 100% on that. I have been to a few ABC conventions, they are a very well run organisation.
Thanks John.
I came across a link, however, at a further look it seems it's just a list of orgs that's signed up to the reform act, and not necessarily members of the abc.

http://abcboxing.com/Sanctioning_Organi ... th_FTC.pdf
Post Reply