The California "Knockout" Rule

Post Reply
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46345
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

The California "Knockout" Rule

Post by gilgamesh »

Can I just say how f*cking stupid this is. Any stoppage be it a stoppage on the feet or a corner stoppage or a Doctor stoppage is a Knockout and recorded as a knockout? All knockouts are just recorded the same regardless of method? Just stupid, and needlessly confusing when nobody else does it that way. I hope they cut this BS soon.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: The California "Knockout" Rule

Post by jamamb »

a guy doesnt have to be ktfo for a 10 count for it to be ruled a ko

seems to be a common misconception that a ko means only that you were counted out or out cold, when was that made fact?
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46345
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: The California "Knockout" Rule

Post by gilgamesh »

A TKO or Doctor/Corner stoppage still goes on the record as a KO, but it's usually noted as a TKO or whatever the case may be on record. California making the ruling that all KO's are simply ruled KO no matter the method they occurred is just dumb that's all I'm saying.

There's lots of variables in Boxing, and it makes things unclear when only 1 state rules things that way, but nowhere else does.
armageto
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5260
Joined: 04 Nov 2004, 20:15

Re: The California "Knockout" Rule

Post by armageto »

Getting sparked out for 10 and let's say breaking your arm and not being able to continue are massively different to me, and should hopefully be noted by a commission as such.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101199
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: The California "Knockout" Rule

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Hasn't this always been the case with the CSAC?

Rather strange. I prefer to se TKO's and RTD's.

Maybe it's their way to simplify.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: The California "Knockout" Rule

Post by oogiebe »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 11 May 2019, 11:23 Hasn't this always been the case with the CSAC?

Rather strange. I prefer to se TKO's and RTD's.

Maybe it's their way to simplify.
It's California. They want to be 'fair' and not distinguish as to not hurt someone's feelings. :lol:
Ilya Muromets
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4243
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02

Re: The California "Knockout" Rule

Post by Ilya Muromets »

oogiebe wrote: 11 May 2019, 11:25 It's California. They want to be 'fair' and not distinguish as to not hurt someone's feelings. :lol:



:OhYes:
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: The California "Knockout" Rule

Post by dagilechia »

boxing rules should be universal around the world.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: The California "Knockout" Rule

Post by oogiebe »

dagilechia wrote: 11 May 2019, 12:49 boxing rules should be universal around the world.
Amen brother!
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: The California "Knockout" Rule

Post by dagilechia »

I didn't noticed any differences in rules in European countries, i believe that Russia, UK, Germany, Poland, Spain, Denmark etc all have the same rules, and i think Asian countries like Japan have just the same rules as European countries. it's only the US States that have the differences between them while the rest of the world uses universal rules.
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: The California "Knockout" Rule

Post by SenorPipino »

dagilechia wrote: 11 May 2019, 12:49 boxing rules should be universal around the world.
And maybe there should on be just one universal governing body too.

Neither is going to happen.
Post Reply