David Haye versus Roy Jones jr.
Posted: 18 Feb 2020, 21:21
How would this play out ?
And Jones at CW and HW deserves so big deal.Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑19 Feb 2020, 11:53 Never understood at all why people make such a big deal about David Haye. Picking Jones by easy decision.
Didn't say it did.DrDuke wrote: ↑19 Feb 2020, 12:03And Jones at CW and HW deserves so big deal.Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑19 Feb 2020, 11:53 Never understood at all why people make such a big deal about David Haye. Picking Jones by easy decision.![]()
You think haye was faster than jones? That's madness. David wasn't very active at heavy, lot of feints and nothing coming from him. Jones wide on points.
As if Jones proved something superspecial against Ruiz.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑19 Feb 2020, 16:53You think haye was faster than jones? That's madness. David wasn't very active at heavy, lot of feints and nothing coming from him. Jones wide on points.
He certainly was faster than haye.DrDuke wrote: ↑21 Feb 2020, 10:36As if Jones proved something superspecial against Ruiz.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑19 Feb 2020, 16:53
You think haye was faster than jones? That's madness. David wasn't very active at heavy, lot of feints and nothing coming from him. Jones wide on points.
X2Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑19 Feb 2020, 11:53 Never understood at all why people make such a big deal about David Haye. Picking Jones by easy decision.
It's absolutely delusional to say, that Jones' resume is better than Haye's one in their mutual weights.Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑22 Feb 2020, 21:20Yeah that's right. Haye beat..... , umm, well there was.....
What does resume have to do with speed? No, Jones does not have a better resume at heavy or cruiser than David. Nothing wrong with picking haye to win, calling him faster is laughable. Ruiz has a better heavy resume than both combined and they both shellacked him. How'd that happen?DrDuke wrote: ↑23 Feb 2020, 00:13It's absolutely delusional to say, that Jones' resume is better than Haye's one in their mutual weights.Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑22 Feb 2020, 21:20
Yeah that's right. Haye beat..... , umm, well there was.....
The thing is, Jones didn't prove his speed as something special particularly at HW. His performance against Ruiz wasn't too impressive. It sounded better, than it looked. Light heavyweight beat heavyweight, ok, but that heavyweight sucked. Jones, of course, was faster with his normal weight, but with a heavyweight build it's a different thing.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑28 Feb 2020, 15:35What does resume have to do with speed? No, Jones does not have a better resume at heavy or cruiser than David. Nothing wrong with picking haye to win, calling him faster is laughable. Ruiz has a better heavy resume than both combined and they both shellacked him. How'd that happen?
Haye has a quite impressive CW resume. We probably shouldn't look at Jones at CW at all, cause he competed there when he was way past it. But at HW Haye even whooped Ruiz in a more impressive fashion, because he didn't just outboxed him, but also battered. Chisora demolition was a great performance too and a very good scalp. These two fights already can give a hint, how Haye-Jones heavyweight bout could have looked like.Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑28 Feb 2020, 15:25 Not really going by "resume". Obviously Jones only fight in his career above light heavy.
I would pick some great fighters at lower weights to beat far less fighters that were in a weight class above them. It's not exactly a radical thought.
But no, I am not at all impressed by Haye's resume. He doesn't have one win in his entire career that make me think he was that good at all.
DrDuke wrote: ↑29 Feb 2020, 09:48The thing is, Jones didn't prove his speed as something special particularly at HW. His performance against Ruiz wasn't too impressive. It sounded better, than it looked. Light heavyweight beat heavyweight, ok, but that heavyweight sucked. Jones, of course, was faster with his normal weight, but with a heavyweight build it's a different thing.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑28 Feb 2020, 15:35
What does resume have to do with speed? No, Jones does not have a better resume at heavy or cruiser than David. Nothing wrong with picking haye to win, calling him faster is laughable. Ruiz has a better heavy resume than both combined and they both shellacked him. How'd that happen?
Yeah, Ruiz wasn't past it at all.DrDuke wrote: ↑29 Feb 2020, 09:54Haye has a quite impressive CW resume. We probably shouldn't look at Jones at CW at all, cause he competed there when he was way past it. But at HW Haye even whooped Ruiz in a more impressive fashion, because he didn't just outboxed him, but also battered. Chisora demolition was a great performance too and a very good scalp. These two fights already can give a hint, how Haye-Jones heavyweight bout could have looked like.Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑28 Feb 2020, 15:25 Not really going by "resume". Obviously Jones only fight in his career above light heavy.
I would pick some great fighters at lower weights to beat far less fighters that were in a weight class above them. It's not exactly a radical thought.
But no, I am not at all impressed by Haye's resume. He doesn't have one win in his entire career that make me think he was that good at all.
As if in his prime he was much better.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑29 Feb 2020, 14:10Yeah, Ruiz wasn't past it at all.DrDuke wrote: ↑29 Feb 2020, 09:54
Haye has a quite impressive CW resume. We probably shouldn't look at Jones at CW at all, cause he competed there when he was way past it. But at HW Haye even whooped Ruiz in a more impressive fashion, because he didn't just outboxed him, but also battered. Chisora demolition was a great performance too and a very good scalp. These two fights already can give a hint, how Haye-Jones heavyweight bout could have looked like.![]()