After 6 weeks of action. I think this is about the way it shakes down.
1. Willie Pep
2. Abe Attell
3. Jem Driscoll
4. Sugar Ramos
5. Azumah Nelson
6. Eder Jofre
7. Vicente Saldivar
8. Terry McGovern
9. Alexis Arguello
10. Erik Morales
11. Eusibio Pedroza
12. Johnny Kilbane
13. Salvador Sanchez
14. Henry Armstrong
15. Sandy Saddler
16. Freddie Miller
17. Naseem Hamed
18. Bobby Chacon
19. Kid Chocolate
20. Juan Manuel Marquez
Notable CPU opponents (Fringe Contenders)
Ruben Olivares (Fought Kilbane to a Draw)
Orlando Salido (Upset Freddie Miller)
Jhonny Gonzalez (Held Sugar Ramos to 2 narrow decisions)
Steve Robinson (upset Juan Manuel Marquez via TKO)
Dick Hollywood (fought Saddler to a Draw)
Bernard Dunne (upset Terry McGovern)
Injin Chi (upset Johnny Kilbane)
Benny Bass (held Driscoll to an SD, and upset Armstrong advancing to a Title fight)
George Dixon (fought Saddler to a Draw in a Title Eliminator)
Credible Rankings: By Gilgamesh
Re: Credible Rankings: By Gilgamesh
I think these rankings are reasonable for now. Obviously the picture will become increasingly clear as the season goes on, and the top guys separate themselves more and more.
Re: Credible Rankings: By Gilgamesh
The algorythyms you are using are woefully transparent, as they are clearly loaded with bias, opinion, bile and jabberwocky.
In what universe does Goldenbuzz Productions have anything to do with the likes of a 2nd best...or the 2nd worst fighter within the this competitive environment?
We are no fringe organization.......and you do not appear to be a particularly promising prognosticator of pugilistic prowess.
In what universe does Goldenbuzz Productions have anything to do with the likes of a 2nd best...or the 2nd worst fighter within the this competitive environment?
We are no fringe organization.......and you do not appear to be a particularly promising prognosticator of pugilistic prowess.
Re: Credible Rankings: By Gilgamesh
My rankings are strictly on the up and up sir. They're not based on the potential the fighters may or may not have. They're based on results.BoxBuzz wrote: ↑08 Apr 2021, 13:56 The algorythyms you are using are woefully transparent, as they are clearly loaded with bias, opinion, bile and jabberwocky.
In what universe does Goldenbuzz Productions have anything to do with the likes of a 2nd best...or the 2nd worst fighter within the this competitive environment?
We are no fringe organization.......and you do not appear to be a particularly promising prognosticator of pugilistic prowess.
Re: Credible Rankings: By Gilgamesh
Updated after Week 4
Re: Credible Rankings: By Gilgamesh
Moving each of my fighters up by 1 in the ratings, IS a good start to greater credibility!
-
NoScoutingReports
- Lightweight
- Posts: 3238
- Joined: 21 Jan 2018, 16:28
Re: Credible Rankings: By Gilgamesh
Update required GILGA, JMM to rock bottom please sir!
Re: Credible Rankings: By Gilgamesh
I'll update it sometime within the next day or so.
Re: Credible Rankings: By Gilgamesh
Updated to reflect the rankings through Week 6