Vitali vs ....
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39242
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Vitali vs ....
Oliver McCall
James Smith
James Smith
Re: Vitali vs ....
Vitali UD 12 (117-111) McCall
Vitali UD 12 ( 116-112) Smith
Vitali UD 12 ( 116-112) Smith
Re: Vitali vs ....
McCall would be outboxed to a wide decision.
Bonecrusher could make it a fight, but still Klitschko would edge there.
Bonecrusher could make it a fight, but still Klitschko would edge there.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15678
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Vitali vs ....
Is Vitali Klitschko versus two goofy-goofy guys. I don't know how did those two became champions.
Re: Vitali vs ....
Both had unmotivated opponents, when became champions. However, Bonecrusher was much better than McCall.elmersalsa wrote: ↑08 Sep 2020, 10:29 Is Vitali Klitschko versus two goofy-goofy guys. I don't know how did those two became champions.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Vitali vs ....
Not sure what made bone crusher much better than McCall, but I'd take vit to outpoint both.
Re: Vitali vs ....
Bonecrusher was tougher and sharper as fighter, what made him a more dangerous opponent.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Vitali vs ....
Re: Vitali vs ....
You probably don't get it. He was tougher as a fighter, not in terms of chin. I mean, he could bring it anytime.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑09 Sep 2020, 10:21Tougher?![]()
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Vitali vs ....
Yeah, my mistake.DrDuke wrote: ↑09 Sep 2020, 10:29You probably don't get it. He was tougher as a fighter, not in terms of chin. I mean, he could bring it anytime.
Re: Vitali vs ....
Vitali by UD in both fights.
Re: Vitali vs ....
Vitali wins both.....and in the case of McCall who blew so hot and cold, a stoppage is not out of the question.
I also think Smith makes a far better fist of it....he was a big, organised powerful (if limited) HW, unlikely to be bullied and he travelled well. He came over to London and definitely dealt with Bruno's power, a hostile atmosphere and won big late in the day....he also reversed an earlier bad result against 'Spoon.
I also think Smith makes a far better fist of it....he was a big, organised powerful (if limited) HW, unlikely to be bullied and he travelled well. He came over to London and definitely dealt with Bruno's power, a hostile atmosphere and won big late in the day....he also reversed an earlier bad result against 'Spoon.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Vitali vs ....
McCall didn't blow hot and cold taking punches. Vitali couldn't hurt him with a bat.
Re: Vitali vs ....
Klitschko could outbox McCall easy.
Oliver didn't have those skills.
Oliver didn't have those skills.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Vitali vs ....
In terms of achievements - yes, but some of Vitali's opponents could handle McCall. It would be no surprise, if the likes of Peter, Adamek or Chisora did that.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Vitali vs ....
DrDuke wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 09:33In terms of achievements - yes, but some of Vitali's opponents could handle McCall. It would be no surprise, if the likes of Peter, Adamek or Chisora did that.
Re: Vitali vs ....
It would be more surprizing, if idiOTO answered something more than just his favorite emoji. 
Re: Vitali vs ....
Adamek??!!!
Re: Vitali vs ....
Wow you deduced all that. Wrong again Dukie.
Re: Vitali vs ....
Dukie my boy. I thought you said that using that term indicated a person lost an argument.