The prestige of the RING Magazine

Post Reply
ElJefe
Middleweight
Posts: 2545
Joined: 22 Apr 2014, 13:13

The prestige of the RING Magazine

Post by ElJefe »

Came across a tweet yesterday that screenshotted an extract from one of Mike Coppinger's articles on the Ring Magazine's website...

https://www.ringtv.com/528284-deontay-w ... fy-titles/

"The great Rocky Marciano reached 49-0 and then retired. If Wilder can indeed reach his lofty goal, he won’t just be undisputed. He’ll be legendary."

Initially I thought about how bizarre a statement it was from that individual. Afterwards, though, it made me think about the Ring Magazine as a whole.

It's the most famous boxing publication in the world, they have their own lineal title and the p4p list. But how do you regard the magazine today? How prestigious is it in 2018? How does that compare with years gone by? If there has been a change in the prestige of the Ring, when and why did this occur?
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: The prestige of the RING Magazine

Post by jamamb »

coppinger is awful and hugely biased to americans

coppinger, rosenthal, and most of the regular ring writers are nothing special at all
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: The prestige of the RING Magazine

Post by leejonesjnr »

Not all that long ago The Ring title was held in very high regard. Bernard Hopkins v Joe Calzaghe was billed as a World Title fight with only The Ring title at stake and nobody had any issue with that at all.
The Ring Championship is barely even mentioned these days. Apart from the recent Tyson Fury issue, I can’t actually recall another time recently that it’s been mentioned.
The magazine and how essential it is seem to have gone the same way. Once upon a time it would be in every newsagents and I would never miss a copy. Now it’s difficult to find and I can’t recall the last time I bought a copy. Print publications are struggling generally but specialist magazines usually survive. In the U.K. at least I’m not sure The Ring will.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: The prestige of the RING Magazine

Post by jamamb »

yep its pretty much just mentioned here and there with fury, or at least was as he and his fans tried to grasp onto some legitimacy as still being the real man at hw despite not fighting since 2015 and going off the rails

honestly i think most ppl stopped caring. it had a 'hot' phase a few years back but thats well over
littlepug
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5351
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 07:17

Re: The prestige of the RING Magazine

Post by littlepug »

Lost its shine when Oscar bought it
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 47034
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: The prestige of the RING Magazine

Post by gilgamesh »

littlepug wrote: 10 Feb 2018, 16:45 Lost its shine when Oscar bought it
Yep. A publication simply cannot be viewed as genuinely objective when its' owner is one of the sports key promoters, and would have a financial interest in the rankings.

Just too much conflict of interest there.
milpool
Cruiserweight
Posts: 5402
Joined: 18 May 2011, 13:38

Re: The prestige of the RING Magazine

Post by milpool »

Used to buy it every month but eventually got tired of it being about three months out of date. Pre the internet it didn't matter so much but with information so easily available, reading old news becomes a bit pointless.
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26460
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: The prestige of the RING Magazine

Post by banjo »

littlepug wrote: 10 Feb 2018, 16:45 Lost its shine when Oscar bought it
Completely agree I got it all the time until then, then it was just every so often as the quality was getting worse, must be 10 years now since I bought The Ring.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12047
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: The prestige of the RING Magazine

Post by Taansend »

milpool wrote: 10 Feb 2018, 17:01 Used to buy it every month but eventually got tired of it being about three months out of date. Pre the internet it didn't matter so much but with information so easily available, reading old news becomes a bit pointless.
This.

The Age of Print has lost its importance nowadays.

Also, Rocky's 49-0 record is a load of bollocks, in my humble opinion :D

Yes he did win 49 professional fights but after his debut his trainer took him back to the amateurs (where he won some & lost some) so he didn't win 49 consecutive fights.

So technically his record is 49-0 but it's tainted for Mr Taansend :OhYes:
tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Re: The prestige of the RING Magazine

Post by tobyh5 »

I do not even use the website anymore. It is boring drivel and clear agendas and I am starting to dislike that FIsher guy (and his associates) who brings personality and personal likes and dislikes in too much. He talks shite, him and Kim are utter cockwombles and that Montera dude does not seem to understand this sport one little bit. A cliché of cnuts
Post Reply