Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Which are you watching live?

Poll ended at 09 Dec 2017, 11:02

ESPN: Loma-Rigo
26
93%
HBO: Salido-Roman
2
7%
 
Total votes: 28

Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101507
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Looks like HBO and ESPN are going head to head this weekend. I believe less people have access to HBO than ESPN.. Being from the UK, I'm not sure if they're showing Salido-Roman here. But I wanted to ask the US boxing fan across the pond.

Which fight are you tuning in to?


Some are saying Loma-Rigo will be a boring as hell chess match etc. But I doubt that's a reason why anyone won't tune in.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by Tanzio »

Both, of course.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101507
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Tanzio wrote: 05 Dec 2017, 11:20 Both, of course.
You gonna be flipping channels?
Mexi-Box
Welterweight
Posts: 3963
Joined: 24 Jan 2016, 16:19

Re: Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by Mexi-Box »

Since I only have HBO Now (not the full channel), I'll probably be watching Loma-Rigo. Easier to find videos of ESPN than HBO. If I did have the full HBO channel, I'd be watching Salido/Roman. That's likely a FoTY candidate.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by Tanzio »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 05 Dec 2017, 11:22
Tanzio wrote: 05 Dec 2017, 11:20 Both, of course.
You gonna be flipping channels?
Both at once if necessary. Both will be recorded. I will score Rigo v Lomassiah realtime, if they end up happening simultaneously.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101507
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Tanzio wrote: 05 Dec 2017, 12:04
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 05 Dec 2017, 11:22
Tanzio wrote: 05 Dec 2017, 11:20 Both, of course.
You gonna be flipping channels?
Both at once if necessary. Both will be recorded. I will score Rigo v Lomassiah realtime, if they end up happening simultaneously.
Hopefully one finishes before the other. But I doubt it.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46458
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by gilgamesh »

I don't have HBO anymore so Loma vs Rigo it is. Salido vs Roman will almost certainly be the better action fight though.
klitoris
Super Welterweight
Posts: 927
Joined: 29 Sep 2014, 18:16

Re: Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by klitoris »

Obviously Loma-Rigo. Why would any boxing fan in their honest mind pass on a fight with two of the most talented boxers currently in the sport with 4 gold medals to watch a fight with two boxers who have 25 cumulative losses on their records. And on top of that pay a subscription fee in comparison to a free fight on espn lol. Only haters would do that.
squiggy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2094
Joined: 04 Feb 2008, 03:35

Re: Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by squiggy »

klitoris wrote: 05 Dec 2017, 18:01 Obviously Loma-Rigo. Why would any boxing fan in their honest mind pass on a fight with two of the most talented boxers currently in the sport with 4 gold medals to watch a fight with two boxers who have 25 cumulative losses on their records. And on top of that pay a subscription fee in comparison to a free fight on espn lol. Only haters would do that.
Yep, I second all of that. By comparison, Salido and Roman are a couple of schlubs.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by Tanzio »

squiggy wrote: 05 Dec 2017, 18:15
klitoris wrote: 05 Dec 2017, 18:01 Obviously Loma-Rigo. Why would any boxing fan in their honest mind pass on a fight with two of the most talented boxers currently in the sport with 4 gold medals to watch a fight with two boxers who have 25 cumulative losses on their records. And on top of that pay a subscription fee in comparison to a free fight on espn lol. Only haters would do that.
Yep, I second all of that. By comparison, Salido and Roman are a couple of schlubs.
:stop: Including the one who defeated Lomassiah?
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by jamamb »

loma-rigo because if i watch salido-roman ill have no one to talk to about it :lol:
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Both, I'll watch salido live and tape the other one.
squiggy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2094
Joined: 04 Feb 2008, 03:35

Re: Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by squiggy »

Tanzio wrote: 05 Dec 2017, 18:17
squiggy wrote: 05 Dec 2017, 18:15
klitoris wrote: 05 Dec 2017, 18:01 Obviously Loma-Rigo. Why would any boxing fan in their honest mind pass on a fight with two of the most talented boxers currently in the sport with 4 gold medals to watch a fight with two boxers who have 25 cumulative losses on their records. And on top of that pay a subscription fee in comparison to a free fight on espn lol. Only haters would do that.
Yep, I second all of that. By comparison, Salido and Roman are a couple of schlubs.
:stop: Including the one who defeated Lomassiah?
Yes.
squiggy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2094
Joined: 04 Feb 2008, 03:35

Re: Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by squiggy »

But who knows, maybe he'll reward the fans he made that night by blowing off the weight, fighting Roman as dirty as he can, and escaping with a narrow decision.
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by Ricky_ »

klitoris wrote: 05 Dec 2017, 18:01 Obviously Loma-Rigo. Why would any boxing fan in their honest mind pass on a fight with two of the most talented boxers currently in the sport with 4 gold medals to watch a fight with two boxers who have 25 cumulative losses on their records. And on top of that pay a subscription fee in comparison to a free fight on espn lol. Only haters would do that.

This really, i think it may be a musmatch but this fight is certainly in the 'unmissable' category.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by Kalan »

Tanzio wrote: 05 Dec 2017, 18:17
squiggy wrote: 05 Dec 2017, 18:15
klitoris wrote: 05 Dec 2017, 18:01 Obviously Loma-Rigo. Why would any boxing fan in their honest mind pass on a fight with two of the most talented boxers currently in the sport with 4 gold medals to watch a fight with two boxers who have 25 cumulative losses on their records. And on top of that pay a subscription fee in comparison to a free fight on espn lol. Only haters would do that.
Yep, I second all of that. By comparison, Salido and Roman are a couple of schlubs.
:stop: Including the one who defeated Lomassiah?
In your opinion he defeated Lomachenko :shame: :shame: :shame:. Salido would have gotten more money for the rematch than any fight he's fought since.. Lomachenko was WAY up on the broadcast punch stats following the fight -- and Salido was allowed to throw more than 50 low blows by Laurence Cole (who was suspended by the commission for flagrantly biased refereeing).. Also suspicious was Salidio being way overweight at the weigh-in.. Then he gave up his title by never making the slightest effort to make weight.. It was a well planned robbery.. They didn't want an Eastern European with 1 pro fight taking the Featherweight Title, even if Salido couldn't retain it.

I think they had the Lomachenko-Russell fight set up as well if you look at Lisa Giampa's scorecard.. Two of the judges had enough common sense to know "There's no way in Hell we can do this" ... Even Gary Russell said he was surprised by the MD because "He won it."

Unfortunately Russell cannot get a big name Featherweight to fight him.. He's been kicked downstairs.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by Tanzio »

Kalan wrote: 06 Dec 2017, 02:40
Tanzio wrote: 05 Dec 2017, 18:17
squiggy wrote: 05 Dec 2017, 18:15

Yep, I second all of that. By comparison, Salido and Roman are a couple of schlubs.
:stop: Including the one who defeated Lomassiah?
In your opinion he defeated Lomachenko :shame: :shame: :shame:. Salido would have gotten more money for the rematch than any fight he's fought since.. Lomachenko was WAY up on the broadcast punch stats following the fight -- and Salido was allowed to throw more than 50 low blows by Laurence Cole (who was suspended by the commission for flagrantly biased refereeing).. Also suspicious was Salidio being way overweight at the weigh-in.. Then he gave up his title by never making the slightest effort to make weight.. It was a well planned robbery.. They didn't want an Eastern European with 1 pro fight taking the Featherweight Title, even if Salido couldn't retain it.

I think they had the Lomachenko-Russell fight set up as well if you look at Lisa Giampa's scorecard.. Two of the judges had enough common sense to know "There's no way in Hell we can do this" ... Even Gary Russell said he was surprised by the MD because "He won it."

Unfortunately Russell cannot get a big name Featherweight to fight him.. He's been kicked downstairs.
:doh: Holy sh!t!! You are all over the board. Lomassiah chose to go through with the fight. It was close but he lost. There is a distinct possibility that he loses again this weekend.

Salido is a lot of things. Schlub is not one of them. :shame:
squiggy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2094
Joined: 04 Feb 2008, 03:35

Re: Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by squiggy »

Schlub was my word. And I was comparing the two matchups. The talent on display in Loma-Rigo will so much greater than that in Salido-Roman that it's like asking if you're going to watch the World Series or the local minor league game.
I know Salido's had a pretty good career. I marked him the man to beat at feather between the Lopez win and the Garcia loss. But if you check your calendar, that's a 7 at the end of the date, not a 2.
Last edited by squiggy on 06 Dec 2017, 12:32, edited 1 time in total.
Mexi-Box
Welterweight
Posts: 3963
Joined: 24 Jan 2016, 16:19

Re: Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by Mexi-Box »

squiggy wrote: 06 Dec 2017, 12:24 Schlub was my word. And I was comparing the two matchups, not just straight-up calling a dude names. The talent on display in Loma-Rigo will so much greater than that in Salido-Roman that it's like asking if you're going to watch the World Series or the local minor league game.
I know Salido's had a pretty good career. I marked him the man to beat at feather between the Lopez win and the Garcia loss. But if you check your calendar, that's a 7 at the end of the date, not a 2.
Local minor league guy beat the major league guy already then. :bag:

Salido/Roman will be the more exciting fight.
squiggy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2094
Joined: 04 Feb 2008, 03:35

Re: Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by squiggy »

It may well be the more exciting fight, granted. But me and my buddy Joe could have a really exciting back and forth fight while still being way, way less talented than the other people we're talking about.
squiggy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2094
Joined: 04 Feb 2008, 03:35

Re: Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by squiggy »

The "Salido beat him" thing isn't even interesting; you'd have to be currently suffering a pretty bad stroke to think Salido wouldn't lose if they fought again now.
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by SenorPipino »

I'll be watching the Rigo-Loma match, chiefly because of its historical significance (the double gold medal thing each earned) and the fact that they're both considered, by many, top 10 P4P fighters.

It should be entertaining and strategic. Will the stronger Loma bully himself inside and take over. Will Rigo twist and turn, give plenty angles and successfully outbox Loma on the outside?

But Salido-Roman should be a hell of a war. I'm certain I'll watch it eventually. Probably the next day.
Thomastearns
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2402
Joined: 26 Feb 2017, 11:11

Re: Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by Thomastearns »

Four Gold medals between them! This could be beautiful boxing. Rigondeux has age and weight against him but it shouldn't matter too much because he's still lightning quick and economical. This might be the greatest amateur fight taking place in a pro ring. This won't be Hagler v Hearns, more like Benitez v Hearns.

Still great, but in a different way.
lazboy
Welterweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 16 Jun 2016, 21:00

Re: Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by lazboy »

I'll be watching Loma-Rigo and hoping Loma gets Koed although I don't have the balls to bet agaisn't him.
Evander
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 14049
Joined: 07 May 2005, 16:49

Re: Loma-Rigo vs. Salido-Roman: Which are you watching?

Post by Evander »

Lomachenko v Rigondeaux without a shadow of a doubt.
Big fight for the sport I'm really looking forward to it.
Post Reply