Page 1 of 1
Womens Boxing - The weight divisions
Posted: 09 Apr 2021, 06:02
by rhino222
Surely, Womens boxing needs to have a more condensed list of weight divisions.
With 2 minute rounds meaning less KOs and with a large pair of breasts meaning you have to fight 2 weight divisions above your body size (Im not on about Bridges silicone)......plus the smaller pool of fighters. It makes more sense to me to have blah blah lightweight, welterweight, middleweight etc etc.
Thoughts?
Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions
Posted: 09 Apr 2021, 16:39
by Alba
Woman's boxing is really in its infancy compared to the mens game, I don't see why they should have less weigh divisions
Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions
Posted: 09 Apr 2021, 17:26
by gilgamesh
They don't. They have 1 more. They have Atomweight.
Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions
Posted: 12 Apr 2021, 14:31
by rhino222
There just arnt enough fighters to justify all of the weight divisions. Win 4 fights and you are up for a world title. Its just not right. Either less weight divisions or less governing bodies, stop feeding these bastards sanctioning fees in the womens game.
Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions
Posted: 12 Apr 2021, 16:08
by margaret thatcher
ebanie bridges couldnt even win a fight at the aus am nationals, but after 5 pro fights is on to world titles
Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions
Posted: 12 Apr 2021, 16:10
by JamesPhilips
gilgamesh wrote: ↑09 Apr 2021, 17:26
They don't. They have 1 more. They have Atomweight.
Will women have Bridgerweight?
On a serious note if this list is correct some weight classes are omitted for women, thought as you say they have Atomweight though they can't decide on one name.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_c ... _champions
Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions
Posted: 12 Apr 2021, 16:16
by margaret thatcher
Alba wrote: ↑09 Apr 2021, 16:39
Woman's boxing is really in its infancy compared to the mens game, I don't see why they should have less weigh divisions
with the lack of female boxers having as many divisions as they do spreads them too thin, we just saw 5-0 vs 6-1 for a world title, and you have divisions with literally 15 people in them globally
or would that be sexist
Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions
Posted: 12 Apr 2021, 16:48
by gilgamesh
margaret thatcher wrote: ↑12 Apr 2021, 16:16
Alba wrote: ↑09 Apr 2021, 16:39
Woman's boxing is really in its infancy compared to the mens game, I don't see why they should have less weigh divisions
with the lack of female boxers having as many divisions as they do spreads them too thin, we just saw 5-0 vs 6-1 for a world title, and you have divisions with literally 15 people in them globally
or would that be sexist
I'll tell ya what's sexist, but also true. There's never been a Heavyweight Female Boxing star, and never will be. Ya wanna know why? Because the only way a Female athlete in any sport pretty much ever gets popular is if she can be sold as a sex symbol. A Big Heavyweight Woman can't and won't be sold as a sex symbol in our lifetime, therefore she could only ever have a very minor audience at best.
Many of 'em in any weight class aren't exactly "Hot" but you notice that their publicity photos still try to make 'em look sexy as opposed to tough, because that's what sells.
Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions
Posted: 12 Apr 2021, 17:00
by JamesPhilips
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Apr 2021, 16:48
margaret thatcher wrote: ↑12 Apr 2021, 16:16
Alba wrote: ↑09 Apr 2021, 16:39
Woman's boxing is really in its infancy compared to the mens game, I don't see why they should have less weigh divisions
with the lack of female boxers having as many divisions as they do spreads them too thin, we just saw 5-0 vs 6-1 for a world title, and you have divisions with literally 15 people in them globally
or would that be sexist
I'll tell ya what's sexist, but also true. There's never been a Heavyweight Female Boxing star, and never will be. Ya wanna know why? Because the only way a Female athlete in any sport pretty much ever gets popular is if she can be sold as a sex symbol. A Big Heavyweight Woman can't and won't be sold as a sex symbol in our lifetime, therefore she could only ever have a very minor audience at best.
Many of 'em in any weight class aren't exactly "Hot" but you notice that their publicity photos still try to make 'em look sexy as opposed to tough, because that's what sells.
Sex sells as Tyan Booth reminds us. Good point though.
Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions
Posted: 12 Apr 2021, 17:03
by gilgamesh
JamesPhilips wrote: ↑12 Apr 2021, 17:00
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Apr 2021, 16:48
margaret thatcher wrote: ↑12 Apr 2021, 16:16
with the lack of female boxers having as many divisions as they do spreads them too thin, we just saw 5-0 vs 6-1 for a world title, and you have divisions with literally 15 people in them globally
or would that be sexist
I'll tell ya what's sexist, but also true. There's never been a Heavyweight Female Boxing star, and never will be. Ya wanna know why? Because the only way a Female athlete in any sport pretty much ever gets popular is if she can be sold as a sex symbol. A Big Heavyweight Woman can't and won't be sold as a sex symbol in our lifetime, therefore she could only ever have a very minor audience at best.
Many of 'em in any weight class aren't exactly "Hot" but you notice that their publicity photos still try to make 'em look sexy as opposed to tough, because that's what sells.
Sex sells as Tyan Booth reminds us. Good point though.
You don't necessarily have to be attractive as a man. You can just be good. I've never seen it really workout yet for a Female athlete.
Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions
Posted: 12 Apr 2021, 17:10
by JamesPhilips
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Apr 2021, 17:03
JamesPhilips wrote: ↑12 Apr 2021, 17:00
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Apr 2021, 16:48
I'll tell ya what's sexist, but also true. There's never been a Heavyweight Female Boxing star, and never will be. Ya wanna know why? Because the only way a Female athlete in any sport pretty much ever gets popular is if she can be sold as a sex symbol. A Big Heavyweight Woman can't and won't be sold as a sex symbol in our lifetime, therefore she could only ever have a very minor audience at best.
Many of 'em in any weight class aren't exactly "Hot" but you notice that their publicity photos still try to make 'em look sexy as opposed to tough, because that's what sells.
Sex sells as Tyan Booth reminds us. Good point though.
You don't necessarily have to be attractive as a man. You can just be good. I've never seen it really workout yet for a Female athlete.
It's definitely a different culture women's sport and being attractive as a woman makes a big difference to your pay / sponsorships. But in women's Tennis there are plenty of unattractive women who are very respected. Navratilova. Graf. Williams.
Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions
Posted: 12 Apr 2021, 17:32
by Coco
While sex sells, the Aussie would never get invited back if she folded easily.
After her gutsy but limited performance I def reckon she will get a few shots back on Matchroom shows
Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions
Posted: 12 Apr 2021, 19:49
by margaret thatcher
couldnt manage a win at the aussie ams, but will prob be a multi time world challenger in under 10 fights lol. that's women's pro boxing for you
Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions
Posted: 13 Apr 2021, 06:45
by stujones
Both Bridges and Courtenay are a million times better than some of Christy Martin's opponents who fought for world titles.
It will develop organically, leave it as it is I think.
Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions
Posted: 13 Apr 2021, 07:57
by mickey1975
Imagine telling a woman you think she should move down in weight.
Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions
Posted: 13 Apr 2021, 13:39
by margaret thatcher
stujones wrote: ↑13 Apr 2021, 06:45
Both Bridges and Courtenay are a million times better than some of Christy Martin's opponents who fought for world titles.
It will develop organically, leave it as it is I think.
in all of christy's fights she only fought 3 for world titles and lost 2 of them i think
bridges fighting for a title after 5-0.....she's like a female loma
Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions
Posted: 13 Apr 2021, 13:42
by stujones
Were they not for titles? But generally she was considered....before rijker was on the scene, to be the best female boxer and some of her opponents were shocking
Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions
Posted: 13 Apr 2021, 13:44
by margaret thatcher
no most of them werent , she didnt win a title until almost the end of her career