Results that look worse over time?

james5000+
Middleweight
Posts: 78
Joined: 18 Apr 2014, 21:55

Results that look worse over time?

Post by james5000+ »

Arguably the majority of GGG's wins look like utter scrubs now, not that they were super impressive when he was fighting them.

Seems like another hype job resume tbh
ALI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 14:10

Re: Results that look worse over time?

Post by ALI »

Calzaghe' win over Lacy stands out for me. Going in Lacy was viewed as a monster, and future of the division. Subsequent fights showed him to be mediocre at best. It can be argued hiw much Calzaghe took out of him that night, but for sure, in hindsight, he was way overated going into the Calzaghe bout.
tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Re: Results that look worse over time?

Post by tobyh5 »

ALI wrote: 24 Oct 2019, 00:13 Calzaghe' win over Lacy stands out for me. Going in Lacy was viewed as a monster, and future of the division. Subsequent fights showed him to be mediocre at best. It can be argued hiw much Calzaghe took out of him that night, but for sure, in hindsight, he was way overated going into the Calzaghe bout.
Agree, although luckily for Joe he has two wins which look better with time (Hopkins and Kessler)
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39344
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Results that look worse over time?

Post by margaret thatcher »

james5000+ wrote: 23 Oct 2019, 23:55 Arguably the majority of GGG's wins look like utter scrubs now, not that they were super impressive when he was fighting them.

Seems like another hype job resume tbh
LOL no sh!t it's a hype job resume :lol:
Steveh583
Super Featherweight
Posts: 4378
Joined: 24 Nov 2018, 06:06

Re: Results that look worse over time?

Post by Steveh583 »

Haye vs valuev got loads of plaudits, but sees underwhelming in hindsight.
haymakerhayman
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 30
Joined: 20 Dec 2011, 18:17

Re: Results that look worse over time?

Post by haymakerhayman »

Froch beating Bute was massively impressive at the time but lost quite a few after?
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32945
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Results that look worse over time?

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Steveh583 wrote: 24 Oct 2019, 02:22 Haye vs valuev got loads of plaudits, but sees underwhelming in hindsight.
That was mainly due to the sheer size difference though, everyone always knew Valuev couldn’t box for sh!t.
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Results that look worse over time?

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

haymakerhayman wrote: 24 Oct 2019, 02:54 Froch beating Bute was massively impressive at the time but lost quite a few after?
Id say the same but change bute with groves, taylor and kessler.

Looking back froch was decent but all of his big wins were against folk who were past it or finished. Against dirrell it was close
Ricky
Lightweight
Posts: 13914
Joined: 08 Aug 2018, 09:27

Re: Results that look worse over time?

Post by Ricky »

Froch's win over Bute. That guy was incredibly overrated.


edit/ just noticed it's already been mentioned.


fwiw his Ktfo of Groves looked better after GG bounced back.
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16809
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: Results that look worse over time?

Post by skanksta »

tobyh5 wrote: 24 Oct 2019, 00:57
ALI wrote: 24 Oct 2019, 00:13 Calzaghe' win over Lacy stands out for me. Going in Lacy was viewed as a monster, and future of the division. Subsequent fights showed him to be mediocre at best. It can be argued hiw much Calzaghe took out of him that night, but for sure, in hindsight, he was way overated going into the Calzaghe bout.
Agree, although luckily for Joe he has two wins which look better with time (Hopkins and Kessler)
I don't agree.
What about..., Lacy froze on the night and was never the same again after the mental and physical beating ?
gb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 379
Joined: 19 Jul 2007, 03:29

Re: Results that look worse over time?

Post by gb »

ThereByTheGrace wrote: 24 Oct 2019, 03:55
haymakerhayman wrote: 24 Oct 2019, 02:54 Froch beating Bute was massively impressive at the time but lost quite a few after?
Id say the same but change bute with groves, taylor and kessler.

Looking back froch was decent but all of his big wins were against folk who were past it or finished. Against dirrell it was close
Taylor had probably seen better days, yes, but Groves and Bute were both unbeaten, so it's a bit daft to say they were past it or finished. Kessler was also far from finished.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39344
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Results that look worse over time?

Post by margaret thatcher »

skanksta wrote: 24 Oct 2019, 04:48
tobyh5 wrote: 24 Oct 2019, 00:57

Agree, although luckily for Joe he has two wins which look better with time (Hopkins and Kessler)
I don't agree.
What about..., Lacy froze on the night and was never the same again after the mental and physical beating ?
Maybe both? Because even before the JC fight there were plenty of warning signs about Lacy---just struggling past Omar Sheika, level on the cards with a guy like Donnell Wiggins before pulling it out, very close with Vanderpool till stopping him too. And he was pretty much just feasting on US domestic scene guys, the type who would be on Friday Night Fights and only move beyond that as fodder. A career best win over Robin Reid isn't that impressive either.

What did he really do to say, yes, he was actually as good as hyped and Joe simply ruined him
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: Results that look worse over time?

Post by leejonesjnr »

Nah. Calzaghe broke Lacy and he was never the same again but the excellent victory stands.
What does look worse is the Robin Reid loss to Lacy as he was easily brushed aside yet had given Calzaghe a tough contest and some argue a loss.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39344
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Results that look worse over time?

Post by margaret thatcher »

What is Jeff Lacy's legacy in boxing other than being a beatdown victim. Pretty much nothing,. You have very little to work with in terms of anything impressive he accomplished before or after. Robin Reid and then a bunch of lacklustre vs US domestic scene opponents. Never rated him so the hype doesn't give the win any extra cred for me. Sakio Bika was better than him.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28510
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Results that look worse over time?

Post by Coco »

leejonesjnr wrote: 24 Oct 2019, 13:49 Nah. Calzaghe broke Lacy and he was never the same again but the excellent victory stands.
What does look worse is the Robin Reid loss to Lacy as he was easily brushed aside yet had given Calzaghe a tough contest and some argue a loss.
I agree, you can't recover from those sort of beatings
keirw
Middleweight
Posts: 2681
Joined: 03 Nov 2013, 10:55

Re: Results that look worse over time?

Post by keirw »

ThereByTheGrace wrote: 24 Oct 2019, 03:55
haymakerhayman wrote: 24 Oct 2019, 02:54 Froch beating Bute was massively impressive at the time but lost quite a few after?
Id say the same but change bute with groves, taylor and kessler.

Looking back froch was decent but all of his big wins were against folk who were past it or finished. Against dirrell it was close
Pretty sure (with the exception of Glen Johnson) all Froch's world title opponents were younger than him.

The likes of Abraham, Pascal and Groves even went on to win World titles afterwards.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39344
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Results that look worse over time?

Post by margaret thatcher »

Froch's resume ages really well actually. Even with Bute, Loosh went on to face some good opponents like Degale, Pascal, and Jack, and while he didn't win he was never close to being blown away like Froch did, and actually won maybe 4 rounds vs Degale and Jack.
Terminator666
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1665
Joined: 06 Nov 2007, 10:18

Re: Results that look worse over time?

Post by Terminator666 »

Tyson- Spinks maybe? Spinks being a blown up light heavyweight but it was a mega big fight at the time
Also Lloyd Honeyghan v Don Curry was sensational at the time
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26454
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Results that look worse over time?

Post by banjo »

Lacy suffered a serious rotator cuff injury in the fight vs Tsypko following the loss to Calzaghe, possibly contributed to his decline too.

Lacy's win over Reid looked impressive until you realise what a shambles Reid's training camp was like.
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: Results that look worse over time?

Post by Cyclops »

I’ll toss a hand grenade into the discussion.

Fury-Klitschko.

If you follow the narrative that AJ was never that good and still KO’d Wladimir, then never looked amazing again before being demolished by a fat little blob, and then throw in that Wlad had previously gone 12 with the very ordinary Bryant Jennings, then Wlad was very possibly a fighter on a serious decline. Throw in Fury’s dropping out of the rematch, the pathetic dross he’s fought since (Wilder fight excluded, although in terms of heavyweight history Wilder is CRAP) and there isn’t really that much evidence to support the theory of Fury’s brilliance.

Fury just got lucky and beat a very faded champ.

Discuss.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23095
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Results that look worse over time?

Post by mickey1975 »

Although Hammer and Del 2 look better!
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Results that look worse over time?

Post by lillywhite14 »

clopixolacuphase wrote: 25 Oct 2019, 11:36 I’ll toss a hand grenade into the discussion.

Fury-Klitschko.

If you follow the narrative that AJ was never that good and still KO’d Wladimir, then never looked amazing again before being demolished by a fat little blob, and then throw in that Wlad had previously gone 12 with the very ordinary Bryant Jennings, then Wlad was very possibly a fighter on a serious decline. Throw in Fury’s dropping out of the rematch, the pathetic dross he’s fought since (Wilder fight excluded, although in terms of heavyweight history Wilder is CRAP) and there isn’t really that much evidence to support the theory of Fury’s brilliance.

Fury just got lucky and beat a very faded champ.

Discuss.
Fair points but it was still a great win for Fury. Wlad, as diminished as he might have been, and as flawed as he always was ( already comprehensively beaten by both Brewster and Sanders etc ) was still reigning champ and had reigned for a long time. Very few here gave Fury a chance to win that night.
ALI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 14:10

Re: Results that look worse over time?

Post by ALI »

tobyh5 wrote: 24 Oct 2019, 00:57
ALI wrote: 24 Oct 2019, 00:13 Calzaghe' win over Lacy stands out for me. Going in Lacy was viewed as a monster, and future of the division. Subsequent fights showed him to be mediocre at best. It can be argued hiw much Calzaghe took out of him that night, but for sure, in hindsight, he was way overated going into the Calzaghe bout.


Agree, although luckily for Joe he has two wins which look better with time (Hopkins and Kessler)
I agree about the Hopkins win, though Joe did not look too good in the fight, he got the W and thats what matters.

I have my reservations about Kessler. No doubt he was a top quality fighter, and unbeaten when Joe fought him, but Ward did a much better job on him 2 years later, completely schooled him. It was his fights with Froch that give him the most credits, but i dont hold Kessler in quite as high a regard as many others perhaps do.

Calzaghe's entire career frustrated me, and if i am honest, as good as i believe he was, i think he is overated in retirement for what he actually achieved during his career.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 103195
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Results that look worse over time?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

ALI wrote: 26 Oct 2019, 02:36
tobyh5 wrote: 24 Oct 2019, 00:57



Agree, although luckily for Joe he has two wins which look better with time (Hopkins and Kessler)
I agree about the Hopkins win, though Joe did not look too good in the fight, he got the W and thats what matters.

I have my reservations about Kessler. No doubt he was a top quality fighter, and unbeaten when Joe fought him, but Ward did a much better job on him 2 years later, completely schooled him. It was his fights with Froch that give him the most credits, but i dont hold Kessler in quite as high a regard as many others perhaps do.

Calzaghe's entire career frustrated me, and if i am honest, as good as i believe he was, i think he is overated in retirement for what he actually achieved during his career.
I think the same..
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: Results that look worse over time?

Post by Cyclops »

mickey1975 wrote: 25 Oct 2019, 12:54 Although Hammer and Del 2 look better!
True.
Post Reply