James Hare attempts to clarify the situation

Post Reply
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

James Hare attempts to clarify the situation

Post by DavidPayne »

Spoke to James on Friday and Monday.

Here's some of what he said.

http://www.thesweetscience.com/boxing-a ... clash-not/
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45229
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Good interview Dave, developing quite a flair for that area I note.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Post by DavidPayne »

I thought it was a bit under-developed myself, but thanks for the comments. However, I wanted to seize the moment before someone else got the ahead of me.

But speaking to James and Chris is very easy - typically easy-going-straight-talking Yorkshiremen.

Good guys.

I'm continuing to see if the story has any other twists too.

Look out for two more interviews in the next couple of weeks.
nickd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45

Post by nickd »

Good interview!

Another case of Sports Network announcing a fight then pulling it later once people have bought their tickets - somebody really should do something about that. I have no doubt that was SN's plan all along - to have the Barnes v Hare fight as a bill topper but meantime boost ticket sales for October 1st. Its a joke.
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Post by bennie »

Barnes-Hare always seemed too good to be true.
nickd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45

Post by nickd »

Indeed.

I was thinking the other day of turning pro and calling myself 'TBA', plenty of work out there I hear.
lirva33
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by lirva33 »

007 wrote:Indeed.

I was thinking the other day of turning pro and calling myself 'TBA', plenty of work out there I hear.

:lol:
Post Reply