Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 103167
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »



margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39338
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by margaret thatcher »

wow, wlad is shook :oo
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 103167
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

margaret thatcher wrote: 31 Oct 2020, 20:30 wow, wlad is shook :oo
There are some backing him, but the English folk are saying that’s too far. He’s been through a lot etc.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39338
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by margaret thatcher »

well it certainly seems like wlad (is it wlad or vitali or both on that account) got very sensitive about it

fact is though, fury will always have that w over him , ass whooping or not (it wasnt)
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 103167
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

margaret thatcher wrote: 31 Oct 2020, 20:33 well it certainly seems like wlad (is it wlad or vitali or both on that account) got very sensitive about it

fact is though, fury will always have that w over him , ass whooping or not (it wasnt)
He did get out of the rematch..

It’s Wlad’s account that one.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46961
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by gilgamesh »

He avoided the rematch, but Wlad doesn't really have any room to complain considering he had 12 rounds to try to defend his title, and didn't do a goddamn thing.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13416
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by jameswilson »

Is that Wales actual twitter handle? Or some twat pretending to be him?
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by Cyclops »

margaret thatcher wrote: 31 Oct 2020, 20:30 wow, wlad is shook :oo
Shook, triggered and oh so salty.

I remember Wlad suddenly turning evil in that Gloves are Off with Haye when Haye slagged off Vitali. He obviously loves his brother and the Fury loss probably still embarrasses him. Wlad's a bit of a bully and doesn't like it up him. At the end of the day, IF Fury beats AJ he'll have beaten Wladamir Klitschko, Deontay Wilder and Anthony Joshua.

People should remember he played patty cake with Ibragamov for 12 rounds, only KO'd tiny fat Eddie Chambers in the 12th because Emmanuel basically told him he was pussy in the corner and his best win was a cruiserweight from England with a sore toe.

Should we forget his platform shoes, spongy ring and mystical USB prediction? Or that he 'redeemed' himself from being outboxed by Fury by getting sparked out by Anthony Joshua, where he finally got a bit of credit for having a fight for a change? Or that he never rematched a fat golfer who flatlined him and got his brother to do it for him instead?
ash.123
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 164
Joined: 02 Oct 2020, 12:17

Re: Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by ash.123 »

Should stick to sucking up to his ‘little brother’ AJ.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by Autobarn »

Cyclops wrote: 31 Oct 2020, 23:26
margaret thatcher wrote: 31 Oct 2020, 20:30 wow, wlad is shook :oo
Shook, triggered and oh so salty.

I remember Wlad suddenly turning evil in that Gloves are Off with Haye when Haye slagged off Vitali. He obviously loves his brother and the Fury loss probably still embarrasses him. Wlad's a bit of a bully and doesn't like it up him. At the end of the day, IF Fury beats AJ he'll have beaten Wladamir Klitschko, Deontay Wilder and Anthony Joshua.

People should remember he played patty cake with Ibragamov for 12 rounds, only KO'd tiny fat Eddie Chambers in the 12th because Emmanuel basically told him he was pussy in the corner and his best win was a cruiserweight from England with a sore toe.

Should we forget his platform shoes, spongy ring and mystical USB prediction? Or that he 'redeemed' himself from being outboxed by Fury by getting sparked out by Anthony Joshua, where he finally got a bit of credit for having a fight for a change? Or that he never rematched a fat golfer who flatlined him and got his brother to do it for him instead?
Agreed withmost of this.

Wlad v Ibraginov was utterly unwatchable. So we’re the other two key wins, Povetkin and Haye.

He did get a lot of credit v Joshua, picking a couple of great shots, but nonetheless spent the majority of that fight throwing feints.
Steveh583
Super Featherweight
Posts: 4377
Joined: 24 Nov 2018, 06:06

Re: Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by Steveh583 »

wlad never took that defeat well :lol: :lol: :lol: it will haunt him til the day he dies
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13879
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by DrDuke »

The Gypsy King would have outclassed the older Klitschko as well.
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4572
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by JC »

DrDuke wrote: 01 Nov 2020, 07:19 The Gypsy King would have outclassed the older Klitschko as well.
Did he outclass Wlad, though?

He won a clear decision by edging a lot of rounds and, from memory, got hurt/buzzed at least once in the later rounds. Great victory but it’s not like he toyed with him.

Fury/Vitali is an interesting one to think about, though it would be ugly as hell.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13879
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by DrDuke »

J-C wrote: 01 Nov 2020, 08:36
DrDuke wrote: 01 Nov 2020, 07:19 The Gypsy King would have outclassed the older Klitschko as well.
Did he outclass Wlad, though?

He won a clear decision by edging a lot of rounds and, from memory, got hurt/buzzed at least once in the later rounds. Great victory but it’s not like he toyed with him.

Fury/Vitali is an interesting one to think about, though it would be ugly as hell.
I'd say, he did toy with him, just didn't force anything. There was no big damage delivered, but Fury was taking round after round and he was indeed caught only once, late in the fight.
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by Cyclops »

J-C wrote: 01 Nov 2020, 08:36
DrDuke wrote: 01 Nov 2020, 07:19 The Gypsy King would have outclassed the older Klitschko as well.
Did he outclass Wlad, though?

He won a clear decision by edging a lot of rounds and, from memory, got hurt/buzzed at least once in the later rounds. Great victory but it’s not like he toyed with him.

Fury/Vitali is an interesting one to think about, though it would be ugly as hell.
It's never going to happen so it's all conjecture anyway. All boxers pull out of fights because they're injured: Fury pulled out of the rematch with Wlad because his head was wrecked and it took years for him to get it back together. I too haven't watched the fight very much and certainly not for a long time and my main memory is of Wlad turning around and walking away from Fury while still getting punched. It's not often you see that in a fight. So yeah, there were definitely moments where he toyed with Wladamir.

Define 'outclassed' anyway.

Considering we're locked down again and they're supposedly going to shut the gyms, and it seems to be raining endlessly in the UK, I'll definitely end up rewatching it.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32940
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Cyclops wrote: 01 Nov 2020, 09:29
J-C wrote: 01 Nov 2020, 08:36
DrDuke wrote: 01 Nov 2020, 07:19 The Gypsy King would have outclassed the older Klitschko as well.
Did he outclass Wlad, though?

He won a clear decision by edging a lot of rounds and, from memory, got hurt/buzzed at least once in the later rounds. Great victory but it’s not like he toyed with him.

Fury/Vitali is an interesting one to think about, though it would be ugly as hell.
It's never going to happen so it's all conjecture anyway. All boxers pull out of fights because they're injured: Fury pulled out of the rematch with Wlad because his head was wrecked and it took years for him to get it back together. I too haven't watched the fight very much and certainly not for a long time and my main memory is of Wlad turning around and walking away from Fury while still getting punched. It's not often you see that in a fight. So yeah, there were definitely moments where he toyed with Wladamir.

Define 'outclassed' anyway.

Considering we're locked down again and they're supposedly going to shut the gyms, and it seems to be raining endlessly in the UK, I'll definitely end up rewatching it.
Good man, take one for the team and report back on your findings, I’ve never managed to find the motivation to watch it again and doubt I ever will.
coghaugen11
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2595
Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 11:59

Re: Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by coghaugen11 »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 31 Oct 2020, 20:31
margaret thatcher wrote: 31 Oct 2020, 20:30 wow, wlad is shook :oo
There are some backing him, but the English folk are saying that’s too far. He’s been through a lot etc.
Cry me a river. He just got lazy.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27508
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by stujones »

Wlad vs Fury is a fight that seems to have been faded / erased from memory - it was really close. Sky gave him the fight by rediculously giving him the last round (had it level). I know you shouldn't score a fight this way - but in the "old school" - take the championship from the champion style of judging - then I'm not sure if Tyson did enough.

Either way it was very close - but it has since become a "schooling" and now a "kick arse"..... Tyson kicked Wilder's arse in the rematch and gave him a schooling in fight 1 - but he didn't do either vs Wlad..... Wlad for some reason couldn't pull the trigger and Fury didn't do much trigger pulling either.
Delta Jay
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1915
Joined: 26 Jun 2013, 15:19

Re: Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by Delta Jay »

This thread has made me wish Wilder fought Vitali
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by JimJim2009 »

I love how Tyson gets under their skin so much :lol: He has absolutely done in Deontay with his antics, which I think have done more lasting damage than the physical beating he endured. Looks like Wlad still can't get over it either. Well done Tyson, keep winding them up :TU:
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 103167
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Fury mostly won because Wlad did nothing.

But that was kind of due to Fury’s style. Just unpredictable.
knockout
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3868
Joined: 11 Jun 2003, 10:00

Re: Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by knockout »

1) Wlad has worked hard on cultivating his “gentleman” image .. but as others have said he is an on top fighter with a huge ego, who stacked all the odds in his favour at every opportunity.

2) I don’t think it’s necessary to defend Tyson Fury if someone calls him out on social media ... Fury probably doesn’t care .. it’s all part of the game - a game that Fury is very good at using it to his advantage !
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4572
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by JC »

Cyclops wrote: 01 Nov 2020, 09:29
J-C wrote: 01 Nov 2020, 08:36
DrDuke wrote: 01 Nov 2020, 07:19 The Gypsy King would have outclassed the older Klitschko as well.
Did he outclass Wlad, though?

He won a clear decision by edging a lot of rounds and, from memory, got hurt/buzzed at least once in the later rounds. Great victory but it’s not like he toyed with him.

Fury/Vitali is an interesting one to think about, though it would be ugly as hell.
It's never going to happen so it's all conjecture anyway. All boxers pull out of fights because they're injured: Fury pulled out of the rematch with Wlad because his head was wrecked and it took years for him to get it back together. I too haven't watched the fight very much and certainly not for a long time and my main memory is of Wlad turning around and walking away from Fury while still getting punched. It's not often you see that in a fight. So yeah, there were definitely moments where he toyed with Wladamir.

Define 'outclassed' anyway.
My definition of outclassed in boxing would be a fight where it's clear one boxer's abilities are on a totally different level to the other's. My memory of the fight is more that Fury got his tactics spot on and fought a brave and disciplined fight.

The fact that most of us were expecting Wlad to do the 'outclassing' may have coloured how the fight is remembered.

I take nothing away from Fury though, and rate his win over Wlad as better than AJ's.
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by JimJim2009 »

knockout wrote: 01 Nov 2020, 10:12 1) Wlad has worked hard on cultivating his “gentleman” image .. but as others have said he is an on top fighter with a huge ego, who stacked all the odds in his favour at every opportunity.

2) I don’t think it’s necessary to defend Tyson Fury if someone calls him out on social media ... Fury probably doesn’t care .. it’s all part of the game - a game that Fury is very good at using it to his advantage !
Spot on mate. He sought to load the deck in his favour in all ways possible.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13879
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Has Wlad hit Fury below the belt?

Post by DrDuke »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 01 Nov 2020, 10:09 Fury mostly won because Wlad did nothing.

But that was kind of due to Fury’s style. Just unpredictable.
Exactly.
Post Reply