Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Post by Enlightened-One »

Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

The WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt will also be at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin in the finale of 'Fight Camp'

Whyte defends his WBC 'interim' heavyweight title against Povetkin on August 22, live on Sky Sports Box Office, and the governing body will also present the WBC 'Diamond' belt to the winner in recognition of the fight's significance.

The Brixton man risks his status as the WBC mandatory challenger, with the WBC confirming that the winner of Tyson Fury's expected third fight with Deontay Wilder must defend the WBC belt against Whyte in early 2021.

The WBC have created their first ever WBC 'Diamond' belt for a heavyweight bout, and past recipients of the title include Filipino star Manny Pacquiao following his 12th round stoppage of Miguel Cotto in November 2009.

"I'm very excited about it," WBC president Mauricio Sulaiman told Sky Sports. "I believe that this fight has all the merits for the WBC to award the prestigious 'Diamond' belt.

"Both are sensational fighters. Povetkin and Whyte are former 'Silver' champions of the WBC. They have been training in extreme circumstances and they are very professional.

"The WBC is delighted to be part of the fight as the WBC 'interim' championship and also to award the 'Diamond' belt, which is a special trophy to recognise this great bout."

Whyte had previously welcomed a fight against Fury for the WBC 'Diamond' belt in May 2019, but his British rival instead fought Tom Schwarz in Las Vegas that summer.


Thoughts? :-?
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Post by Enlightened-One »

Dillian Whyte has engaged in numerous title eliminators, became the WBC's highest-rated fighter, earned mandatory challenger status and also captured the WBC international, silver, interim belts and will probably add the diamond strap to his collection too.

But the WBC are still a bit sketchy on the timescale for his long-awaited world title challenge.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13871
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Post by DrDuke »

All these straps suck. But Whyte is indeed a contender, he has an excellent winning streak. The same can be said about Povetkin, although his real title challenge is quite recent. Anyway, this Whyte-Povetkin bout is to determine the biggest WBC contender. However, no one will prefer to see the winner against Fury-Wilder 3 winner, who will be Fury, if Fury makes a deal with Joshua-Pulev winner, who will be Joshua. But, if Joshua fights Usyk after Pulev, Fury's bout against Whyte-Povetkin winner will be good.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39207
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Post by margaret thatcher »

The response I see from the other dudes is usually like : Whyte turned down Ortiz!
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Post by gilgamesh »

It's a good fight between 2 contenders.

That's it. Whatever else they want to say about it is irrelevant. I'm sure the winner will still be a highly ranked contender, not that it means they'll definitely be getting a shot anytime soon. Whyte sure knows that game by now :lol:
H8Usernames
Featherweight
Posts: 1196
Joined: 21 Mar 2020, 21:02

Re: Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Post by H8Usernames »

margaret thatcher wrote: 14 Aug 2020, 13:49 The response I see from the other dudes is usually like : Whyte turned down Ortiz!
He did? I think that I'd pick Ortiz for that one.
Evander
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13971
Joined: 07 May 2005, 16:49

Re: Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Post by Evander »

Gotta feel for Dillian Whyte, he's been waiting for a shot for sometime now, I hope Dillian can remain patient as he's way overdo a crack at a title.
Povetkin may give him a test for awhile, but the longer it goes the worse it will get for him once the accumulation of Whytes power takes affect.
I don't see it going 12 but you never know.
It's just a matter of Dillian keeping his head and boxing to orders and to turn up the heat the further the fight goes and he should register a stoppage win.
H8Usernames
Featherweight
Posts: 1196
Joined: 21 Mar 2020, 21:02

Re: Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Post by H8Usernames »

Evander wrote: 14 Aug 2020, 21:15 Gotta feel for Dillian Whyte, he's been waiting for a shot for sometime now, I hope Dillian can remain patient as he's way overdo a crack at a title.
Povetkin may give him a test for awhile, but the longer it goes the worse it will get for him once the accumulation of Whytes power takes affect.
I don't see it going 12 but you never know.
It's just a matter of Dillian keeping his head and boxing to orders and to turn up the heat the further the fight goes and he should register a stoppage win.
Yeah I feel so deeply for that punk that always behaves like a loser. This one is hard to pick, certainly gonna be an interesting fight.
Evander
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13971
Joined: 07 May 2005, 16:49

Re: Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Post by Evander »

H8Usernames wrote: 14 Aug 2020, 21:19
Evander wrote: 14 Aug 2020, 21:15 Gotta feel for Dillian Whyte, he's been waiting for a shot for sometime now, I hope Dillian can remain patient as he's way overdo a crack at a title.
Povetkin may give him a test for awhile, but the longer it goes the worse it will get for him once the accumulation of Whytes power takes affect.
I don't see it going 12 but you never know.
It's just a matter of Dillian keeping his head and boxing to orders and to turn up the heat the further the fight goes and he should register a stoppage win.
Yeah I feel so deeply for that punk that always behaves like a loser. This one is hard to pick, certainly gonna be an interesting fight.
I'm just talking about him in terms of waiting for a shot he deserves.
I heard he split from his trainer, not sure what to make of that at this point except to say something can't be right in the camp.
Some have said he's difficult to deal with, however he's a very strong fighter and I'll be surprised if Povetkin gets by him at this stage of his career.
Evander
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13971
Joined: 07 May 2005, 16:49

Re: Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Post by Evander »

This isn't a slag off of Dillian Whyte, it's more of a good boxer in an awkward set of circumstances.
So what do we have at the top of the Heavyweight division, Tyson followed by AJ and Deontay, Dillian, Usyk and Ruiz bring up the middle, the back end consists of a whole bunch of fighters on the periphery of the division, some on the way up some on the way down.
Top 3
What's gonna happen ?
If they don't make Fury v AJ then something is wrong, it's a no brainer, Wilder should step aside and not force Fury to fight him.
Wilder got his ass kicked by Fury, it was bordering brutal at times, why would you take a third fight now ?
Two easier warm up opponents and set up a Fury bout down the road, even a Joshua fight too, we all want to see those match ups.
Rest is good, Wilder has a name in the division that will get him fights with just about anybody for the next few years let alone the A list Heavyweights.
Regardless of how highly you rank Deontay as a boxer there most likely will be action, that's part of his brand.
H8Usernames
Featherweight
Posts: 1196
Joined: 21 Mar 2020, 21:02

Re: Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Post by H8Usernames »

Evander wrote: 14 Aug 2020, 21:32
H8Usernames wrote: 14 Aug 2020, 21:19
Evander wrote: 14 Aug 2020, 21:15 Gotta feel for Dillian Whyte, he's been waiting for a shot for sometime now, I hope Dillian can remain patient as he's way overdo a crack at a title.
Povetkin may give him a test for awhile, but the longer it goes the worse it will get for him once the accumulation of Whytes power takes affect.
I don't see it going 12 but you never know.
It's just a matter of Dillian keeping his head and boxing to orders and to turn up the heat the further the fight goes and he should register a stoppage win.
Yeah I feel so deeply for that punk that always behaves like a loser. This one is hard to pick, certainly gonna be an interesting fight.
I'm just talking about him in terms of waiting for a shot he deserves.
I heard he split from his trainer, not sure what to make of that at this point except to say something can't be right in the camp.
Some have said he's difficult to deal with, however he's a very strong fighter and I'll be surprised if Povetkin gets by him at this stage of his career.
He doesnt deserve anything really. Let him duke it out with ancient Ortiz and the big swedish guy and then we can talk about what someone deserves and well then there is the whole Andy Ruiz question.
candyslim
Super Lightweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Post by candyslim »

People like you are the reason I don't much bother with this forum anymore.

How can you claim to be a boxing fan and not appreciate a warrior like Dillian Whyte? The guy continually risks his status taking on opponents most of the top heavyweights keep well clear of.

Povetkin is a case in point. He's past prime but still very dangerous in the early rounds, ask Joshua. I expect Dillian to grind him down and force the stoppage but Whyte can be vulnerable before he gets into his stride, and I wouldn't be surprised if Povetkin were to stop him early. If it goes past five Whyte will win but that is by no means assured.

I admire skillfull boxing, speed, punching power etcetera but for me there is no fighter more admirable than those who will repeatedly risk fighting top opposition in a fight that doesn't involve a serious title (I don't count a worthless piece of crap like the so-called diamond belt) especially one like Whyte who is not blessed with extraordinary talent.

I don't expect you to like the guy but if you can't applaud his fighting heart then you're not worth arguing with.
a93
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 56
Joined: 12 Aug 2020, 16:26

Re: Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Post by a93 »

candyslim wrote: 18 Aug 2020, 14:44 People like you are the reason I don't much bother with this forum anymore.

How can you claim to be a boxing fan and not appreciate a warrior like Dillian Whyte? The guy continually risks his status taking on opponents most of the top heavyweights keep well clear of.

Povetkin is a case in point. He's past prime but still very dangerous in the early rounds, ask Joshua. I expect Dillian to grind him down and force the stoppage but Whyte can be vulnerable before he gets into his stride, and I wouldn't be surprised if Povetkin were to stop him early. If it goes past five Whyte will win but that is by no means assured.

I admire skillfull boxing, speed, punching power etcetera but for me there is no fighter more admirable than those who will repeatedly risk fighting top opposition in a fight that doesn't involve a serious title (I don't count a worthless piece of crap like the so-called diamond belt) especially one like Whyte who is not blessed with extraordinary talent.

I don't expect you to like the guy but if you can't applaud his fighting heart then you're not worth arguing with.
Not sure where Whyte has got this rep from. He turned down the Joshua fight and eliminators with Pulev and Ortiz. His last 5 of Browne, Chisora, Parker, Rivas and Wach isn’t much to write home about IMO.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39207
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Post by margaret thatcher »

If he wins this he'll have

Pov
Parker
Chis x2
Rivas
Helenius
Wach
Browne
Joshua (loss)


Let's be honest, that's pretty good , arguably 6 wins over guys still in the top 15-20, very few dudes in the division matching that and it really makes him one of the last guys in the division who should have his record criticized--he's constantly fought solid opposition for sure. You can find holes in anyone else's record too. I'd much rather have a guy run his mouth and beat good opposition than just be some supposed boogeyman who beats Trav Kauffman and Raz Cojanu and worse etc

I've grown to despise the careers of these can crushing front runners and they usually fail when stepped up vs the top guys who actually do fight good opposition
Finkel
Super Featherweight
Posts: 1380
Joined: 08 Sep 2018, 20:51

Re: Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Post by Finkel »

For me there are only two heavyweights with better records across their last five fights:
Fury
and
Joshua

That is it. If people don't want to acknowledge that Whyte has a strong record, well that's on them. But bringing up Joshua, Pulev and Ortiz out of context does no one any favors.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100768
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

margaret thatcher wrote: 18 Aug 2020, 19:51 If he wins this he'll have

Pov
Parker
Chis x2
Rivas
Helenius
Wach
Browne
Joshua (loss)


Let's be honest, that's pretty good , arguably 6 wins over guys still in the top 15-20, very few dudes in the division matching that and it really makes him one of the last guys in the division who should have his record criticized--he's constantly fought solid opposition for sure. You can find holes in anyone else's record too. I'd much rather have a guy run his mouth and beat good opposition than just be some supposed boogeyman who beats Trav Kauffman and Raz Cojanu and worse etc

I've grown to despise the careers of these can crushing front runners and they usually fail when stepped up vs the top guys who actually do fight good opposition
Then you can always nitpick his wins.. as you can with many other fights..

Parker - Controversial
Chis - Controversial
Rivas - post-fight became controversial

and so on..
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13871
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Post by DrDuke »

Whyte's resume is damn good. The list itself is impressive, but I won't call it much controversial. Actually, I'd only say, that Chisora won their first bout. Even the second one was totally controlled by Whyte, I don't agree with the scorecards prior to the stoppage. Parker gave Whyte a bit of hell, especially late in the fight, but still Whyte won it clearly, as for me. The PED scandal after Rivas? I don't give a damn, all of them are on PEDs. Only Joshua and Fury have better resumes indeed. And Povetkin is about the same.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39207
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Post by margaret thatcher »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 19 Aug 2020, 08:38
margaret thatcher wrote: 18 Aug 2020, 19:51 If he wins this he'll have

Pov
Parker
Chis x2
Rivas
Helenius
Wach
Browne
Joshua (loss)


Let's be honest, that's pretty good , arguably 6 wins over guys still in the top 15-20, very few dudes in the division matching that and it really makes him one of the last guys in the division who should have his record criticized--he's constantly fought solid opposition for sure. You can find holes in anyone else's record too. I'd much rather have a guy run his mouth and beat good opposition than just be some supposed boogeyman who beats Trav Kauffman and Raz Cojanu and worse etc

I've grown to despise the careers of these can crushing front runners and they usually fail when stepped up vs the top guys who actually do fight good opposition
Then you can always nitpick his wins.. as you can with many other fights..

Parker - Controversial
Chis - Controversial
Rivas - post-fight became controversial

and so on..
Ya, as I said

Can do it with any win, with any guy, it balances out usually. If you see someone only doing it for 1 guy theyre prob a biased cunter
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39207
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Post by margaret thatcher »

Whatever happened to our boi Ewey? I remember him slating AJ for fighting Pov, cause Pov was apparently too old, yet then he recommended Luis Ortiz as an opponent :lol:
joshj909
Lightweight
Posts: 5879
Joined: 01 Dec 2017, 06:16

Re: Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Post by joshj909 »

H8Usernames wrote: 16 Aug 2020, 10:59
Evander wrote: 14 Aug 2020, 21:32
H8Usernames wrote: 14 Aug 2020, 21:19

Yeah I feel so deeply for that punk that always behaves like a loser. This one is hard to pick, certainly gonna be an interesting fight.
I'm just talking about him in terms of waiting for a shot he deserves.
I heard he split from his trainer, not sure what to make of that at this point except to say something can't be right in the camp.
Some have said he's difficult to deal with, however he's a very strong fighter and I'll be surprised if Povetkin gets by him at this stage of his career.
He doesnt deserve anything really. Let him duke it out with ancient Ortiz and the big swedish guy and then we can talk about what someone deserves and well then there is the whole Andy Ruiz question.
Are you saying that top 5 in the world Whyte needs to fight fringe top 50 Wallin to justify himself deserving a title shot? :lol:
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39207
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Post by margaret thatcher »

Compare Dom Breazeale's route to becoming mandatory and getting a shot (his 2nd) to Whyte's lol
candyslim
Super Lightweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Post by candyslim »

a93 wrote: 18 Aug 2020, 17:15 Not sure where Whyte has got this rep from. He turned down the Joshua fight and eliminators with Pulev and Ortiz. His last 5 of Browne, Chisora, Parker, Rivas and Wach isn’t much to write home about IMO.
Ok I'll bite. Let's analyse this shall we ...

Firstly Whyte has been the WBC number one for a ridiculous amount of time without getting a title shot. People say "Ah but he wasn't mandatory all that time". That's true but only because WeBeCorrupt broke their own rules by matching their number 6 Breazeale with the unranked Molina for the mandatory slot totally ignoring the rights of their long-term number one contender. WTF was Molina getting a chance for? A man known as "The drummer boy" presumably because like a drum he is regarded as an instrument for beating on.

How many guys in Whyte's position are going to risk their (very hard earned) guaranteed title-shot by taking on a live opponent, never mind a fading but still world-class fighter like Povetkin, when they don't need to?

Povetkin broke Joshua's nose and boxed rings around him until his age and AJ's power punches caught up with him. Pulev is a mandatory challenger. When was the last time he fought an elite fighter, in fact when in his long career has he ever beaten an elite opponent? Arguably his best win was Chisora whom Whyte has beaten twice. The guy has built a career out of fighting fringe-contenders.

You say he ducked Joshua. I don't think the fight suited either of them at that time. Joshua was looking to break out in the States once Wilder wasn't interested in taking the 19th April date. A reputedly low-ball offer was made to Whyte and rejected but look at it from Whyte's point of view. He's not scared of Joshua but he's intelligent enough to know he could lose like he did before. He was starting out on the road to becoming a very wealthy man courtesy of his Sky PPV status. What if he lost, would he still be a PPV star? Maybe he would now that Sky know he is very popular and pulls in the punters but maybe not then.

Whyte decided not to pursue that route. Like Tyson Fury, Whyte identified Wilder as a very beatable opponent and felt that if he could get Wilder in the ring he would beat him and be able to face Joshua in a unification extravaganza which would make him very rich win or lose. Unfortunately Fury was of the same ambition and he had an advantage over Whyte in that he was looking extremely vulnerable and a much more appealing potential victim for Haymon and Finkel. so he was permitted by Haymon/Sulaiman to jump ahead of the mandatory challenger.

You say he ducked Ortiz. Whyte had already more than earned his title shot and was infuriated by the WBC putting up yet another hoop for him to jump through. I believe Whyte and Hearn when they say that Ortiz has thrice turned down offers to face Whyte. Whyte clearly isn't scared of Povetkin - a younger fighter whose achievements in boxing dwarf those of Ortiz - why would he be scared of Ortiz? We found out how trustworthy is the word of Ortiz when he turned down £7m or was it 8 to face Joshua and was forced to retract his claim that Hearn had sent him a low-ball offer, when Hearn threatened to publish the correspondence.

You say he ducked Pulev: Why would Whyte want to fly to Sofia to earn comparative peanuts in order to win the right to get 25% of the purse as mandatory for Joshua? Whyte and Joshua are stablemates. They both want to fight each other at a time when it's convenient to both. Whyte will expect to do a lot better than 25% of the purse. Miller didn't want the opportunity either and it would have been a much more attractive opportunity for him. As it was Whyte faced Joseph Parker instead, for vastly more money than he would have got in Bulgaria. It helped him cement his PPV status and Parker is a much more credible opponent than Pulev anyway yet still people talk crap about him ducking Pulev.

Ok so his last opponents. We can ignore Wach. Whyte was way out of shape and just needed a keep-busy fight.

Rivas was undefeated and had recently beaten Bryant Jennings - Luis Ortiz's best win by a country-mile and the man Ortiz has built his bogeyman reputation on. Rivas is is a fierce little bstrd and had Dillian on the deck. I don't see a stampede of heavyweights rushing to fight Rivas.

Chisora: "Loser to the stars" as a fine former poster used to call him. Chisora hasn't beaten any top heavyweight and is vulnerable to anyone who can box and move behind the jab, but if you aren't a mover and you stand and trade with him, he's your worst nightmare. Whyte is adding movement to his game as we saw in the second fight but the first was a war.
He is never going to find Chisora an easy opponent like Fury did, it's a question of styles. Chisora was and is a formidable opponent for a fighter like Whyte.

Parker: Was a former world title holder who had got a decision over Andy Ruiz Jnr. and only lost one fight and that was against Joshua. The guy is still one of the best heavies around in my opinion but he needs to pull his finger out and start reminding people of that. He was expected to be a really tough opponent for Whyte and that's how it proved. It was seen as a huge risk, a genuine 50/50 and Whyte was lucky to emerge with the win.

Browne: Ok he was sh*t but Dillian didn't know he was going to be. Browne was a former world champion of sorts and was unbeaten. He had a come-from-behind knock-out of Ruslan Chagaev in his own backyard. The fight looked a genuine 50/50 and as a Dillian Whyte fan, I was worried for him. You might now sneer but facing Browne was a very bold move and not one that most heavies were contemplating.

Sorry for the length, it's hard to cover all the points and be brief. I do hope you might have a better insight into Dillian Whyte's rep now.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Post by Enlightened-One »

a93 wrote: 18 Aug 2020, 17:15Not sure where Whyte has got this rep from. He turned down the Joshua fight and eliminators with Pulev and Ortiz.
Dillian Whyte decided to reject the opportunity to compete in an IBF final eliminator, against Kubrat Pulev, because he was only receiving a 25% purse split to compete on the Bulgarian’s home turf, which equated to a paltry $375K (as per the purse bid won by Epic Sports & Entertainment). The Bulgarian was being paid three times more than the Brit’s sum.

Kubrat Pulev ended up facing Hughie Fury in the IBF’s final eliminator, whereas Dillian Whyte fought Joseph Parker instead, with both the Brit & the Kiwi pocketing slightly more than $1.3m each.

Moving onto the next point, Dillian Whyte received an offer from Matchroom to face AJ that was a smaller payday than the sum Matchroom paid him to engage in the Dereck Chisora rematch.

Eddie Hearn didn’t dispute media claims about the lowball offer, but instead attempted to justify it by arguing that Whyte should take the pay cut for an opportunity to gain ownership of the “keys to the kingdom” (i.e. prioritise sporting glory over financial self-worth).

Coincidentally, shortly after Whyte declined Matchroom’s offer to engage in the rematch with Anthony Joshua, Eddie Hearn subsequently offered the bout to Jarrell Miller instead and even provided the American with a bigger purse than the sum that Whyte was offered. The package was supposedly $6.96m.

The purse that Jarrell Miller was offered to face AJ, was much bigger than the purse Dillian Whyte declined, at least by a $2m margin.

Addressing your final point... On the 25th April 2018, the WBC officially ordered the final eliminator between Luis Ortiz and Dillian Whyte.

The Cuban allegedly declined the opportunity to face Dillian Whyte on the 28th July 2018, which was accompanied with a $2.54m purse offer, because he claimed the scheduled fight-date was too soon for him. However, Ortiz actually ended up fighting on that date anyway, when he engaged in the preposterous Razvan Cojanu mismatch.

This assertion was communicated to the media by Eddie Hearn and Dillian Whyte. And I don’t believe this claim has been officially refuted by the Cuban’s team, but even if they had done so, Ortiz's handlers have a proven track record of lying about the financial offers they’ve received (i.e. as per Matchroom’s allegedly “lowball” and “BS” offer for the AJ fight).

Meanwhile, Dillian Whyte had to find an alternative opponent for his 28th July bout, so he chose to face an even better fighter named Joseph Parker (as per ESPN's & The RING's ratings).
a93
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 56
Joined: 12 Aug 2020, 16:26

Re: Whyte vs Povetkin: WBC's prestigious 'Diamond' belt also at stake when Dillian Whyte battles Alexander Povetkin

Post by a93 »

candyslim wrote: 21 Aug 2020, 08:44
a93 wrote: 18 Aug 2020, 17:15 Not sure where Whyte has got this rep from. He turned down the Joshua fight and eliminators with Pulev and Ortiz. His last 5 of Browne, Chisora, Parker, Rivas and Wach isn’t much to write home about IMO.
Ok I'll bite. Let's analyse this shall we ...

Firstly Whyte has been the WBC number one for a ridiculous amount of time without getting a title shot. People say "Ah but he wasn't mandatory all that time". That's true but only because WeBeCorrupt broke their own rules by matching their number 6 Breazeale with the unranked Molina for the mandatory slot totally ignoring the rights of their long-term number one contender. WTF was Molina getting a chance for? A man known as "The drummer boy" presumably because like a drum he is regarded as an instrument for beating on.

How many guys in Whyte's position are going to risk their (very hard earned) guaranteed title-shot by taking on a live opponent, never mind a fading but still world-class fighter like Povetkin, when they don't need to?

Povetkin broke Joshua's nose and boxed rings around him until his age and AJ's power punches caught up with him. Pulev is a mandatory challenger. When was the last time he fought an elite fighter, in fact when in his long career has he ever beaten an elite opponent? Arguably his best win was Chisora whom Whyte has beaten twice. The guy has built a career out of fighting fringe-contenders.

You say he ducked Joshua. I don't think the fight suited either of them at that time. Joshua was looking to break out in the States once Wilder wasn't interested in taking the 19th April date. A reputedly low-ball offer was made to Whyte and rejected but look at it from Whyte's point of view. He's not scared of Joshua but he's intelligent enough to know he could lose like he did before. He was starting out on the road to becoming a very wealthy man courtesy of his Sky PPV status. What if he lost, would he still be a PPV star? Maybe he would now that Sky know he is very popular and pulls in the punters but maybe not then.

Whyte decided not to pursue that route. Like Tyson Fury, Whyte identified Wilder as a very beatable opponent and felt that if he could get Wilder in the ring he would beat him and be able to face Joshua in a unification extravaganza which would make him very rich win or lose. Unfortunately Fury was of the same ambition and he had an advantage over Whyte in that he was looking extremely vulnerable and a much more appealing potential victim for Haymon and Finkel. so he was permitted by Haymon/Sulaiman to jump ahead of the mandatory challenger.

You say he ducked Ortiz. Whyte had already more than earned his title shot and was infuriated by the WBC putting up yet another hoop for him to jump through. I believe Whyte and Hearn when they say that Ortiz has thrice turned down offers to face Whyte. Whyte clearly isn't scared of Povetkin - a younger fighter whose achievements in boxing dwarf those of Ortiz - why would he be scared of Ortiz? We found out how trustworthy is the word of Ortiz when he turned down £7m or was it 8 to face Joshua and was forced to retract his claim that Hearn had sent him a low-ball offer, when Hearn threatened to publish the correspondence.

You say he ducked Pulev: Why would Whyte want to fly to Sofia to earn comparative peanuts in order to win the right to get 25% of the purse as mandatory for Joshua? Whyte and Joshua are stablemates. They both want to fight each other at a time when it's convenient to both. Whyte will expect to do a lot better than 25% of the purse. Miller didn't want the opportunity either and it would have been a much more attractive opportunity for him. As it was Whyte faced Joseph Parker instead, for vastly more money than he would have got in Bulgaria. It helped him cement his PPV status and Parker is a much more credible opponent than Pulev anyway yet still people talk crap about him ducking Pulev.

Ok so his last opponents. We can ignore Wach. Whyte was way out of shape and just needed a keep-busy fight.

Rivas was undefeated and had recently beaten Bryant Jennings - Luis Ortiz's best win by a country-mile and the man Ortiz has built his bogeyman reputation on. Rivas is is a fierce little bstrd and had Dillian on the deck. I don't see a stampede of heavyweights rushing to fight Rivas.

Chisora: "Loser to the stars" as a fine former poster used to call him. Chisora hasn't beaten any top heavyweight and is vulnerable to anyone who can box and move behind the jab, but if you aren't a mover and you stand and trade with him, he's your worst nightmare. Whyte is adding movement to his game as we saw in the second fight but the first was a war.
He is never going to find Chisora an easy opponent like Fury did, it's a question of styles. Chisora was and is a formidable opponent for a fighter like Whyte.

Parker: Was a former world title holder who had got a decision over Andy Ruiz Jnr. and only lost one fight and that was against Joshua. The guy is still one of the best heavies around in my opinion but he needs to pull his finger out and start reminding people of that. He was expected to be a really tough opponent for Whyte and that's how it proved. It was seen as a huge risk, a genuine 50/50 and Whyte was lucky to emerge with the win.

Browne: Ok he was sh*t but Dillian didn't know he was going to be. Browne was a former world champion of sorts and was unbeaten. He had a come-from-behind knock-out of Ruslan Chagaev in his own backyard. The fight looked a genuine 50/50 and as a Dillian Whyte fan, I was worried for him. You might now sneer but facing Browne was a very bold move and not one that most heavies were contemplating.

Sorry for the length, it's hard to cover all the points and be brief. I do hope you might have a better insight into Dillian Whyte's rep now.
No need to apologise, it’s a boxing forum and everyone’s entitled to their opinions. I enjoy the debate.

Sky pushed the narrative nobody wanted to fight Rivas but he was losing on points to Jennings until the 12th round KO. Jennings lost his next fight to Joe Joyce who people don’t rate.

Parker had just lost almost every round to AJ yet arguably deserved a draw with Whyte if it wasn’t for a clash of heads being scored as a knockdown. He’d have probably finished Whyte off if he had another 30 seconds.

Chisora is European level and Whyte went life and death with him twice. Any top heavyweight these days would get rid of Chisora no problem.

I don’t dislike Whyte. I find his fights entertaining. I don’t rate his footwork and his stamina, although he does look in good shape for this fight - but he comes to fight and he’s been in some good 50/50’s (Parker and Chisora).
Post Reply