What happened to Langford's Boxrec rating?

Post Reply
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

What happened to Langford's Boxrec rating?

Post by BitPlayer »

Went from top 10 at heavyweight to 28, below the likes of Tommy Burns, and James Toney.
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: What happened to Langford's Boxrec rating?

Post by HomicideHenry »

BitPlayer wrote: 01 May 2018, 06:22 Went from top 10 at heavyweight to 28, below the likes of Tommy Burns, and James Toney.
The algorithm for BoxRec, combined with public opinion swaying the system, makes the "whole picture" askewed. It's a major issue with this site.
wouter
Editor
Editor
Posts: 4802
Joined: 04 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: What happened to Langford's Boxrec rating?

Post by wouter »

Don't take the alltime ratings too seriously :TU:
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: What happened to Langford's Boxrec rating?

Post by BitPlayer »

wouter wrote: 01 May 2018, 13:16 Don't take the alltime ratings too seriously :TU:
I'm just interested because it's the most I've seen someone's rating slashed, while I didn't notice much other change either.
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: What happened to Langford's Boxrec rating?

Post by BitPlayer »

Actually Greb's rating crashed too.
Post Reply