Loma obviously was a one of the top pound-for-pound fighters and by many opinions he was #1. So, his loss gotta cause some significant shifts.
You're welcome to post your lists here.
Mine one:
1. Crawford
2. Canelo
3. Lopez
4. Inoue
5. Fury
6. Usyk
7. Lomachenko
8. Golovkin
9. Spence
10. Pacquiao
Pound-for-pound ratings after the loss of Lomachenko
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Pound-for-pound ratings after the loss of Lomachenko
No change in my top 3, after 5 it could change by the hour anyway.
Crawford
Inoue
Spence
Canelo
Lopez
Loma
GGG
Estrada
Berchelt
Shiro
Crawford
Inoue
Spence
Canelo
Lopez
Loma
GGG
Estrada
Berchelt
Shiro
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 101164
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Pound-for-pound ratings after the loss of Lomachenko
Yeh, I don’t think you can put Lopez into the top 3.. not just yet..
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Pound-for-pound ratings after the loss of Lomachenko
You could, especially if you were one of the loma is god folks. I've just had bud #1 for more years than I can remember. Teo showed even more skill than I thought he had.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 05:29 Yeh, I don’t think you can put Lopez into the top 3.. not just yet..
This Lopez, Haney, loma, berchelt, Valdez, Stevenson, Conley, tank, LSC, mix could be awesome.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 101164
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Pound-for-pound ratings after the loss of Lomachenko
Let’s hope we get a few of those mixes..Onetimeonly wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 05:35You could, especially if you were one of the loma is god folks. I've just had bud #1 for more years than I can remember. Teo showed even more skill than I thought he had.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 05:29 Yeh, I don’t think you can put Lopez into the top 3.. not just yet..
This Lopez, Haney, loma, berchelt, Valdez, Stevenson, Conley, tank, LSC, mix could be awesome.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Pound-for-pound ratings after the loss of Lomachenko
No doubt, I feel lucky we got this one.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 05:36Let’s hope we get a few of those mixes..Onetimeonly wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 05:35You could, especially if you were one of the loma is god folks. I've just had bud #1 for more years than I can remember. Teo showed even more skill than I thought he had.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 05:29 Yeh, I don’t think you can put Lopez into the top 3.. not just yet..
This Lopez, Haney, loma, berchelt, Valdez, Stevenson, Conley, tank, LSC, mix could be awesome.
Re: Pound-for-pound ratings after the loss of Lomachenko
Canelo, Crawford, Inoue my top 3.
-
Boxing Prospect
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Pound-for-pound ratings after the loss of Lomachenko
Following on from Srisaket beating Gonzalez, and then being usurped himself by Etsrada, I think you're right. Most don't even seem to have Estrada in their top 10s...Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 05:29 Yeh, I don’t think you can put Lopez into the top 3.. not just yet..
Re: Pound-for-pound ratings after the loss of Lomachenko
I still have loma above lopez in my rankings. Lopez certainly deserved the win, but I still think loma is the better fighter. He just fought an unexplicably stupid fight. My top 5:
1. Crawford
2. Canelo
3. Inoue
4. Fury
5. Loma
6. Usyk
7. Manny
8. Beterbiev
9. Spence
10. Lopez/Haney.
1. Crawford
2. Canelo
3. Inoue
4. Fury
5. Loma
6. Usyk
7. Manny
8. Beterbiev
9. Spence
10. Lopez/Haney.
-
world ranked
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2199
- Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21
Re: Pound-for-pound ratings after the loss of Lomachenko
1. Canelo
2. Inoue
3. Fury
4.Usyk
5. Spence
6.Crawford
7. Pacquaio
8. Lopez
9. Charlo
10. GGG/Estrada
2. Inoue
3. Fury
4.Usyk
5. Spence
6.Crawford
7. Pacquaio
8. Lopez
9. Charlo
10. GGG/Estrada