Womens Boxing - The weight divisions

Post Reply
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6616
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Womens Boxing - The weight divisions

Post by rhino222 »

Surely, Womens boxing needs to have a more condensed list of weight divisions.

With 2 minute rounds meaning less KOs and with a large pair of breasts meaning you have to fight 2 weight divisions above your body size (Im not on about Bridges silicone)......plus the smaller pool of fighters. It makes more sense to me to have blah blah lightweight, welterweight, middleweight etc etc.

Thoughts?
Alba
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1944
Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 16:05

Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions

Post by Alba »

Woman's boxing is really in its infancy compared to the mens game, I don't see why they should have less weigh divisions
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46954
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions

Post by gilgamesh »

They don't. They have 1 more. They have Atomweight.
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6616
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions

Post by rhino222 »

There just arnt enough fighters to justify all of the weight divisions. Win 4 fights and you are up for a world title. Its just not right. Either less weight divisions or less governing bodies, stop feeding these bastards sanctioning fees in the womens game.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39337
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions

Post by margaret thatcher »

ebanie bridges couldnt even win a fight at the aus am nationals, but after 5 pro fights is on to world titles :yay:
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6568
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions

Post by JamesPhilips »

gilgamesh wrote: 09 Apr 2021, 17:26 They don't. They have 1 more. They have Atomweight.
Will women have Bridgerweight?
On a serious note if this list is correct some weight classes are omitted for women, thought as you say they have Atomweight though they can't decide on one name.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_c ... _champions
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39337
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions

Post by margaret thatcher »

Alba wrote: 09 Apr 2021, 16:39 Woman's boxing is really in its infancy compared to the mens game, I don't see why they should have less weigh divisions
with the lack of female boxers having as many divisions as they do spreads them too thin, we just saw 5-0 vs 6-1 for a world title, and you have divisions with literally 15 people in them globally

or would that be sexist
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46954
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions

Post by gilgamesh »

margaret thatcher wrote: 12 Apr 2021, 16:16
Alba wrote: 09 Apr 2021, 16:39 Woman's boxing is really in its infancy compared to the mens game, I don't see why they should have less weigh divisions
with the lack of female boxers having as many divisions as they do spreads them too thin, we just saw 5-0 vs 6-1 for a world title, and you have divisions with literally 15 people in them globally

or would that be sexist
I'll tell ya what's sexist, but also true. There's never been a Heavyweight Female Boxing star, and never will be. Ya wanna know why? Because the only way a Female athlete in any sport pretty much ever gets popular is if she can be sold as a sex symbol. A Big Heavyweight Woman can't and won't be sold as a sex symbol in our lifetime, therefore she could only ever have a very minor audience at best.

Many of 'em in any weight class aren't exactly "Hot" but you notice that their publicity photos still try to make 'em look sexy as opposed to tough, because that's what sells.
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6568
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions

Post by JamesPhilips »

gilgamesh wrote: 12 Apr 2021, 16:48
margaret thatcher wrote: 12 Apr 2021, 16:16
Alba wrote: 09 Apr 2021, 16:39 Woman's boxing is really in its infancy compared to the mens game, I don't see why they should have less weigh divisions
with the lack of female boxers having as many divisions as they do spreads them too thin, we just saw 5-0 vs 6-1 for a world title, and you have divisions with literally 15 people in them globally

or would that be sexist
I'll tell ya what's sexist, but also true. There's never been a Heavyweight Female Boxing star, and never will be. Ya wanna know why? Because the only way a Female athlete in any sport pretty much ever gets popular is if she can be sold as a sex symbol. A Big Heavyweight Woman can't and won't be sold as a sex symbol in our lifetime, therefore she could only ever have a very minor audience at best.

Many of 'em in any weight class aren't exactly "Hot" but you notice that their publicity photos still try to make 'em look sexy as opposed to tough, because that's what sells.
Sex sells as Tyan Booth reminds us. Good point though.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46954
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions

Post by gilgamesh »

JamesPhilips wrote: 12 Apr 2021, 17:00
gilgamesh wrote: 12 Apr 2021, 16:48
margaret thatcher wrote: 12 Apr 2021, 16:16

with the lack of female boxers having as many divisions as they do spreads them too thin, we just saw 5-0 vs 6-1 for a world title, and you have divisions with literally 15 people in them globally

or would that be sexist
I'll tell ya what's sexist, but also true. There's never been a Heavyweight Female Boxing star, and never will be. Ya wanna know why? Because the only way a Female athlete in any sport pretty much ever gets popular is if she can be sold as a sex symbol. A Big Heavyweight Woman can't and won't be sold as a sex symbol in our lifetime, therefore she could only ever have a very minor audience at best.

Many of 'em in any weight class aren't exactly "Hot" but you notice that their publicity photos still try to make 'em look sexy as opposed to tough, because that's what sells.
Sex sells as Tyan Booth reminds us. Good point though.
You don't necessarily have to be attractive as a man. You can just be good. I've never seen it really workout yet for a Female athlete.
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6568
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions

Post by JamesPhilips »

gilgamesh wrote: 12 Apr 2021, 17:03
JamesPhilips wrote: 12 Apr 2021, 17:00
gilgamesh wrote: 12 Apr 2021, 16:48

I'll tell ya what's sexist, but also true. There's never been a Heavyweight Female Boxing star, and never will be. Ya wanna know why? Because the only way a Female athlete in any sport pretty much ever gets popular is if she can be sold as a sex symbol. A Big Heavyweight Woman can't and won't be sold as a sex symbol in our lifetime, therefore she could only ever have a very minor audience at best.

Many of 'em in any weight class aren't exactly "Hot" but you notice that their publicity photos still try to make 'em look sexy as opposed to tough, because that's what sells.
Sex sells as Tyan Booth reminds us. Good point though.
You don't necessarily have to be attractive as a man. You can just be good. I've never seen it really workout yet for a Female athlete.
It's definitely a different culture women's sport and being attractive as a woman makes a big difference to your pay / sponsorships. But in women's Tennis there are plenty of unattractive women who are very respected. Navratilova. Graf. Williams.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28506
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions

Post by Coco »

While sex sells, the Aussie would never get invited back if she folded easily.
After her gutsy but limited performance I def reckon she will get a few shots back on Matchroom shows
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39337
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions

Post by margaret thatcher »

couldnt manage a win at the aussie ams, but will prob be a multi time world challenger in under 10 fights lol. that's women's pro boxing for you
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27508
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions

Post by stujones »

Both Bridges and Courtenay are a million times better than some of Christy Martin's opponents who fought for world titles.

It will develop organically, leave it as it is I think.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23088
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions

Post by mickey1975 »

Imagine telling a woman you think she should move down in weight.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39337
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions

Post by margaret thatcher »

stujones wrote: 13 Apr 2021, 06:45 Both Bridges and Courtenay are a million times better than some of Christy Martin's opponents who fought for world titles.

It will develop organically, leave it as it is I think.
in all of christy's fights she only fought 3 for world titles and lost 2 of them i think

bridges fighting for a title after 5-0.....she's like a female loma :lol:
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27508
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions

Post by stujones »

Were they not for titles? But generally she was considered....before rijker was on the scene, to be the best female boxer and some of her opponents were shocking
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39337
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Womens Boxing - The weight divisions

Post by margaret thatcher »

no most of them werent , she didnt win a title until almost the end of her career
Post Reply