Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings CLOSED
-
jezzamundo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3127
- Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11
Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings CLOSED
BWH Rankings as of 19 November 2016:
Champion in Recess: Tyson Fury
1. Wladimir Klitschko
2. Alexander Povetkin
3. Deontay Wilder
4. Luis Ortiz
5. Kubrat Pulev
6. Joseph Parker
7. Anthony Joshua
8. Bryant Jennings
9. Carlos Takam
10. Vyacheslav Glazkov
11. Lucas Browne
12. Bermane Stiverne
13. Artur Szpilka
14. Dereck Chisora
15. VACANT
Topic A - Who should fill the vacant #15 ranking?
My vote: Christian Hammer
Note: You can vote for any fighter, whose last contested fight was at heavyweight within the last 12 months. If no fight receives 50% +1 of the vote, a second topic will be made to vote on all of the nominated fighters.
Champion in Recess: Tyson Fury
1. Wladimir Klitschko
2. Alexander Povetkin
3. Deontay Wilder
4. Luis Ortiz
5. Kubrat Pulev
6. Joseph Parker
7. Anthony Joshua
8. Bryant Jennings
9. Carlos Takam
10. Vyacheslav Glazkov
11. Lucas Browne
12. Bermane Stiverne
13. Artur Szpilka
14. Dereck Chisora
15. VACANT
Topic A - Who should fill the vacant #15 ranking?
My vote: Christian Hammer
Note: You can vote for any fighter, whose last contested fight was at heavyweight within the last 12 months. If no fight receives 50% +1 of the vote, a second topic will be made to vote on all of the nominated fighters.
Last edited by jezzamundo on 26 Nov 2016, 19:21, edited 1 time in total.
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9457
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Andy Ruiz jr
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Ordinarily Hammer would be a disagreeable choice, but he is coming off a decent win so ill second the notion.
Lets not waste too much time with this, there a lot of heavyweight bouts coming up in the next couple months, the rankings will sort themselves out and Hammer will likely get squeezed out soon enough.
Lets not waste too much time with this, there a lot of heavyweight bouts coming up in the next couple months, the rankings will sort themselves out and Hammer will likely get squeezed out soon enough.
-
Freedom2013
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 3879
- Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Christian Hammer
-
HyacinthusTurnipseed
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: 11 Dec 2010, 16:34
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
David Haye. Crap comeback opposition or not he'd crush half the guys on the list without breaking a sweat. Would Christian Hammer even be considered a good opponent for him?
-
jezzamundo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3127
- Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
For the record, I agree Haye likely beats Hammer, but I go more on quality of wins and strength of opposition.HyacinthusTurnipseed wrote:David Haye. Crap comeback opposition or not he'd crush half the guys on the list without breaking a sweat. Would Christian Hammer even be considered a good opponent for him?
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
So you don't look who's the best boxer, but who proved it the most? In that case the boxrec rankings are perfect, or Charles Martin should still be ranked above the possibly soon to be removed Glazkov.jezzamundo wrote:For the record, I agree Haye likely beats Hammer, but I go more on quality of wins and strength of opposition.HyacinthusTurnipseed wrote:David Haye. Crap comeback opposition or not he'd crush half the guys on the list without breaking a sweat. Would Christian Hammer even be considered a good opponent for him?
-
jezzamundo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3127
- Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Who-beats-who is definitely a factor in deciding where people should be ranked, but it's highly subjective. For instance, I think Haye probably beats Hammer, but it's not the foregone conclusion that some are making it out to be - Chisora was making Haye work hard in their fight and could conceivably have won had he lasted a few more rounds. I'm not sure Hammer is so much worse than Chisora and I'm not sure Haye is as good as he was then, so a Hammer win wouldn't be out of the question. On recent resume, Hammer is clearly ahead, so that's where my vote goes.asdfjkl wrote:So you don't look who's the best boxer, but who proved it the most? In that case the boxrec rankings are perfect, or Charles Martin should still be ranked above the possibly soon to be removed Glazkov.jezzamundo wrote:For the record, I agree Haye likely beats Hammer, but I go more on quality of wins and strength of opposition.HyacinthusTurnipseed wrote:David Haye. Crap comeback opposition or not he'd crush half the guys on the list without breaking a sweat. Would Christian Hammer even be considered a good opponent for him?
The BoxRec ratings are pretty good, but there will always be results that are given more or less weight than they deserve, which is where voting based rankings like these are better. Although it was a retirement win, I did vote for Charles Martin to be ranked ahead of Glazkov, but I was in the minority.
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Johan Duhaupas
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
I would not be too sad to see some changes on the lower part of this list. Szpilka, Chisora and Stiverne all seem pretty weak currently.
Hammer, Ruiz and Duhaupas all could be on the list. Good argument could be made for anyone of them.
My vote goes to Haye.
Hes opposition has been abysmal lately and hes been off for long time. Still he seems to bee in good condition and sharp. I think hes form and old achievements warrants spot on the list.
Hammer, Ruiz and Duhaupas all could be on the list. Good argument could be made for anyone of them.
My vote goes to Haye.
Hes opposition has been abysmal lately and hes been off for long time. Still he seems to bee in good condition and sharp. I think hes form and old achievements warrants spot on the list.
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Make a case for Andy Ruiz being in the top 15? Impossible and same for the Chinese Zhang Junlong in the top 15 having face one top 100 opponent who was a cruiserweight. Haye makes some sense on the grounds of subjectively he beats a lot of those in the top 15.
Hammer has far more right than Chisora whose only real claim is he went all twelve with Pulev, which then brings back Malik Scott who you voted out.
Hammer has far more right than Chisora whose only real claim is he went all twelve with Pulev, which then brings back Malik Scott who you voted out.
-
Killer Blow
- Welterweight
- Posts: 513
- Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Johann Duhaupas.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Arias and Gavern aren't cruiserweights.Lennox wrote:Make a case for Andy Ruiz being in the top 15? Impossible and same for the Chinese Zhang Junlong in the top 15 having face one top 100 opponent who was a cruiserweight. Haye makes some sense on the grounds of subjectively he beats a lot of those in the top 15.
Hammer has far more right than Chisora whose only real claim is he went all twelve with Pulev, which then brings back Malik Scott who you voted out.
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Correct, but they were not top 100 heavyweights when they fought Zhang. Zhang fought Shaun Cox who was a cruiserweight and ranked 35 at the time. www.premierboxingorganisation.com/heavyweight-200asdfjkl wrote:Arias and Gavern aren't cruiserweights.Lennox wrote:Make a case for Andy Ruiz being in the top 15? Impossible and same for the Chinese Zhang Junlong in the top 15 having face one top 100 opponent who was a cruiserweight. Haye makes some sense on the grounds of subjectively he beats a lot of those in the top 15.
Hammer has far more right than Chisora whose only real claim is he went all twelve with Pulev, which then brings back Malik Scott who you voted out.
At 35 Zhang needs to make a move, it is pretty weak from 10 downwards in my opinion, he should be fighting people top 50 ranked or at least top 100 someone that does not suggests to me he is not really capable, but I have not seen him really other than a couple of clips.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Wrong, they were top 100 at the time and Arias wasn't KOed for over a decade I thought and only AJ showed a similar result against Gavern.Lennox wrote:Correct, but they were not top 100 heavyweights when they fought Zhang. Zhang fought Shaun Cox who was a cruiserweight and ranked 35 at the time. http://www.premierboxingorganisation.co ... weight-200asdfjkl wrote:Arias and Gavern aren't cruiserweights.Lennox wrote:Make a case for Andy Ruiz being in the top 15? Impossible and same for the Chinese Zhang Junlong in the top 15 having face one top 100 opponent who was a cruiserweight. Haye makes some sense on the grounds of subjectively he beats a lot of those in the top 15.
Hammer has far more right than Chisora whose only real claim is he went all twelve with Pulev, which then brings back Malik Scott who you voted out.
At 35 Zhang needs to make a move, it is pretty weak from 10 downwards in my opinion, he should be fighting people top 50 ranked or at least top 100 someone that does not suggests to me he is not really capable, but I have not seen him really other than a couple of clips.
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
George Arias was 107 at the time of the fight.
Jason Gavern was 115 at the time of the fight.
They could have been in boxrec's top 100.
Do you still want to press your case that Zhang deserves that top 15 slot?
Jason Gavern was 115 at the time of the fight.
They could have been in boxrec's top 100.
Do you still want to press your case that Zhang deserves that top 15 slot?
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Hypothetical matchups shouldn't be taken into consideration, especially after a four year layoff for Haye.HyacinthusTurnipseed wrote:David Haye. Crap comeback opposition or not he'd crush half the guys on the list without breaking a sweat. Would Christian Hammer even be considered a good opponent for him?
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
I think (we) need guidance on how to rate, is it objectve or subjective. If its subjective my 15 would be:DannyMCR wrote:Hypothetical matchups shouldn't be taken into consideration, especially after a four year layoff for Haye.HyacinthusTurnipseed wrote:David Haye. Crap comeback opposition or not he'd crush half the guys on the list without breaking a sweat. Would Christian Hammer even be considered a good opponent for him?
1. Joshua
2. Klitschko
3. Wilder
4. Povetkin
5. Haye
6. Parker
7. Pulev
8. Ortiz
9. Stiverne
10. Takam
11. Glazkov
12. Duahappas
13. Spilka
14. Hammer
15. Teper
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
..I have a problem making a case for anyone..maybe just leave it open for the time being...
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Andy Ruiz
Because roll them all down a mountain and I'm sure he wins handily.
Because roll them all down a mountain and I'm sure he wins handily.
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Well, based on his theory, we may as well stick Vitali in the top fiveLennox wrote:I think (we) need guidance on how to rate, is it objectve or subjective. If its subjective my 15 would be:DannyMCR wrote:Hypothetical matchups shouldn't be taken into consideration, especially after a four year layoff for Haye.HyacinthusTurnipseed wrote:David Haye. Crap comeback opposition or not he'd crush half the guys on the list without breaking a sweat. Would Christian Hammer even be considered a good opponent for him?
1. Joshua
2. Klitschko
3. Wilder
4. Povetkin
5. Haye
6. Parker
7. Pulev
8. Ortiz
9. Stiverne
10. Takam
11. Glazkov
12. Duahappas
13. Spilka
14. Hammer
15. Teper