Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Jip
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2518
Joined: 04 Nov 2016, 03:30

Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by Jip »

lets be clear about it.

ortiz wasnt impressiv in his last 2 fights. there is a reason behind it. he changed promoter, moved from sunny florida to rainy cold england. he gets shi%&y money to fight c-f level opponents. he simply had a lot of stuff going on, couldnt train properly and his opponents werent a big goal to achieve, than there is age.

give him 4 month of proper training, give him a big money fight against a big name and we'll see the ortiz version destroyed jennings, thompson. this version parker, josh and wilder would have a problem against. cause wilder is behind training, parker totaly failed to impress and josh never faced somebody on the level of ortiz.
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by ValMar »

Jip wrote:lets be clear about it.

ortiz wasnt impressiv in his last 2 fights. there is a reason behind it. he changed promoter, moved from sunny florida to rainy cold england. he gets shi%&y money to fight c-f level opponents. he simply had a lot of stuff going on, couldnt train properly and his opponents werent a big goal to achieve, than there is age.

give him 4 month of proper training, give him a big money fight against a big name and we'll see the ortiz version destroyed jennings, thompson. this version parker, josh and wilder would have a problem against. cause wilder is behind training, parker totaly failed to impress and josh never faced somebody on the level of ortiz.
Jip, I hope you are right. :TU:
Ron C
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 254
Joined: 08 Jan 2008, 00:01

Re: Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by Ron C »

Good post. I agree with this!
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by Enlightened-One »

Jip wrote:lets be clear about it.

give him 4 month of proper training, give him a big money fight against a big name and we'll see the ortiz version destroyed jennings, thompson. this version parker, josh and wilder would have a problem against. cause wilder is behind training, parker totaly failed to impress and josh never faced somebody on the level of ortiz.
Why would anyone grant Ortiz an opportunity to engage in a big money fight against a big name on the back of his disappointing performances against Scott and Allen?

Ortiz has to realise that he has to look impressive against the "little" names in order to generate enough economic demand to see him share the ring against the "big" names.
man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

Re: Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by man »

so the boxrec no1 heavy weight in the world
is not really up to a really big fight. something
is profoundly wrong about this division.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by Badhusker »

Enlightened-One wrote:
Jip wrote:lets be clear about it.

give him 4 month of proper training, give him a big money fight against a big name and we'll see the ortiz version destroyed jennings, thompson. this version parker, josh and wilder would have a problem against. cause wilder is behind training, parker totaly failed to impress and josh never faced somebody on the level of ortiz.
Why would anyone grant Ortiz an opportunity to engage in a big money fight against a big name on the back of his disappointing performances against Scott and Allen?

Ortiz has to realise that he has to look impressive against the "little" names in order to generate enough economic demand to see him share the ring against the "big" names.

If everything was based on your last performance, Wlad would never get a title shot like he is getting against Joshua.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by Enlightened-One »

Badhusker wrote:
Enlightened-One wrote:
Jip wrote:lets be clear about it.

give him 4 month of proper training, give him a big money fight against a big name and we'll see the ortiz version destroyed jennings, thompson. this version parker, josh and wilder would have a problem against. cause wilder is behind training, parker totaly failed to impress and josh never faced somebody on the level of ortiz.
Why would anyone grant Ortiz an opportunity to engage in a big money fight against a big name on the back of his disappointing performances against Scott and Allen?

Ortiz has to realise that he has to look impressive against the "little" names in order to generate enough economic demand to see him share the ring against the "big" names.
If everything was based on your last performance, Wlad would never get a title shot like he is getting against Joshua.
Agreed, but Ortiz has been on a poor run of form for multiple fights and has only just joined a UK promoter where the casual British fan base are unfamiliar with his talents. If they're responsible for funding any "big" fights involving Ortiz, they surely need to have to be motivated somehow to pay for it.

My argument is more about economics rather than who is or isn't deserving of big fights.
Jip
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2518
Joined: 04 Nov 2016, 03:30

Re: Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by Jip »

Enlightened-One wrote:
Badhusker wrote:
Enlightened-One wrote: Why would anyone grant Ortiz an opportunity to engage in a big money fight against a big name on the back of his disappointing performances against Scott and Allen?

Ortiz has to realise that he has to look impressive against the "little" names in order to generate enough economic demand to see him share the ring against the "big" names.
If everything was based on your last performance, Wlad would never get a title shot like he is getting against Joshua.
Agreed, but Ortiz has been on a poor run of form for multiple fights and has only just joined a UK promoter where the casual British fan base are unfamiliar with his talents. If they're responsible for funding any "big" fights involving Ortiz, they surely need to have to be motivated somehow to pay for it.

My argument is more about economics rather than who is or isn't deserving of big fights.
got your point. but everything is better also economics than molina, martin or breazale :lol:
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by Enlightened-One »

Jip wrote:
Enlightened-One wrote:
Badhusker wrote: If everything was based on your last performance, Wlad would never get a title shot like he is getting against Joshua.
Agreed, but Ortiz has been on a poor run of form for multiple fights and has only just joined a UK promoter where the casual British fan base are unfamiliar with his talents. If they're responsible for funding any "big" fights involving Ortiz, they surely need to have to be motivated somehow to pay for it.

My argument is more about economics rather than who is or isn't deserving of big fights.
got your point. but everything is better also economics than molina, martin or breazale :lol:
Back to economics again, I’m afraid…

In the context of the names you’ve mentioned, British casual fight fans are actually paying to see Anthony Joshua fight, because the guys you’ve named are mainly unheralded fighters requiring small paydays that aren’t considered a legitimate threat to the UK fan favourite.

For example: if Anthony Joshua was to engage in a bout against Luis Ortiz, who is ranked above him by ESPN and The Ring, then he’s going to demand a career-best purse, because the likelihood of defeat is greater than he has ever faced.

However, if the recent memory of Luis Ortiz to British fight fans is one of tedium, then they aren’t going to that motivated to part with their hard-earned cash to pay the price of a PPV to see the Ciuban face AJ.
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by lillywhite14 »

Charles Martin became a millionaire who never had to work again for his small payday to defend against Joshua!

Obviously Martin had something Joshua and Hearn wanted so he got rewarded for it. I'd like to think signing Ortiz and showcasing him over here is to build a potential Joshua mega fight. So far, Ortiz hasn't kept his side of the deal at all.
That or Ortiz has been signed to deal with any potential rival that Hearn doesn't want Joshua in with. That seems ridiculous to me though
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by BitPlayer »

man wrote:so the boxrec no1 heavy weight in the world
is not really up to a really big fight. something
is profoundly wrong about this division.
Yeah, Wlad, Fury, and Povetkin have been out for various reason and got dropped for inativity.
man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

Re: Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by man »

BitPlayer wrote:
man wrote:so the boxrec no1 heavy weight in the world
is not really up to a really big fight. something
is profoundly wrong about this division.
Yeah, Wlad, Fury, and Povetkin have been out for various reason and got dropped for inativity.
i know. still, when i look at the rankings
right now, they make me just ... sad.
something is profoundly wrong in this
division. i understand all the reasons
given, and still ... this is pathetic.

who were the last three opponents
of the current top three guys? it is not
even ridiculous anymore. alle these guys
are no champions, these are ... clowns.
and the biggest of them all has a nervous
breakdown ...

goodness.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by Tanzio »

Ortiz is not top 5, IMO.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

I never had him top 3. We'll see what happens when he fights chisora, might be trouble.
sharpei_louis
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 643
Joined: 22 Nov 2007, 08:30

Re: Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by sharpei_louis »

I always seem to have this risk v reward debate with my friends though.

The problem with the heavyweights is the marketability as much as the talent.

The decent fighters like Ortiz need to pick up a title, or make themselves popular, otherwise there's no reason to fight them. Without being ticket sellers or having something the top guys want, why would you do it? I appreciate people seeking sporting challenges, but at the end of the day in a sport where one shot can ruin your life, it has to be worthwhile financially.

Scott and Allen are both fringe-known to fans in Britain, with reasonably recognisable names. It was important for Ortiz to look great in both fights and build a bit of momentum to get something bigger. I'm a bit disappointed he hasn't done that. Chisora and Whyte both did more for their chances with their performances just by being involved in an exciting fight.
ClivePatrickLyons
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2811
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10

Re: Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by ClivePatrickLyons »

Not anywhere near top 3 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by crusader »

ClivePatrickLyons wrote:Not anywhere near top 3 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Who would you have ahead of him?

He's looked very lacklustre in his last two, but it's hard for me to find enough names to put him far off the top 5.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by crusader »

Is Fury still active? If so, he's definitely ahead of Ortiz

Guys like Haye and Parker are very arguable though IMO.
ClivePatrickLyons
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2811
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10

Re: Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by ClivePatrickLyons »

ginty wrote:
crusader wrote:
ClivePatrickLyons wrote:Not anywhere near top 3 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Who would you have ahead of him?
Fury ..wlad.. Wilder...Joshua... Haye...povetkin ...Parker


If you think he is then that's ok mate :TU:
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by crusader »

I don't think he's top 3, but which active fighters should clearly be ranked ahead of him?
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

I think wlad, Joshua & wilder are clearly ahead of him. Several guys can pop in at #4, including Ortiz.
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by jezzamundo »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I think wlad, Joshua & wilder are clearly ahead of him. Several guys can pop in at #4, including Ortiz.
It depends on whether you're talking about best or most accomplished. I think Ortiz is pretty clearly a better boxer than Wilder, although Wilder's superior athleticism and size would give him a good chance of outboxing him from the outside.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

jezzamundo wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I think wlad, Joshua & wilder are clearly ahead of him. Several guys can pop in at #4, including Ortiz.
It depends on whether you're talking about best or most accomplished. I think Ortiz is pretty clearly a better boxer than Wilder, although Wilder's superior athleticism and size would give him a good chance of outboxing him from the outside.
wlad is the only heavyweight with serious accomplishments, you pretty much have to rate heavyweights with your eyes.
bigman1968
Super Welterweight
Posts: 672
Joined: 24 Jul 2014, 03:45

Re: Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by bigman1968 »

man wrote:so the boxrec no1 heavy weight in the world
is not really up to a really big fight. something
is profoundly wrong about this division.
That's mostly raiting's problem...and the inactivity of most of the HW top guys...
man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

Re: Ortiz still amongs the 3 best heavyweights!

Post by man »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I think wlad, Joshua & wilder are clearly ahead of him. Several guys can pop in at #4, including Ortiz.
that's how i see it.
Post Reply