Vitali vs ....

margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39242
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Vitali vs ....

Post by margaret thatcher »

Oliver McCall

James Smith
Woldemar
Super Welterweight
Posts: 6284
Joined: 03 Jul 2014, 07:52

Re: Vitali vs ....

Post by Woldemar »

Vitali UD 12 (117-111) McCall

Vitali UD 12 ( 116-112) Smith
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13873
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Vitali vs ....

Post by DrDuke »

McCall would be outboxed to a wide decision.

Bonecrusher could make it a fight, but still Klitschko would edge there.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15678
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Vitali vs ....

Post by elmersalsa »

Is Vitali Klitschko versus two goofy-goofy guys. I don't know how did those two became champions.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13873
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Vitali vs ....

Post by DrDuke »

elmersalsa wrote: 08 Sep 2020, 10:29 Is Vitali Klitschko versus two goofy-goofy guys. I don't know how did those two became champions.
Both had unmotivated opponents, when became champions. However, Bonecrusher was much better than McCall.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Vitali vs ....

Post by Onetimeonly »

Not sure what made bone crusher much better than McCall, but I'd take vit to outpoint both.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13873
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Vitali vs ....

Post by DrDuke »

Onetimeonly wrote: 08 Sep 2020, 23:44 Not sure what made bone crusher much better than McCall
Bonecrusher was tougher and sharper as fighter, what made him a more dangerous opponent.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Vitali vs ....

Post by Onetimeonly »

DrDuke wrote: 09 Sep 2020, 05:28
Onetimeonly wrote: 08 Sep 2020, 23:44 Not sure what made bone crusher much better than McCall
Bonecrusher was tougher and sharper as fighter, what made him a more dangerous opponent.
Tougher? :lol:
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13873
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Vitali vs ....

Post by DrDuke »

Onetimeonly wrote: 09 Sep 2020, 10:21
DrDuke wrote: 09 Sep 2020, 05:28
Onetimeonly wrote: 08 Sep 2020, 23:44 Not sure what made bone crusher much better than McCall
Bonecrusher was tougher and sharper as fighter, what made him a more dangerous opponent.
Tougher? :lol:
You probably don't get it. He was tougher as a fighter, not in terms of chin. I mean, he could bring it anytime.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Vitali vs ....

Post by Onetimeonly »

DrDuke wrote: 09 Sep 2020, 10:29
Onetimeonly wrote: 09 Sep 2020, 10:21
DrDuke wrote: 09 Sep 2020, 05:28

Bonecrusher was tougher and sharper as fighter, what made him a more dangerous opponent.
Tougher? :lol:
You probably don't get it. He was tougher as a fighter, not in terms of chin. I mean, he could bring it anytime.
Yeah, my mistake. :roll:
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46375
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Vitali vs ....

Post by gilgamesh »

Vitali by UD in both fights.
Bodyshot3
Middleweight
Posts: 9791
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 15:19

Re: Vitali vs ....

Post by Bodyshot3 »

Vitali wins both.....and in the case of McCall who blew so hot and cold, a stoppage is not out of the question.

I also think Smith makes a far better fist of it....he was a big, organised powerful (if limited) HW, unlikely to be bullied and he travelled well. He came over to London and definitely dealt with Bruno's power, a hostile atmosphere and won big late in the day....he also reversed an earlier bad result against 'Spoon.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Vitali vs ....

Post by Onetimeonly »

McCall didn't blow hot and cold taking punches. Vitali couldn't hurt him with a bat.
Evander
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 14026
Joined: 07 May 2005, 16:49

Re: Vitali vs ....

Post by Evander »

Klitschko could outbox McCall easy.
Oliver didn't have those skills.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Vitali vs ....

Post by Onetimeonly »

Evander wrote: 11 Sep 2020, 05:06 Klitschko could outbox McCall easy.
Oliver didn't have those skills.
He'd be the best vitali ever beat.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13873
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Vitali vs ....

Post by DrDuke »

Onetimeonly wrote: 11 Sep 2020, 08:24
Evander wrote: 11 Sep 2020, 05:06 Klitschko could outbox McCall easy.
Oliver didn't have those skills.
He'd be the best vitali ever beat.
In terms of achievements - yes, but some of Vitali's opponents could handle McCall. It would be no surprise, if the likes of Peter, Adamek or Chisora did that.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Vitali vs ....

Post by Onetimeonly »

DrDuke wrote: 11 Sep 2020, 09:33
Onetimeonly wrote: 11 Sep 2020, 08:24
Evander wrote: 11 Sep 2020, 05:06 Klitschko could outbox McCall easy.
Oliver didn't have those skills.
He'd be the best vitali ever beat.
In terms of achievements - yes, but some of Vitali's opponents could handle McCall. It would be no surprise, if the likes of Peter, Adamek or Chisora did that.
:lol:
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13873
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Vitali vs ....

Post by DrDuke »

It would be more surprizing, if idiOTO answered something more than just his favorite emoji. :OhYes:
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Vitali vs ....

Post by oogiebe »

Adamek??!!!
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13873
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Vitali vs ....

Post by DrDuke »

oogiebe wrote: 11 Sep 2020, 10:27Adamek??!!!
And why not? At his best he was a technically solid boxer with decent skillset.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Vitali vs ....

Post by oogiebe »

DrDuke wrote: 11 Sep 2020, 10:32
oogiebe wrote: 11 Sep 2020, 10:27Adamek??!!!
And why not? At his best he was a technically solid boxer with decent skillset.
:o
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13873
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Vitali vs ....

Post by DrDuke »

oogiebe wrote: 11 Sep 2020, 10:38
DrDuke wrote: 11 Sep 2020, 10:32
oogiebe wrote: 11 Sep 2020, 10:27Adamek??!!!
And why not? At his best he was a technically solid boxer with decent skillset.
:o
You act like you've only seen Adamek's fights against Molina and Miller.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Vitali vs ....

Post by oogiebe »

DrDuke wrote: 11 Sep 2020, 10:42
oogiebe wrote: 11 Sep 2020, 10:38
DrDuke wrote: 11 Sep 2020, 10:32

And why not? At his best he was a technically solid boxer with decent skillset.
:o
You act like you've only seen Adamek's fights against Molina and Miller.
Wow you deduced all that. Wrong again Dukie.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13873
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Vitali vs ....

Post by DrDuke »

oogiebe wrote: 11 Sep 2020, 10:46
DrDuke wrote: 11 Sep 2020, 10:42
oogiebe wrote: 11 Sep 2020, 10:38

:o
You act like you've only seen Adamek's fights against Molina and Miller.
Wow you deduced all that. Wrong again Dukie.
"Whatever" (c)
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Vitali vs ....

Post by oogiebe »

DrDuke wrote: 11 Sep 2020, 10:48
oogiebe wrote: 11 Sep 2020, 10:46
DrDuke wrote: 11 Sep 2020, 10:42

You act like you've only seen Adamek's fights against Molina and Miller.
Wow you deduced all that. Wrong again Dukie.
"Whatever" (c)
Dukie my boy. I thought you said that using that term indicated a person lost an argument. :yay:
Post Reply