Page 1 of 1
How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
Posted: 06 Sep 2019, 12:02
by MasterG
..who beat Mike Tyson
Discuss
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
Posted: 06 Sep 2019, 12:08
by gilgamesh
He would've barely been Top 10 in the world at that time. Every other active Heavyweight who was somebody at that time would've likely beaten him. He was briefly ranked off beating shot Mike though, but that was a very brief run.
Brewster, Byrd, Ruiz, The Klitschko's (Vitali did beat him), Sam Peter, Toney....I don't really see Danny beating any of those guys.
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
Posted: 06 Sep 2019, 15:47
by chrisjs1985
Crap, in a word.
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
Posted: 06 Sep 2019, 16:34
by Noxy
He was great. Not really a world class guy though, as pointed out already. Had some top domestic scraps.
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
Posted: 06 Sep 2019, 19:11
by Controversial
He had decent ability but seemed to lack confidence in himself, an underachiever. I stood next to him once and I was surprised just how big he was, he’s a massive lump.
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
Posted: 06 Sep 2019, 22:31
by writehooks
I'm not sure he was ever even good enough to beat the Danny Williams on the original Hawaii Five-0.
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
Posted: 07 Sep 2019, 06:05
by DrDuke
gilgamesh wrote: ↑06 Sep 2019, 12:08
He would've barely been Top 10 in the world at that time. Every other active Heavyweight who was somebody at that time would've likely beaten him. He was briefly ranked off beating shot Mike though, but that was a very brief run.
Brewster, Byrd, Ruiz, The Klitschko's (Vitali did beat him), Sam Peter, Toney....I don't really see Danny beating any of those guys.
Gotta agree with this.
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
Posted: 07 Sep 2019, 06:39
by skanksta
Only just about top 10 at his best.., but still my AT favourite boxer.

Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
Posted: 08 Sep 2019, 06:56
by Kassel
Danny Williams was ranked in the Top 10 - by both the WBC and WBA - in 2003
Well known he only got the Tyson fight - at short notice - because Kevin McBride's management were asking for too much money....
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
Posted: 09 Sep 2019, 14:16
by Ambling Alp II
It's almost as if the WBC and the WBA put Williams in the Top 10 so that his fight with Tyson would seem like a bigger deal than it was. .....Wait, there is no way that those two respected organizations would do something like that.
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
Posted: 09 Sep 2019, 17:49
by Kassel
Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑09 Sep 2019, 14:16
It's almost as if the WBC and the WBA put Williams in the Top 10 so that his fight with Tyson would seem like a bigger deal than it was. .....Wait, there is no way that those two respected organizations would do something like that.
Danny was outside the Top 10, until he signed with Don King - then, hey presto - he was ranked in the top 10 by both WBC & WBA - just pure co-incidence of course

Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
Posted: 09 Sep 2019, 17:58
by Onetimeonly
I bet 4 people $20 even up after the first Rd. Thanks Danny!
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
Posted: 10 Sep 2019, 15:15
by cormack
shite would cover it i think
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
Posted: 20 Sep 2019, 11:13
by funso banjo baby
I tend to disagree a bit.
Danny was certainly a bit short of the top level but he was a ferocious puncher in his day.
I'd have given him a fair chance against someone like Brewster.
The weird thing was Danny's strange wobbly legs syndrome. If he'd had a granite chin he'd have been a def contender at his peak...whenever that was.
anyway, he was a warrior and I wont have a bad word said about him

Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
Posted: 21 Sep 2019, 04:09
by polecateddy
British and Commonwealth level, but a level below European level as evidenced by his results.
Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........
Posted: 21 Sep 2019, 15:18
by Bodyshot3
British and Commonwealth level, but a level below European level as evidenced by his results.
That's about spot on PC
Although Danny was very decent at that Brit-Commonwealth level and certainly one or two lesser Brit champs than him managed to win the blue Euro belt in the past.
The arrival of the seriously big, quite well-schooled and very hungry Eastern European heavies shook-up the European scene in terms of quality, physical ability and ambition big time.
It was no longer a title the Brits, Italians and Germans and the odd Scandinavian shared out between themselves.