Manuel Charr (c) vs. Fres Oquendo - September 29th 2018
Posted: 09 Feb 2018, 14:10
who wins?
You're not familiar with this? The WBA owes him one because of a court case thing. It's just taken like 3 and a half years and running now to actually happen.
Now it's a title defense for Charr? When did he ever win a title? Did they literally just hand him one?
Agreed, but we are posting aren't we! Charr will win easily IMHO. BTW Epic...Charr is in fact World Boxing Association Heavyweight Title, Joshua is Super HW titlist, so there! (pathetic)
Nah I think Joshua is just the "Super" Champion right. Which means he's the championoogiebe wrote: ↑06 Apr 2018, 18:26Agreed, but we are posting aren't we! Charr will win easily IMHO. BTW Epic...Charr is in fact World Boxing Association Heavyweight Title, Joshua is Super HW titlist, so there! (pathetic)
so it will be exciting as watching leaves fall from trees in the summer. zzzzzzZZZZZZ![]()
So Wilder is the Super Dooper Champion? Who's the Grand High Exalted Poobah champion...! I just can't stand it.gilgamesh wrote: ↑06 Apr 2018, 18:46Nah I think Joshua is just the "Super" Champion right. Which means he's the championoogiebe wrote: ↑06 Apr 2018, 18:26Agreed, but we are posting aren't we! Charr will win easily IMHO. BTW Epic...Charr is in fact World Boxing Association Heavyweight Title, Joshua is Super HW titlist, so there! (pathetic)
so it will be exciting as watching leaves fall from trees in the summer. zzzzzzZZZZZZ![]()
![]()
Nah Wilder just has a different belt. He's the WBC Champion. He's got a different belt than any of the ones that AJ hasoogiebe wrote: ↑06 Apr 2018, 18:51So Wilder is the Super Dooper Champion? Who's the Grand High Exalted Poobah champion...! I just can't stand it.gilgamesh wrote: ↑06 Apr 2018, 18:46Nah I think Joshua is just the "Super" Champion right. Which means he's the championoogiebe wrote: ↑06 Apr 2018, 18:26
Agreed, but we are posting aren't we! Charr will win easily IMHO. BTW Epic...Charr is in fact World Boxing Association Heavyweight Title, Joshua is Super HW titlist, so there! (pathetic)
so it will be exciting as watching leaves fall from trees in the summer. zzzzzzZZZZZZ![]()
![]()
We could and should but we need a source to look to. It used to be Ring Magazine, I don't know who or what it is today. I guess it's me!!!gilgamesh wrote: ↑06 Apr 2018, 19:00 I really hate it that shortly after I became a Boxing fan the WBO gained prominence as a meaningful World Title. It already sucked bad enough when there were 3 sanctioning bodies then they had to go on and throw a 4th one in there![]()
It's basically gotten to a point where you should just ignore the belts. Whoever the #1 guy is that's the man to beat. Belt or no belt.
This is the best example of an accurate, and objective Rankings with credibility that you'll find I thinkoogiebe wrote: ↑06 Apr 2018, 19:03We could and should but we need a source to look to. It used to be Ring Magazine, I don't know who or what it is today. I guess it's me!!!gilgamesh wrote: ↑06 Apr 2018, 19:00 I really hate it that shortly after I became a Boxing fan the WBO gained prominence as a meaningful World Title. It already sucked bad enough when there were 3 sanctioning bodies then they had to go on and throw a 4th one in there![]()
It's basically gotten to a point where you should just ignore the belts. Whoever the #1 guy is that's the man to beat. Belt or no belt.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I'm with you. I briefly went over to that site and I liked it. Glad to see 'last week' column in ratings. Unfortunately we're not going to 'lose' any BS sanctioning bodies anytime soon.gilgamesh wrote: ↑06 Apr 2018, 19:23This is the best example of an accurate, and objective Rankings with credibility that you'll find I thinkoogiebe wrote: ↑06 Apr 2018, 19:03We could and should but we need a source to look to. It used to be Ring Magazine, I don't know who or what it is today. I guess it's me!!!gilgamesh wrote: ↑06 Apr 2018, 19:00 I really hate it that shortly after I became a Boxing fan the WBO gained prominence as a meaningful World Title. It already sucked bad enough when there were 3 sanctioning bodies then they had to go on and throw a 4th one in there![]()
It's basically gotten to a point where you should just ignore the belts. Whoever the #1 guy is that's the man to beat. Belt or no belt.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
http://www.tbrb.org/
I like to think we do a pretty good job over at TTR too. I keep rankings for all the weight classes personally, and try my best to keep up with all the significant happenings in the sport. Some of my biggest wishes for the sport is that we could lose 3 of the title orgs, and 7 of the weight classes![]()
Wishful thinking I know![]()
HAHAHAHA!!! (I knew Gilgamesh's last post would invite this). I was going to scan through and comment, but I abstained. The ratings are better than most and as good as anyone's.jamamb wrote: ↑06 Apr 2018, 19:36 why is transnational any better then the ring in terms of the actual rankings
for example by what measure can anyone think nate gallimore is already the #5 in the world at 154? and he was as high as #4 before.
its pretty sad if a so called group of 50 experts actually agreed on that
AND...they have Teddy, so there you have it.oogiebe wrote: ↑06 Apr 2018, 19:38HAHAHAHA!!! (I knew Gilgamesh's last post would invite this). I was going to scan through and comment, but I abstained. The ratings are better than most and as good as anyone's.jamamb wrote: ↑06 Apr 2018, 19:36 why is transnational any better then the ring in terms of the actual rankings
for example by what measure can anyone think nate gallimore is already the #5 in the world at 154? and he was as high as #4 before.
its pretty sad if a so called group of 50 experts actually agreed on that