Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by Like a Boss »

Image
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32966
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Fvck me - the WBA actually using common sense to reach a resolution. That's as close to an accusation of a boxer being spiked as you'll ever see, without actually coming out with the accusation.
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by Like a Boss »

Boxerbeetle wrote:Fvck me - the WBA actually using common sense to reach a resolution. That's as close to an accusation of a boxer being spiked as you'll ever see, without actually coming out with the accusation.
Exactly :TU:
broomy7s
Cruiserweight
Posts: 971
Joined: 19 May 2011, 07:53

Re: Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by broomy7s »

Glad for Browne and you'll never guess who's behind FRES OQUENDO in the rankings.......
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by Like a Boss »

broomy7s wrote:Glad for Browne and you'll never guess who's behind FRES OQUENDO in the rankings.......
....and factor in 'E' above ;-)
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by Like a Boss »

In summary the WBA have:

Modified their prior decision regarding Lucas Browne.

Allowed Browne to retain his top 5 WBA rating.

Determined it is unlikely Browne intentionally or voluntarily consumed the Clenbuterol in a single, small dose in the days leading up to the bout.

Determined Browne would not have gained any advantage from the Clenbuterol consumed.

Reiterated the doubts about drugs and drug testing in Russia.

Determined the title is now vacant.

Determined that within 120 days Browne will fight Oquendo for the vacant title.

If for any reason Oquendo is unable to fight Browne, Browne will instead fight the leading, available contender for the vacant title.
mullenman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1124
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 11:10

Re: Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by mullenman »

Is haye going to get a wba shot

It does not saying who's fighting for the title
dookus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4492
Joined: 17 May 2005, 06:00

Re: Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by dookus »

Better result for Browne than I expected. Who'd have thunk the WBA capable of something like due process?
nitro5912
Middleweight
Posts: 733
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 13:02

Re: Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by nitro5912 »

Does anyone know who the wba top 10 are?

A certain Mr hate isn't in the top 10 or just behind oquendo is he??
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by freddydoesdallas »

Seems like a very sensible resolution although still one that will mean some people will label Browne a drugs cheat as he's served a suspension. That should have been quashed.

Will this mean that the WBA will refuse to sanction fights in Russia for the time being?
dsimpson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 156
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 10:19

Re: Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by dsimpson »

Why have the WBA said he should fight Quendo though? Isn't Luis Ortiz ranked higher? He was the interim champion before Browne wasn't he?
Anzi
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1317
Joined: 13 Jan 2013, 18:29

Re: Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by Anzi »

This has questioned the validity of drug testing and corruption within, similar to the Vada situation with Golden boy.
Bodyshot3
Middleweight
Posts: 9791
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 15:19

Re: Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by Bodyshot3 »

Pleased for Lucas and also (strangely) for the WBA for actually reviewing things in detail and scientifically...there is hope.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32966
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by Boxerbeetle »

freddydoesdallas wrote:Seems like a very sensible resolution although still one that will mean some people will label Browne a drugs cheat as he's served a suspension. That should have been quashed.

Will this mean that the WBA will refuse to sanction fights in Russia for the time being?
I suppose they can't really quash it without proof of foul play though? They've done the sensible thing imo.
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by freddydoesdallas »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
freddydoesdallas wrote:Seems like a very sensible resolution although still one that will mean some people will label Browne a drugs cheat as he's served a suspension. That should have been quashed.

Will this mean that the WBA will refuse to sanction fights in Russia for the time being?
I suppose they can't really quash it without proof of foul play though? They've done the sensible thing imo.
I'd be pissed off if I was Browne. Lost my title, probably a fine, big money in defending the title and all this while the WBA are basically saying 'yeah you've been screwed'.
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by Like a Boss »

dsimpson wrote:Why have the WBA said he should fight Quendo though? Isn't Luis Ortiz ranked higher? He was the interim champion before Browne wasn't he?
Oquendo won the right to mandatory status in court.
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by Like a Boss »

mullenman wrote:Is haye going to get a wba shot

It does not saying who's fighting for the title
Browne and Oquendo are fighting for the title Chagaev used to hold.
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by Like a Boss »

freddydoesdallas wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
freddydoesdallas wrote:Seems like a very sensible resolution although still one that will mean some people will label Browne a drugs cheat as he's served a suspension. That should have been quashed.

Will this mean that the WBA will refuse to sanction fights in Russia for the time being?
I suppose they can't really quash it without proof of foul play though? They've done the sensible thing imo.
I'd be pissed off if I was Browne. Lost my title, probably a fine, big money in defending the title and all this while the WBA are basically saying 'yeah you've been screwed'.
:OhYes:
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by Wales »

Has Oquendo ever beat, like, anyone?

Fact Fury is actually WBA champ makes it all even more laughable
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by Like a Boss »

Image
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by Wales »

"Unlikely Browne intentionally ingested the drug clenbuterol as he would not have gained an advantage"

What a kop out by WBA
Firstly you either ingested clenbuterol or you didn't
Secondly clenbuterol gives you an advantage
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by Like a Boss »

Wales wrote:"Unlikely Browne intentionally ingested the drug clenbuterol as he would not have gained an advantage"

What a kop out by WBA
Firstly you either ingested clenbuterol or you didn't
Secondly clenbuterol gives you an advantage
The WBA sought expert opinion in the matter. Not the opinion of an anonymous forum poster.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by Wales »

Aye fair comment. Because clenbuterol won't give an athlete an advantage. Perhaps the the International Olympic Committee should use experts when deciding what to ban?

Contador was banned from cycling for 2 years for using it. Must've been an anonymous forum poster advising the IOC and world cycling organisation too.
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by Like a Boss »

Wales wrote:Aye fair comment. Because clenbuterol won't give an athlete an advantage. Perhaps the the International Olympic Committee should use experts when deciding what to ban?

Contador was banned from cycling for 2 years for using it. Must've been an anonymous forum poster advising the IOC and world cycling organisation too.
Go read the WBA finding properly :doh:
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Lucas Browne resolution released - WBA decision explained in full

Post by Wales »

The actual WBA finding says

"It is unlikely Browne intentionally or voluntarily ingested clenbuterol in a single small dose in the days leading up to the fight as it would not have gained an advantage, especially in the heavyweight division "

Newspaper says "WBA says it's unlikely Browne intentionally digested the drug as he would not have gained an advantage "

Somehow the second quote is more sinister
Post Reply