Page 1 of 2
Vitali vs ....
Posted: 07 Sep 2020, 19:23
by margaret thatcher
Oliver McCall
James Smith
Re: Vitali vs ....
Posted: 08 Sep 2020, 02:16
by Woldemar
Vitali UD 12 (117-111) McCall
Vitali UD 12 ( 116-112) Smith
Re: Vitali vs ....
Posted: 08 Sep 2020, 06:27
by DrDuke
McCall would be outboxed to a wide decision.
Bonecrusher could make it a fight, but still Klitschko would edge there.
Re: Vitali vs ....
Posted: 08 Sep 2020, 10:29
by elmersalsa
Is Vitali Klitschko versus two goofy-goofy guys. I don't know how did those two became champions.
Re: Vitali vs ....
Posted: 08 Sep 2020, 10:32
by DrDuke
elmersalsa wrote: ↑08 Sep 2020, 10:29
Is Vitali Klitschko versus two goofy-goofy guys. I don't know how did those two became champions.
Both had unmotivated opponents, when became champions. However, Bonecrusher was much better than McCall.
Re: Vitali vs ....
Posted: 08 Sep 2020, 23:44
by Onetimeonly
Not sure what made bone crusher much better than McCall, but I'd take vit to outpoint both.
Re: Vitali vs ....
Posted: 09 Sep 2020, 05:28
by DrDuke
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑08 Sep 2020, 23:44
Not sure what made bone crusher much better than McCall
Bonecrusher was tougher and sharper as fighter, what made him a more dangerous opponent.
Re: Vitali vs ....
Posted: 09 Sep 2020, 10:21
by Onetimeonly
DrDuke wrote: ↑09 Sep 2020, 05:28
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑08 Sep 2020, 23:44
Not sure what made bone crusher much better than McCall
Bonecrusher was tougher and sharper as fighter, what made him a more dangerous opponent.
Tougher?

Re: Vitali vs ....
Posted: 09 Sep 2020, 10:29
by DrDuke
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑09 Sep 2020, 10:21
DrDuke wrote: ↑09 Sep 2020, 05:28
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑08 Sep 2020, 23:44
Not sure what made bone crusher much better than McCall
Bonecrusher was tougher and sharper as fighter, what made him a more dangerous opponent.
Tougher?
You probably don't get it. He was tougher as a fighter, not in terms of chin. I mean, he could bring it anytime.
Re: Vitali vs ....
Posted: 09 Sep 2020, 10:43
by Onetimeonly
DrDuke wrote: ↑09 Sep 2020, 10:29
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑09 Sep 2020, 10:21
DrDuke wrote: ↑09 Sep 2020, 05:28
Bonecrusher was tougher and sharper as fighter, what made him a more dangerous opponent.
Tougher?
You probably don't get it. He was tougher as a fighter, not in terms of chin. I mean, he could bring it anytime.
Yeah, my mistake.

Re: Vitali vs ....
Posted: 09 Sep 2020, 11:46
by gilgamesh
Vitali by UD in both fights.
Re: Vitali vs ....
Posted: 09 Sep 2020, 13:48
by Bodyshot3
Vitali wins both.....and in the case of McCall who blew so hot and cold, a stoppage is not out of the question.
I also think Smith makes a far better fist of it....he was a big, organised powerful (if limited) HW, unlikely to be bullied and he travelled well. He came over to London and definitely dealt with Bruno's power, a hostile atmosphere and won big late in the day....he also reversed an earlier bad result against 'Spoon.
Re: Vitali vs ....
Posted: 10 Sep 2020, 21:03
by Onetimeonly
McCall didn't blow hot and cold taking punches. Vitali couldn't hurt him with a bat.
Re: Vitali vs ....
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 05:06
by Evander
Klitschko could outbox McCall easy.
Oliver didn't have those skills.
Re: Vitali vs ....
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 08:24
by Onetimeonly
Evander wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 05:06
Klitschko could outbox McCall easy.
Oliver didn't have those skills.
He'd be the best vitali ever beat.
Re: Vitali vs ....
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 09:33
by DrDuke
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 08:24
Evander wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 05:06
Klitschko could outbox McCall easy.
Oliver didn't have those skills.
He'd be the best vitali ever beat.
In terms of achievements - yes, but some of Vitali's opponents could handle McCall. It would be no surprise, if the likes of Peter, Adamek or Chisora did that.
Re: Vitali vs ....
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 09:53
by Onetimeonly
DrDuke wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 09:33
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 08:24
Evander wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 05:06
Klitschko could outbox McCall easy.
Oliver didn't have those skills.
He'd be the best vitali ever beat.
In terms of achievements - yes, but some of Vitali's opponents could handle McCall. It would be no surprise, if the likes of Peter, Adamek or Chisora did that.

Re: Vitali vs ....
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 10:06
by DrDuke
It would be more surprizing, if idiOTO answered something more than just his favorite emoji.

Re: Vitali vs ....
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 10:27
by oogiebe
Adamek??!!!
Re: Vitali vs ....
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 10:32
by DrDuke
oogiebe wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 10:27Adamek??!!!
And why not? At his best he was a technically solid boxer with decent skillset.
Re: Vitali vs ....
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 10:38
by oogiebe
DrDuke wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 10:32
oogiebe wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 10:27Adamek??!!!
And why not? At his best he was a technically solid boxer with decent skillset.

Re: Vitali vs ....
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 10:42
by DrDuke
oogiebe wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 10:38
DrDuke wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 10:32
oogiebe wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 10:27Adamek??!!!
And why not? At his best he was a technically solid boxer with decent skillset.
You act like you've only seen Adamek's fights against Molina and Miller.
Re: Vitali vs ....
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 10:46
by oogiebe
DrDuke wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 10:42
oogiebe wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 10:38
DrDuke wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 10:32
And why not? At his best he was a technically solid boxer with decent skillset.
You act like you've only seen Adamek's fights against Molina and Miller.
Wow you deduced all that. Wrong again Dukie.
Re: Vitali vs ....
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 10:48
by DrDuke
oogiebe wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 10:46
DrDuke wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 10:42
You act like you've only seen Adamek's fights against Molina and Miller.
Wow you deduced all that. Wrong again Dukie.
"Whatever" (c)
Re: Vitali vs ....
Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 11:08
by oogiebe
DrDuke wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 10:48
oogiebe wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 10:46
DrDuke wrote: ↑11 Sep 2020, 10:42
You act like you've only seen Adamek's fights against Molina and Miller.
Wow you deduced all that. Wrong again Dukie.
"Whatever" (c)
Dukie my boy. I thought you said that using that term indicated a person lost an argument.
