The top level boxers never had been helped by the judges/referees (since 2000)

[ValMar]

What do you think ?

[oogiebe]

Marvin Haggler. Draw with Antoufermo and loss to SRL both hard to swallow.

[ezhmael]

You should go with Rigo and Loma on this. Both wins convincingly. You can include the Joshua since KO'ed most of his opponents and the Russian guy that participated in the WBSS I think his name was Kurdryashov.

[tiny_acres]

You should go with Rigo and Loma on this. Both wins convincingly. You can include the Joshua since KO'ed most of his opponents and the Russian guy that participated in the WBSS I think his name was Kurdryashov.

Joshua was helped tremendously by the ref in the Parker fight. Parker was not allowed to get on the inside with out being warned. Not that he had a chance but it would of been nice to let him have a chance

[jamamb]

joshuas better inside then parker, his uppercuts the best at hw, i think the ref just sucked. but aj has defo had some generous judging

[oogiebe]

joshua better inside then parker, his uppercuts the best at hw

Yup, just ask Whyte and Wlad.

[tiny_acres]

joshuas better inside then parker, his uppercuts the best at hw, i think the ref just sucked. but aj has defo had some generous judging

And some premature stoppages.

[jamamb]

takam was the one early one unless im forgetting

[oogiebe]

joshuas better inside then parker, his uppercuts the best at hw, i think the ref just sucked. but aj has defo had some generous judging

And some premature stoppages.

Just saying, the post refers to NEVER had been helped... LOL!

[tiny_acres]

joshuas better inside then parker, his uppercuts the best at hw, i think the ref just sucked. but aj has defo had some generous judging

And some premature stoppages.

Just saying, the post refers to NEVER had been helped... LOL!

Ezahmel claimed Joshua has never been helped. Just pointing out the flaw in his opinion

[oogiebe]

And some premature stoppages.

Just saying, the post refers to NEVER had been helped... LOL!

Ezahmel claimed Joshua has never been helped. Just pointing out the flaw in his opinion

Ah! Got it!

[ValMar]

Joshua - doubtful stoppage against Takam. Anyway, Joshua would have been the winner. Terrible scorecards (before the KO) against Povetkin. Again, Joshua would have been the winner.
I might be wrong, but I can not remember that judges/referees ever had helped Klitschko brothers.

[tiny_acres]

Joshua - doubtful stoppage against Takam. Anyway, Joshua would have been the winner. Terrible scorecards (before the KO) against Povetkin. Again, Joshua would have been the winner.
I might be wrong, but I can not remember that judges/referees ever had helped Klitschko brothers.

I would argue about ref not helping Wlad. His constant clinching or as I can his style Klitching.
He should of been warned way more times and been deducted way more points. I honestly thought he deserved to be dq'd against Povetkin. That was the worst case on over clinching

[ValMar]

Joshua - doubtful stoppage against Takam. Anyway, Joshua would have been the winner. Terrible scorecards (before the KO) against Povetkin. Again, Joshua would have been the winner.
I might be wrong, but I can not remember that judges/referees ever had helped Klitschko brothers.

I would argue about ref not helping Wlad. His constant clinching or as I can his style Klitching.
He should of been warned way more times and been deducted way more points. I honestly thought he deserved to be dq'd against Povetkin. That was the worst case on over clinching

I am not sure Wlad should have been dq'd against Povetkin, but he should have been deducted a point (or two) definitely.
Border-line case, but Wlad would have been victorious, absolutely. Povetkin didn't do anything to deserve victory.

[tiny_acres]

Joshua - doubtful stoppage against Takam. Anyway, Joshua would have been the winner. Terrible scorecards (before the KO) against Povetkin. Again, Joshua would have been the winner.
I might be wrong, but I can not remember that judges/referees ever had helped Klitschko brothers.

I would argue about ref not helping Wlad. His constant clinching or as I can his style Klitching.
He should of been warned way more times and been deducted way more points. I honestly thought he deserved to be dq'd against Povetkin. That was the worst case on over clinching

I am not sure Wlad should have been dq'd against Povetkin, but he should have been deducted a point (or two) definitely.
Border-line case, but Wlad would have been victorious, absolutely. Povetkin didn't do anything to deserve victory.

No doubt Wlad would of still won. Just terrible bias ref in that fight

[dagilechia]

Juan Manuel Marquez

[Onetimeonly]

Officiating has always been poor. What are you even trying to say?

[skanksta]

JMM x2

Gentlemen Glenn "The Road Warrior" Johnson

Anyone who fought Sven Ottke

[Ruthless-RKO]

Marvin Haggler. Draw with Antoufermo and loss to SRL both hard to swallow.

Since 2000?

[Ruthless-RKO]

takam was the one early one unless im forgetting

That would have easily gone to the scorecards. But they had to keep his 100% KO streak alive before the Parker fight.

[oogiebe]

Marvin Haggler. Draw with Antoufermo and loss to SRL both hard to swallow.

Since 2000?

I should read closer, along with a great many other posters on this thread!

[greg]

What do you think ?

[Cent0089]

JMM x2

Gentlemen Glenn "The Road Warrior" Johnson

Anyone who fought Sven Ottke

One judge give Johnson a draw against Carl Froch