Selby-Warrington matchmaking score

[ashedward]

Hi this is for any of the CHB guys who haven't been banned and any boxrec people who are interested

Selby-Warrington 8/10
Tetley-cartwright 3/5
Catterell-Sabire 1/5
Adams-Valles Frias 2/5

14/25

Quality main event with pretty poor undercard imo.

[Horse]

Rob?

[ashedward]

Nope,ashedward who took charge of the matchmaking thread this year and have been in the forums for years.

[Horse]

Nope,ashedward who took charge of the matchmaking thread this year and have been in the forums for years.

No, I was only being silly.

I meant no offence.

[ashedward]

That's alright mate,it's just if people thought I was Rob on here I would be banned as soon as I could blink and I need somewhere to talk about boxing with CHB in limbo.

[ashedward]

Selby-Warrington 8/10

Good fight,bit dirty and ref was too leaniant but Warrington surprised me

[digzee]

Selby-Warrington 8/10

Good fight,bit dirty and ref was too leaniant but Warrington surprised me

Do you think Tawetrent is screaming robbery?

[ashedward]

Selby-Warrington 8/10

Good fight,bit dirty and ref was too leaniant but Warrington surprised me

Do you think Tawetrent is screaming robbery?

Yeah I expect so and he can use that judge as evidence that it was close ha

[Horse]

Selby-Warrington 8/10
Tetley-cartwright 2/5
Catterell-Sabire 1/5
Adams-Valles Frias 2/5

13/25

[digzee]

Selby-Warrington 8/10

Good fight,bit dirty and ref was too leaniant but Warrington surprised me

Do you think Tawetrent is screaming robbery?

Yeah I expect so and he can use that judge as evidence that it was close ha

Shit i didnt think about that haha.

You not gonna give a rating to the Kaiser chiefs? I didn't see the undercard but by the look of your score they could've been the highlight!

[ashedward]

Selby-Warrington 8/10
Tetley-cartwright 2/5
Catterell-Sabire 1/5
Adams-Valles Frias 2/5

13/25

Missed the undercard so will have to catch up but was Tetley-Cartwright decent ?

[ashedward]

Do you think Tawetrent is screaming robbery?

Yeah I expect so and he can use that judge as evidence that it was close ha

poo i didnt think about that haha.

You not gonna give a rating to the Kaiser chiefs? I didn't see the undercard but by the look of your score they could've been the highlight!

The Kasier Chiefs probably a 2/5 for me.The scores in my op are the pre fight scores haven't seen the undercard yet but heard Tetley-Cartwright was decent.

[Horse]

Missed the undercard so will have to catch up but was Tetley-Cartwright decent ?

I missed it as well, but I think it is meant to be good.

[broomy7s]

Tetley vs cartwright was quality matchmaking. More of that please, 2 un beaten lads against each other.

[Andrew]

I'm aware of your threads on checkhook.

Personally Catterall should be a zero last minute opponent. Catterrall gave up the British title and avoided Glenn Foot ( a guy he would probably beat) for that.

Embarassing

[ashedward]

I'm aware of your threads on checkhook.

Personally Catterall should be a zero last minute opponent. Catterrall gave up the British title and avoided Glenn Foot ( a guy he would probably beat) for that.

Embarassing

Fair point,undecard was poor but wazza got away with it as the main event was decent.If the finished with a cut early it would of been a washout.

[jamamb]

why the 2s and 3s on tet vs cart? two unbeaten young guys. turned out to be very evenly matched and good fght. just ddnt have the name value or not at good enough level for a higher rating?

[Horse]

why the 2s and 3s on tet vs cart? two unbeaten young guys. turned out to be very evenly matched and good fght. just ddnt have the name value or not at good enough level for a higher rating?

Yes, they were too lowly ranked for a higher score.

[ashedward]

why the 2s and 3s on tet vs cart? two unbeaten young guys. turned out to be very evenly matched and good fght. just ddnt have the name value or not at good enough level for a higher rating?

Hi mate I do pre and post fight scores,pre fight it's a 3 as it's a good domestic fight but not quite worth a 4 but the post fight score might be higher if the fight is as good as people are saying when I catch up with it later.

[Yes We Can]

I enjoy your ratings on chb. Haven't watched the card yet this time.

[Horse]

Hi mate I do pre and post fight scores,pre fight it's a 3 as it's a good domestic fight but not quite worth a 4 but the post fight score might be higher if the fight is as good as people are saying when I catch up with it later.

No way it should even be a three and especially not a four.

They were both ranked about 15th in Britain. It doesn't matter if it's evenly matched, the level is far too low.

[ashedward]

Hi mate I do pre and post fight scores,pre fight it's a 3 as it's a good domestic fight but not quite worth a 4 but the post fight score might be higher if the fight is as good as people are saying when I catch up with it later.

No way it should even be a three and especially not a four.

They were both ranked about 15th in Britain. It doesn't matter if it's evenly matched, the level is far too low.

I think we can agree to disagree on this one,evenly matched fights even at area level is better then names in horrendous mismatches that we get sometimes but I respect your view and the way you would score it.

[ashedward]

Warrington-Selby 8/10 8/10
Cartwright-Tetly 3/5 3/5
Adams-Valles Frias 2/5 1/5
Catterll- sabire 1/5 1/5
27/50

Yep shit undercard fight hurt the score badly imo.