Heavyweight rankings: post-Lewis era
Posted: 08 Jan 2018, 16:07
How do you rank heavyweights of the post-Lewis era based on achievements only, not H2H? Post your top-10 please.
I would've had Chris Byrd ranked highly as well under this same critieria. I was going off of the way they had performed since Lewis' retirement.Boxing Writer wrote: ↑08 Jan 2018, 16:34 Mine top-10:
1. Wladimir Klitschko
2. Vitali Klitschko
3. Chris Byrd (I take into account his all resume, although he scored all his best wins when Lewis was still active)
4. Anthony Joshua
5. Tyson Fury
6. Alexander Povetkin
7. Lamon Brewster
8. David Haye
9. Ruslan Chagaev
10. Samuel Peter/Sultan Ibragimov (tie)
I didn't include Sanders, Tua and Rahman because they didn't score any wins over top-10 opponents since June 2003 (Lewis' last fight).
In such a case, my list is:Boxing Writer wrote: ↑08 Jan 2018, 16:34 Mine top-10:
3. Chris Byrd (I take into account his all resume, although he scored all his best wins when Lewis was still active)
It certainly is. Perhaps most disappointing, is how rare these guys have fought each other. Take Wladimir Klitschko out of the equation. I believe Povetkin-Chagaev and V. Klitschko-Peter are the only two fights between the other 9 guys! That is incredible.
While I enjoy and respect almost all of the opinions I come across in this forum, I have to wonder out loud, just what, some plastic and broken promises (both verbal and expected), names such as Chagaev, Haye, Peter, Brewster and Povetkin, have done to eclipse or even surpass Tyson Fury, the man who essentially toppled a very firmly entrenched World heavyweight champion. Further to that end, it allowed sanctioning body tomfoolery, which enabled Anthony Joshua to move forward towards a title shot, via fast track.
Brewster beat younger version of Wlad, demolished Golota, who was better than Chisora, and KO'ed Krasniqui, who was better than Hammer, so I can see some logic here, although I rank Fury ahead of all those guys including Brewster.Ned Merrill wrote: ↑11 Jan 2018, 18:58While I enjoy and respect almost all of the opinions I come across in this forum, I have to wonder out loud, just what, some plastic and broken promises (both verbal and expected), names such as Chagaev, Haye, Peter, Brewster and Povetkin, have done to eclipse or even surpass Tyson Fury, the man who essentially toppled a very firmly entrenched World heavyweight champion. Further to that end, it allowed sanctioning body tomfoolery, which enabled Anthony Joshua to move forward towards a title shot, via fast track.
Granted, Fury has pissed off a lot of people by speaking out firmly against several established narratives, and his Jekyll/Hyde routine does tend to make it hard to love the guy, but I believe it has become sexy to denigrate him and what he accomplished, more so than to credit him. Bias tends to compromise objectivity, especially when there is a sharp tongue involved, in this day and age of being offended.
On another note, I thought Vitali's comeback against Peter was magnificent. It looked almost as though there'd been no extended lay-off and he was rock solid.
Tyson Fury's biggest win is Wladimir Klitschko right? Well Lamon Brewster knocked out a better Wladimir Klitschko than the one Tyson Fury fought. Aside from that he defended his title 3 or 4 times, and has a solid KO 1 win over Andrew Golota which is better than anything Fury has done.Ned Merrill wrote: ↑11 Jan 2018, 18:58While I enjoy and respect almost all of the opinions I come across in this forum, I have to wonder out loud, just what, some plastic and broken promises (both verbal and expected), names such as Chagaev, Haye, Peter, Brewster and Povetkin, have done to eclipse or even surpass Tyson Fury, the man who essentially toppled a very firmly entrenched World heavyweight champion. Further to that end, it allowed sanctioning body tomfoolery, which enabled Anthony Joshua to move forward towards a title shot, via fast track.
Granted, Fury has pissed off a lot of people by speaking out firmly against several established narratives, and his Jekyll/Hyde routine does tend to make it hard to love the guy, but I believe it has become sexy to denigrate him and what he accomplished, more so than to credit him. Bias tends to compromise objectivity, especially when there is a sharp tongue involved, in this day and age of being offended.
On another note, I thought Vitali's comeback against Peter was magnificent. It looked almost as though there'd been no extended lay-off and he was rock solid.
From that angle you can't see the execution of the thumbstrike...golden oldie wrote: ↑11 Jan 2018, 17:16
Try watching 2.54 of this clip which DOESN'T suit your perverted agenda. Not only can you see the CLEAN punch that opens Vitali's eyelid, you can hear it land
Sanders can be ranked in the top 10 off one spectacular win over an admittedly very flawed (at the time) Heavyweight, who also lost to other less than stellar Heavyweights, before he teamed with Steward....HomicideHenry wrote: ↑12 Jan 2018, 18:47 Since Lennox Lewis?
1. Wladimir Klitschko
2. Vitali Klitschko
3. Tyson Fury
4. Corrie Sanders
5. Deontay Wilder
Honorable mention: David Haye
Sanders I have in there based off his performances against both Klitschko brothers. He arguably gave Vitali the toughest fight of his life, which is pretty good considering most people couldn't do crap against Vitali. Throw in Sanders being a good sized, good powered, good hand speed, fast starting southpaw... That plays hell on most anybody... His problem, though, was mentality. He preferred golfing over boxing. But when he was determined, it took special people to put him away.Kalan wrote: ↑12 Jan 2018, 19:48Sanders can be ranked in the top 10 off one spectacular win over an admittedly very flawed (at the time) Heavyweight, who also lost to other less than stellar Heavyweights, before he teamed with Steward....HomicideHenry wrote: ↑12 Jan 2018, 18:47 Since Lennox Lewis?
1. Wladimir Klitschko
2. Vitali Klitschko
3. Tyson Fury
4. Corrie Sanders
5. Deontay Wilder
Honorable mention: David Haye
But how many losses did Sanders have? .... Who did he beat post Lewis? .... And how many Title Fights did he ever win???
Same with Fury.... He fails to stop an aging Wladimir Klitschko... Then he FO's for 3 years....and he's number 3???![]()
While I respect your points, I do-not-believe Brewster stopped "a better Wladimir Klitschko". I believe he stopped a younger Klitschko, but as a long reigning heavyweight champion who had dominated the division for almost a decade, I believe Fury check-mated a Klitschko with far superior experience and stern, much-improved self belief.gilgamesh wrote: ↑11 Jan 2018, 20:32Tyson Fury's biggest win is Wladimir Klitschko right? Well Lamon Brewster knocked out a better Wladimir Klitschko than the one Tyson Fury fought. Aside from that he defended his title 3 or 4 times, and has a solid KO 1 win over Andrew Golota which is better than anything Fury has done.Ned Merrill wrote: ↑11 Jan 2018, 18:58While I enjoy and respect almost all of the opinions I come across in this forum, I have to wonder out loud, just what, some plastic and broken promises (both verbal and expected), names such as Chagaev, Haye, Peter, Brewster and Povetkin, have done to eclipse or even surpass Tyson Fury, the man who essentially toppled a very firmly entrenched World heavyweight champion. Further to that end, it allowed sanctioning body tomfoolery, which enabled Anthony Joshua to move forward towards a title shot, via fast track.
Granted, Fury has pissed off a lot of people by speaking out firmly against several established narratives, and his Jekyll/Hyde routine does tend to make it hard to love the guy, but I believe it has become sexy to denigrate him and what he accomplished, more so than to credit him. Bias tends to compromise objectivity, especially when there is a sharp tongue involved, in this day and age of being offended.
On another note, I thought Vitali's comeback against Peter was magnificent. It looked almost as though there'd been no extended lay-off and he was rock solid.
Ruslan Chagaev beat Nicolay Valuev convincingly, and has a solid record, but if you wanted to flip him around with Brewster on my list I wouldn't argue with you.
They both did more than Fury has done. Fury is still young, and can still add to his legacy. As of this moment, he ain't got much of one.
Solid points you've made. Like you I too rank Fury ahead of all those guys. Not simply because of the stats, but because of the mountain that he climbed, so to speak, in dethroning a long-reigning, very dominant heavyweight star.Boxing Writer wrote: ↑11 Jan 2018, 19:11Brewster beat younger version of Wlad, demolished Golota, who was better than Chisora, and KO'ed Krasniqui, who was better than Hammer, so I can see some logic here, although I rank Fury ahead of all those guys including Brewster.Ned Merrill wrote: ↑11 Jan 2018, 18:58While I enjoy and respect almost all of the opinions I come across in this forum, I have to wonder out loud, just what, some plastic and broken promises (both verbal and expected), names such as Chagaev, Haye, Peter, Brewster and Povetkin, have done to eclipse or even surpass Tyson Fury, the man who essentially toppled a very firmly entrenched World heavyweight champion. Further to that end, it allowed sanctioning body tomfoolery, which enabled Anthony Joshua to move forward towards a title shot, via fast track.
Granted, Fury has pissed off a lot of people by speaking out firmly against several established narratives, and his Jekyll/Hyde routine does tend to make it hard to love the guy, but I believe it has become sexy to denigrate him and what he accomplished, more so than to credit him. Bias tends to compromise objectivity, especially when there is a sharp tongue involved, in this day and age of being offended.
On another note, I thought Vitali's comeback against Peter was magnificent. It looked almost as though there'd been no extended lay-off and he was rock solid.
The Klitschko that fought Brewster was aggressive, attacking and did more damage to Brewster in 1 round than he did to Fury in 12. He didn't even fight against Fury, he just looked at him for 12 rounds.Ned Merrill wrote: ↑14 Jan 2018, 10:07While I respect your points, I do-not-believe Brewster stopped "a better Wladimir Klitschko". I believe he stopped a younger Klitschko, but as a long reigning heavyweight champion who had dominated the division for almost a decade, I believe Fury check-mated a Klitschko with far superior experience and stern, much-improved self belief.gilgamesh wrote: ↑11 Jan 2018, 20:32Tyson Fury's biggest win is Wladimir Klitschko right? Well Lamon Brewster knocked out a better Wladimir Klitschko than the one Tyson Fury fought. Aside from that he defended his title 3 or 4 times, and has a solid KO 1 win over Andrew Golota which is better than anything Fury has done.Ned Merrill wrote: ↑11 Jan 2018, 18:58
While I enjoy and respect almost all of the opinions I come across in this forum, I have to wonder out loud, just what, some plastic and broken promises (both verbal and expected), names such as Chagaev, Haye, Peter, Brewster and Povetkin, have done to eclipse or even surpass Tyson Fury, the man who essentially toppled a very firmly entrenched World heavyweight champion. Further to that end, it allowed sanctioning body tomfoolery, which enabled Anthony Joshua to move forward towards a title shot, via fast track.
Granted, Fury has pissed off a lot of people by speaking out firmly against several established narratives, and his Jekyll/Hyde routine does tend to make it hard to love the guy, but I believe it has become sexy to denigrate him and what he accomplished, more so than to credit him. Bias tends to compromise objectivity, especially when there is a sharp tongue involved, in this day and age of being offended.
On another note, I thought Vitali's comeback against Peter was magnificent. It looked almost as though there'd been no extended lay-off and he was rock solid.
Ruslan Chagaev beat Nicolay Valuev convincingly, and has a solid record, but if you wanted to flip him around with Brewster on my list I wouldn't argue with you.
They both did more than Fury has done. Fury is still young, and can still add to his legacy. As of this moment, he ain't got much of one.
Because Fury reduced Wlad to fistic impotence.gilgamesh wrote: ↑14 Jan 2018, 12:39The Klitschko that fought Brewster was aggressive, attacking and did more damage to Brewster in 1 round than he did to Fury in 12. He didn't even fight against Fury, he just looked at him for 12 rounds.Ned Merrill wrote: ↑14 Jan 2018, 10:07While I respect your points, I do-not-believe Brewster stopped "a better Wladimir Klitschko". I believe he stopped a younger Klitschko, but as a long reigning heavyweight champion who had dominated the division for almost a decade, I believe Fury check-mated a Klitschko with far superior experience and stern, much-improved self belief.gilgamesh wrote: ↑11 Jan 2018, 20:32
Tyson Fury's biggest win is Wladimir Klitschko right? Well Lamon Brewster knocked out a better Wladimir Klitschko than the one Tyson Fury fought. Aside from that he defended his title 3 or 4 times, and has a solid KO 1 win over Andrew Golota which is better than anything Fury has done.
Ruslan Chagaev beat Nicolay Valuev convincingly, and has a solid record, but if you wanted to flip him around with Brewster on my list I wouldn't argue with you.
They both did more than Fury has done. Fury is still young, and can still add to his legacy. As of this moment, he ain't got much of one.
Fury did nothing, but be in the ring the night that Wladimir decided staring was the way to defend the title. I wasn't impressed by Fury's performance in that fight, nor will I ever be.Ned Merrill wrote: ↑14 Jan 2018, 20:48Because Fury reduced Wlad to fistic impotence.gilgamesh wrote: ↑14 Jan 2018, 12:39The Klitschko that fought Brewster was aggressive, attacking and did more damage to Brewster in 1 round than he did to Fury in 12. He didn't even fight against Fury, he just looked at him for 12 rounds.Ned Merrill wrote: ↑14 Jan 2018, 10:07
While I respect your points, I do-not-believe Brewster stopped "a better Wladimir Klitschko". I believe he stopped a younger Klitschko, but as a long reigning heavyweight champion who had dominated the division for almost a decade, I believe Fury check-mated a Klitschko with far superior experience and stern, much-improved self belief.![]()
Fury isn't a good athlete... He's got "big and tall man syndrome" where 999 out of 1000 guys 6'9" and taller appear slow and ungainly vs an outstanding athlete who's 6' to 6'6" ... It's the elephant vs the ant analysis ... If, for their size, elephants could move with the speed, maneuverability, and agility of ants we'd all be in trouble if we went on a safari... In a flash 16 elephants would run off with the entire caravan, stuff you into a cave, and zoom out looking for a herd of baboons to snatch – or anybody else who’s a rival for vegetation... It's nature's way of evening things up a bit.gilgamesh wrote: ↑15 Jan 2018, 09:57Fury did nothing, but be in the ring the night that Wladimir decided staring was the way to defend the title. I wasn't impressed by Fury's performance in that fight, nor will I ever be