Berchelt vs. Miura

Post Reply
Cutman Scabbers
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2313
Joined: 05 Jun 2008, 18:15

Berchelt vs. Miura

Post by Cutman Scabbers »

In round 8 the referee gave Berchelt time to recover from rabbit punches.

I've seen that happen for low blows, but never for rabbit punches.

It that part of the rules? Referee's discretion?
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23073
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Berchelt vs. Miura

Post by handsofstone »

Im not certain but i'd imagine any illegal blow would merit a time out??
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Berchelt vs. Miura

Post by Badhusker »

Why no talk of Berchelt vs Lomanchenko? It seems like the logical fight to make for both right now.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46481
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Berchelt vs. Miura

Post by gilgamesh »

Badhusker wrote:Why no talk of Berchelt vs Lomanchenko? It seems like the logical fight to make for both right now.
I'd be down.

Berchelt vs Salido
Salido vs Lomachenko 2
Lomachenko vs Berchelt
Lomachenko vs Jezreel Corrales
Lomachenko vs Gervonta Davis

Or any combination of any of these names. You almost can't go wrong at 130. Just match any of these guys up and you got good or at least interesting fights.

I wouldn't mind seeing Robinson Castellanos get some more opportunities either. I thought he gave as good as he got in his loss to Jezreel Corrales the other night, that on top of his upset win over Gamboa suggests he's not to be taken lightly these days.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Berchelt vs. Miura

Post by Badhusker »

gilgamesh wrote:
Badhusker wrote:Why no talk of Berchelt vs Lomanchenko? It seems like the logical fight to make for both right now.
I'd be down.

Berchelt vs Salido
Salido vs Lomachenko 2
Lomachenko vs Berchelt
Lomachenko vs Jezreel Corrales
Lomachenko vs Gervonta Davis

Or any combination of any of these names. You almost can't go wrong at 130. Just match any of these guys up and you got good or at least interesting fights.

I wouldn't mind seeing Robinson Castellanos get some more opportunities either. I thought he gave as good as he got in his loss to Jezreel Corrales the other night, that on top of his upset win over Gamboa suggests he's not to be taken lightly these days.
If any of the guys you mentioned are with Top Rank, we will probably see it. If not, it is doubtful anytime soon. I think Lomo will go up to 135 soon if he can't get a top fight there.

They will have to really pay Salido to fight Lomo again, because he knows he would get his ass handed to him. Corrales looks good, a little unorthodox, but think Lomo handles him easily. The best fight is probably Davis, but a year or two from now I think before they let him fight Lomo. Probably smart.
Mexi-Box
Welterweight
Posts: 3963
Joined: 24 Jan 2016, 16:19

Re: Berchelt vs. Miura

Post by Mexi-Box »

Badhusker wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Badhusker wrote:Why no talk of Berchelt vs Lomanchenko? It seems like the logical fight to make for both right now.
I'd be down.

Berchelt vs Salido
Salido vs Lomachenko 2
Lomachenko vs Berchelt
Lomachenko vs Jezreel Corrales
Lomachenko vs Gervonta Davis

Or any combination of any of these names. You almost can't go wrong at 130. Just match any of these guys up and you got good or at least interesting fights.

I wouldn't mind seeing Robinson Castellanos get some more opportunities either. I thought he gave as good as he got in his loss to Jezreel Corrales the other night, that on top of his upset win over Gamboa suggests he's not to be taken lightly these days.
If any of the guys you mentioned are with Top Rank, we will probably see it. If not, it is doubtful anytime soon. I think Lomo will go up to 135 soon if he can't get a top fight there.

They will have to really pay Salido to fight Lomo again, because he knows he would get his ass handed to him. Corrales looks good, a little unorthodox, but think Lomo handles him easily. The best fight is probably Davis, but a year or two from now I think before they let him fight Lomo. Probably smart.
I actually think Berchelt and Vargas are the only ones able to give Lomachenko problems. Davis is way too damn sloppy and wild. He'd get a worse beating than the Axe Man.
Lackeos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3598
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:05

Re: Berchelt vs. Miura

Post by Lackeos »

Badhusker wrote:Why no talk of Berchelt vs Lomanchenko? It seems like the logical fight to make for both right now.
I had always considered the Berchelt - Miura and Corrales - Castellanos fights as being significant for the potential challengers to Lomachenko that they could offer up. Berchelt's boxrec rating is now almost 200 points higher than anyone Lomachenko has beaten. Although, Berchelt is still young, and I wouldn't be opposed to Berchelt notching yet another win against someone like Corrales before he goes after Lomachenko.
caldo2025
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 07:37

Re: Berchelt vs. Miura

Post by caldo2025 »

Was anyone else disappointed with Berchelt's performance Saturday night? I was really looking forward to seeing this kid again because he was so fantastic against Vargas that he actually gave me hope that he'd be able to compete with Loma. But fought scared the whole night IMO. Against Vargas, he was an animal. In this one, he was way too timid. Loma would have demolished him. I was bummed out to see it.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Berchelt vs. Miura

Post by Counter-puncher »

caldo2025 wrote:Was anyone else disappointed with Berchelt's performance Saturday night? I was really looking forward to seeing this kid again because he was so fantastic against Vargas that he actually gave me hope that he'd be able to compete with Loma. But fought scared the whole night IMO. Against Vargas, he was an animal. In this one, he was way too timid. Loma would have demolished him. I was bummed out to see it.
strange criticism

Miura's only chance of winning was a brawl, criticising Berchelt for not giving him one is kindof odd. thats boxing for the smart fighters, you do what your opponent doesn't want/ don't do what he does want.
caldo2025
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 07:37

Re: Berchelt vs. Miura

Post by caldo2025 »

Counter-puncher wrote:
caldo2025 wrote:Was anyone else disappointed with Berchelt's performance Saturday night? I was really looking forward to seeing this kid again because he was so fantastic against Vargas that he actually gave me hope that he'd be able to compete with Loma. But fought scared the whole night IMO. Against Vargas, he was an animal. In this one, he was way too timid. Loma would have demolished him. I was bummed out to see it.
strange criticism

Miura's only chance of winning was a brawl, criticising Berchelt for not giving him one is kindof odd. thats boxing for the smart fighters, you do what your opponent doesn't want/ don't do what he does want.
It is a strange criticism and that's why I was wondering if anyone felt that way after watching it. It's probably unfair seeing that the kid almost won every round but still, I really expected more and had been looking forward to seeing him fight again after Vargas. It's a strange criticism indeed but when you consider that this fight was supposed to serve as a build up to a Loma/Berchelt fight, I think it failed miserably in doing that.

HBO was clearly trying to build up a Loma/Berchelt buzz and no one is talking about that this week. So i'm not the only one disappointed I guess so it can't be THAT wrong.
world ranked
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2199
Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21

Re: Berchelt vs. Miura

Post by world ranked »

People was saying this was card fight of the year possibilities. The card was underwhelming the hype train was wrong.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Berchelt vs. Miura

Post by crusader »

I wouldn't say it was a hype job as a card, because on paper it looked good and the fighters' abilities and styles seemed to make entertaining fights likely. No one has a crystal ball and it was a hard card to fault ahead of time...
Cutman Scabbers
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2313
Joined: 05 Jun 2008, 18:15

Re: Berchelt vs. Miura

Post by Cutman Scabbers »

world ranked wrote:People was saying this was card fight of the year possibilities. The card was underwhelming the hype train was wrong.

Corrales vs. Castellanos was exciting! The fight of the night.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23073
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Berchelt vs. Miura

Post by handsofstone »

Berchelt/Miura wasn't the humdinger I expected and that was disappointing but if anything my estimation of Berchelt has gone up, he showed us he can box to a 12 round plan without wavering, he's always got that power and tenacity in the locker if he needs it, he's gonna take some beating
world ranked
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2199
Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21

Re: Berchelt vs. Miura

Post by world ranked »

Cutman Scabbers wrote:
world ranked wrote:People was saying this was card fight of the year possibilities. The card was underwhelming the hype train was wrong.

Corrales vs. Castellanos was exciting! The fight of the night.
It wasn't really exciting. Just because you have knockdowns doesn't make it exciting and the ending sucked.
Mexi-Box
Welterweight
Posts: 3963
Joined: 24 Jan 2016, 16:19

Re: Berchelt vs. Miura

Post by Mexi-Box »

world ranked wrote:
Cutman Scabbers wrote:
world ranked wrote:People was saying this was card fight of the year possibilities. The card was underwhelming the hype train was wrong.

Corrales vs. Castellanos was exciting! The fight of the night.
It wasn't really exciting. Just because you have knockdowns doesn't make it exciting and the ending sucked.
They went toe-to-toe at times, especially for a fight that no one gave Castellanos a chance in. Castellanos came in as a nobody against an opponent with a 10 lb. weight advantage. It was the fight of the night.
Cutman Scabbers
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2313
Joined: 05 Jun 2008, 18:15

Re: Berchelt vs. Miura

Post by Cutman Scabbers »

Mexi-Box wrote:
world ranked wrote:
Cutman Scabbers wrote:

Corrales vs. Castellanos was exciting! The fight of the night.
It wasn't really exciting. Just because you have knockdowns doesn't make it exciting and the ending sucked.
They went toe-to-toe at times, especially for a fight that no one gave Castellanos a chance in. Castellanos came in as a nobody against an opponent with a 10 lb. weight advantage. It was the fight of the night.
Agreed! :TU:
Post Reply