Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Realistic
Cruiserweight
Posts: 539
Joined: 20 May 2011, 10:06

Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by Realistic »

210lb March 4th in London.
Killer Blow
Welterweight
Posts: 513
Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07

Re: Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by Killer Blow »

So Haye will sit out until then? He clearly has no intention of going after the WBO.
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by freddydoesdallas »

Doesn't do anything at all for me
craigjenkins05
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 477
Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 11:03

Re: Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by craigjenkins05 »

Can't see Haye agreeing to a catchweight he doesn't need to he knows they will make the fight at heavy
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by Horse »

Why the long wait?

They've both got plenty of other big fights to be getting on with.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17104
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Haye will win whenever he wants, but I'm looking forward to it.
Southy1922
Super Lightweight
Posts: 106
Joined: 17 Oct 2016, 19:15

Re: Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by Southy1922 »

Catch weight at heavyweight? Disgrace. The way Big mouth bellew goes on, weight should be no issue. He acta as though king Kong would fall at his feet.

Gobsh1te
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Has this actually been announced?

Haye will make 210 pretty easily, then he'll knock Bellew's block off.

This reminds me a bit of McCrory (Glenn not Milton) against Lennox - he knew he'd get his head stoved in, but also knew it was by far the biggest payday out there for him, and in offchance he pulled off a victory, he'd be even better off.

Nothing to lose for Bellew, except consciousness.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by Horse »

Southy1922 wrote:Catch weight at heavyweight? Disgrace. The way Big mouth bellew goes on, weight should be no issue. He acta as though king Kong would fall at his feet.

Gobsh1te
Not a disgrace at all.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Horse wrote:
Southy1922 wrote:Catch weight at heavyweight? Disgrace. The way Big mouth bellew goes on, weight should be no issue. He acta as though king Kong would fall at his feet.

Gobsh1te
Not a disgrace at all.
For once we are in agreement, I think it's perfectly reasonable for Bellew and Haye to agree on a weight limit, Haye is clearly the bigger man, and could come in 30 lbs heavier than Bellew if there was no weight limit.

Don't see anything disgraceful here.
rio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1173
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 16:48

Re: Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by rio »

Horse wrote:
Southy1922 wrote:Catch weight at heavyweight? Disgrace. The way Big mouth bellew goes on, weight should be no issue. He acta as though king Kong would fall at his feet.

Gobsh1te
Not a disgrace at all.
It is. Heaveyweight is heavyweight. If he didn't want to fight him at his fighting weight he shouldn't have called him out. Don't remember haye complaining when he gave away 100 pounds against valuv and 30 odd pounds against klit. This will be an easy fight for hate similar to big Audley, but he should not do any sort of catchweight. Would actually like to see him offer the ultra confident bellew a 90-10 split to the winner. That would shut him up.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by lefty »

A pretty pointless fight in terms of both guys ambitions in the their respective divisions but it will make them both a lot of money so I understand the allure. The build up will be probably be equally amusing and irritating but the fight itself will be fun the short amount of time it lasts I'd imagine. I wouldn't completely write Bellew off in the matchup. He definietly hits hard enough to knock Haye out I think and Haye looks more hittable these days. His footspeed is noticeably slower I think.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by Horse »

rio wrote:It is. Heaveyweight is heavyweight. If he didn't want to fight him at his fighting weight he shouldn't have called him out. Don't remember haye complaining when he gave away 100 pounds against valuv and 30 odd pounds against klit. This will be an easy fight for hate similar to big Audley, but he should not do any sort of catchweight. Would actually like to see him offer the ultra confident bellew a 90-10 split to the winner. That would shut him up.
Why is a catchweight at heavyweight worse than in any other division?

90-10 split to the winner fights are never arranged. Haye offering Bellew that deal would be eye-rollingly pathetic. It will never happen, so why bother wasting people's time with that sort of 'offer'?
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7277
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by Oiky »

the build up will probably be comical. big money fight for both.

i like bellew and he has that punchers chance but i'd tip haye to win.
rio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1173
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 16:48

Re: Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by rio »

Horse wrote:
rio wrote:It is. Heaveyweight is heavyweight. If he didn't want to fight him at his fighting weight he shouldn't have called him out. Don't remember haye complaining when he gave away 100 pounds against valuv and 30 odd pounds against klit. This will be an easy fight for hate similar to big Audley, but he should not do any sort of catchweight. Would actually like to see him offer the ultra confident bellew a 90-10 split to the winner. That would shut him up.
Why is a catchweight at heavyweight worse than in any other division?

90-10 split to the winner fights are never arranged. Haye offering Bellew that deal would be eye-rollingly pathetic. It will never happen, so why bother wasting people's time with that sort of 'offer'?
Because everyone knows bellew is doing it for a pay day and really does not think he will win this would prove that. And you don't call someone out then tell them they can not fight at there natural weight. Bellew called out haye not the other way round so if he really wants the fight he moves up to heavyweight none of this catch weigh BS. If he didn't like it he should defend his cruiser against Bredis who he clearly does not fancy fighting
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by Horse »

rio wrote:Because everyone knows bellew is doing it for a pay day and really does not think he will win this would prove that. And you don't call someone out then tell them they can not fight at there natural weight. Bellew called out haye not the other way round so if he really wants the fight he moves up to heavyweight none of this catch weigh BS. If he didn't like it he should defend his cruiser against Bredis who he clearly does not fancy fighting
90-10 to the winner contracts don't happen, so it wouldn't prove anything.

Why bother getting a catchweight clause if he doesn't think that he can win?
rio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1173
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 16:48

Re: Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by rio »

Horse wrote:
rio wrote:Because everyone knows bellew is doing it for a pay day and really does not think he will win this would prove that. And you don't call someone out then tell them they can not fight at there natural weight. Bellew called out haye not the other way round so if he really wants the fight he moves up to heavyweight none of this catch weigh BS. If he didn't like it he should defend his cruiser against Bredis who he clearly does not fancy fighting
90-10 to the winner contracts don't happen, so it wouldn't prove anything.

Why bother getting a catchweight clause if he doesn't think that he can win?
Because he knows he has zero chance without the catch weight hes trying to even things up. But everyone knows hes doing it for the pay day and if hes not, if he really thinks he can win then a 90-10 split to the winner would probs double his career earnings to date in one night. Put it this way, I reckon haye would take that split and there would be a reason why tony would not. Also the B side does not make catch weight demands. A catchweight at heavy is ridiculous. If you dont want to play with the big boys then dont. As I said I dont remember haye asking for a catchweight against Valuv when he gave up 100 pounds, or against Audley, Chisora or Klitscho when he gave up 30/40 pounds so why would a nobody like Bellew dictate demands to Haye when Bellew called him out and is clearly the B side.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by Horse »

rio wrote:Because he knows he has zero chance without the catch weight hes trying to even things up. But everyone knows hes doing it for the pay day and if hes not, if he really thinks he can win then a 90-10 split to the winner would probs double his career earnings to date in one night. Put it this way, I reckon haye would take that split and there would be a reason why tony would not. Also the B side does not make catch weight demands. A catchweight at heavy is ridiculous. If you dont want to play with the big boys then dont. As I said I dont remember haye asking for a catchweight against Valuv when he gave up 100 pounds, or against Audley, Chisora or Klitscho when he gave up 30/40 pounds so why would a nobody like Bellew dictate demands to Haye when Bellew called him out and is clearly the B side.
What fights have ever been 90-10 to the winner fights? Has it ever happened?

It's not going to happen. Pointless talking about it.

Having a catchweight at heavyweight is no worse than in any other division.

Who cares what Haye has done? Haye was campaigning at heavyweight, so that's a different matter.

Bellew hasn't said that he plans to campaign at heavyweight has he? It makes sense to have this fight at a catchweight.
rio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1173
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 16:48

Re: Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by rio »

If he does not plan to fight at heavy he need to shut it then because that's where Haye fights! How many time have you seen a B side fighter ask the A side to move down in weight? It just does not happen. Irrelevant if a 90-10 to the winner has never happened before, there was a time when a catchweight fight never happened either. 1 time for everything.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by Horse »

rio wrote:If he does not plan to fight at heavy he need to shut it then because that's where Haye fights! How many time have you seen a B side fighter ask the A side to move down in weight? It just does not happen. Irrelevant if a 90-10 to the winner has never happened before, there was a time when a catchweight fight never happened either. 1 time for everything.
Bellew can negotiate terms because he brings a lot of money to the table and he is arguably Haye's best option.

The B-side can dictate terms whenever they can get away with it.

The 90-10 to the winner talk is just daft. Not going to happen, no point in talking about it.
rio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1173
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 16:48

Re: Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by rio »

Bellew brings nothing to the table apart from a decent pay day and an easy night. Tony wants the fight so he has to fight at heavy or stop talking about it. Klitscho, wilder, AJ or fury are far bigger fights that vs Bellew. Haye is only considering because it's a lot of £ for such an easy fight
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by Horse »

rio wrote:Bellew brings nothing to the table apart from a decent pay day and an easy night.
So, he brings a lot to the table then?
rio wrote:Tony wants the fight so he has to fight at heavy or stop talking about it.
No, he doesn't.
rio wrote:Klitscho, wilder, AJ or fury are far bigger fights that vs Bellew. Haye is only considering because it's a lot of £ for such an easy fight
Why doesn't he fight them then?
rio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1173
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 16:48

Re: Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by rio »

Horse wrote:
rio wrote:Bellew brings nothing to the table apart from a decent pay day and an easy night.
So, he brings a lot to the table then?

-Point taken. But Legacy or belt wise this is a nothing fight. Just an easy night. Will go down the same as vs Audley. Alot of hype and Hearn talking shite for a mismatch.
rio wrote:Tony wants the fight so he has to fight at heavy or stop talking about it.
No, he doesn't.

-He really does need to shut up if he does not want to fight Haye at Heavyweight where Haye has fought for 8 years. He will look like a bit of a pratt if he calls Haye out, Haye agrees then Tony bottles it if he does not accept a catch weight. He was the one who wanted the fight so he fights at Hayes weight. If Haye was the one calling him out it would be a different situation and Haye would have to work with Tony.
rio wrote:Klitscho, wilder, AJ or fury are far bigger fights that vs Bellew. Haye is only considering because it's a lot of £ for such an easy fight
Why doesn't he fight them then?
-He might
Southy1922
Super Lightweight
Posts: 106
Joined: 17 Oct 2016, 19:15

Re: Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by Southy1922 »

rio wrote:
Horse wrote:
Southy1922 wrote:Catch weight at heavyweight? Disgrace. The way Big mouth bellew goes on, weight should be no issue. He acta as though king Kong would fall at his feet.

Gobsh1te
Not a disgrace at all.
It is. Heaveyweight is heavyweight. If he didn't want to fight him at his fighting weight he shouldn't have called him out. Don't remember haye complaining when he gave away 100 pounds against valuv and 30 odd pounds against klit. This will be an easy fight for hate similar to big Audley, but he should not do any sort of catchweight. Would actually like to see him offer the ultra confident bellew a 90-10 split to the winner. That would shut him up.

My thoughts exactly. Albeit articulated more eloquently
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Bellew v Haye at catchweight

Post by Wales »

Only realistic real big money fight for Bellew, fair play to him for seemingly talking his way into it. Would get beaten for far less against top cruisers.

All the talk about Bellews power... never rated it. 18 stoppages in 28 fights tells a story.

Haye beats him handily. Although wouldn't be surprised if Haye pulled out and fucked Bellew over
Post Reply