"First Birmingham World Champion"
"First Birmingham World Champion"
Respect to Yafai for a great performance, and this is no dig at him. But Sky's glossing over history annoys me. The first modern Birmingham fighter to hold a recognised world belt was Wayne Elcock when he won't he WBU Middleweight Championship. It is a world belt regardless of what order people favour their world belts. Some great fighters have won WBU's. So technically Sky are talking shite.
Same with football. You'd think it began in 1992.
Let's not forget boxers of the past to bled for our entertainment.
Same with football. You'd think it began in 1992.
Let's not forget boxers of the past to bled for our entertainment.
-
el_grande_mauro_mina
- Lightweight
- Posts: 11215
- Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54
Re: "First Birmingham World Champion"
Charley Mitchell - a nemisis of John L. Sullivan was a Brummie world (bareknuckle) boxing champion, back in the 19th century. 
Re: "First Birmingham World Champion"
WBU isn't a legitimate world strap. Lawrence Murphy held the same title as Wayne Elcock fgs!SAPFO wrote:Respect to Yafai for a great performance, and this is no dig at him. But Sky's glossing over history annoys me. The first modern Birmingham fighter to hold a recognised world belt was Wayne Elcock when he won't he WBU Middleweight Championship. It is a world belt regardless of what order people favour their world belts. Some great fighters have won WBU's. So technically Sky are talking shite.
Same with football. You'd think it began in 1992.
Let's not forget boxers of the past to bled for our entertainment.
-
craigjenkins05
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 477
- Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 11:03
Re: "First Birmingham World Champion"
There's no way anyone considers the WBU a legitimate world title
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17104
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: "First Birmingham World Champion"
Stuarty30 wrote:WBU isn't a legitimate world strap. Lawrence Murphy held the same title as Wayne Elcock fgs!SAPFO wrote:Respect to Yafai for a great performance, and this is no dig at him. But Sky's glossing over history annoys me. The first modern Birmingham fighter to hold a recognised world belt was Wayne Elcock when he won't he WBU Middleweight Championship. It is a world belt regardless of what order people favour their world belts. Some great fighters have won WBU's. So technically Sky are talking shite.
Same with football. You'd think it began in 1992.
Let's not forget boxers of the past to bled for our entertainment.
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: "First Birmingham World Champion"
Lee Mcallister is a 2 weight undefeated world champion also.Stuarty30 wrote:WBU isn't a legitimate world strap. Lawrence Murphy held the same title as Wayne Elcock fgs!SAPFO wrote:Respect to Yafai for a great performance, and this is no dig at him. But Sky's glossing over history annoys me. The first modern Birmingham fighter to hold a recognised world belt was Wayne Elcock when he won't he WBU Middleweight Championship. It is a world belt regardless of what order people favour their world belts. Some great fighters have won WBU's. So technically Sky are talking shite.
Same with football. You'd think it began in 1992.
Let's not forget boxers of the past to bled for our entertainment.
Re: "First Birmingham World Champion"
if we're talking about undefeated world middleweight champions we've got to put lester jacobs in there.
Re: "First Birmingham World Champion"
Well Sky peddled that shit for about 15 years...but I get yaStuarty30 wrote:WBU isn't a legitimate world strap. Lawrence Murphy held the same title as Wayne Elcock fgs!SAPFO wrote:Respect to Yafai for a great performance, and this is no dig at him. But Sky's glossing over history annoys me. The first modern Birmingham fighter to hold a recognised world belt was Wayne Elcock when he won't he WBU Middleweight Championship. It is a world belt regardless of what order people favour their world belts. Some great fighters have won WBU's. So technically Sky are talking shite.
Same with football. You'd think it began in 1992.
Let's not forget boxers of the past to bled for our entertainment.
Re: "First Birmingham World Champion"
Warren and Eddie Hearn (think Hearn was putting on IBO though) definitely encouraged the fringe world titles.
Had the feeling Sky was tolerating rather than pushing it.
Had the feeling Sky was tolerating rather than pushing it.
Re: "First Birmingham World Champion"
Come on, we can't complain about the number of bullshit world titles in the sport and then say Yafai isn't the first from Birmingham because a WBU belt counts.
-
maverick23
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 10375
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20
Re: "First Birmingham World Champion"
I don't think Eddie's ever been involved with IBO title fights. Barry may have though.Autobarn wrote:Warren and Eddie Hearn (think Hearn was putting on IBO though) definitely encouraged the fringe world titles.
Had the feeling Sky was tolerating rather than pushing it.
-
The Insider
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21
Re: "First Birmingham World Champion"
Owen MoranSAPFO wrote:Respect to Yafai for a great performance, and this is no dig at him. But Sky's glossing over history annoys me. The first modern Birmingham fighter to hold a recognised world belt was Wayne Elcock when he won't he WBU Middleweight Championship. It is a world belt regardless of what order people favour their world belts. Some great fighters have won WBU's. So technically Sky are talking shite.
Same with football. You'd think it began in 1992.
Let's not forget boxers of the past to bled for our entertainment.
-
dr_devious
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5349
- Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19
Re: "First Birmingham World Champion"
Mitchell wasn't world champ, he lost and drew with John L and lost in round 3 to James Corbett.Fat Git wrote:Charley Mitchell - a nemisis of John L. Sullivan was a Brummie world (bareknuckle) boxing champion, back in the 19th century.
Great fighter though, was a middleweight and gave Sullivan lots of trouble in both fights