Commentary

Nondescript · Post by **Nondescript** » 09 May 2021, 01:56

Did anyone feel like they were listening to a sky sports broadcast tonight with how biased the commentary was towards BJS?

Froch was the most reasonable one of the lot of them

Twinkle Toes · Post by **Twinkle Toes** » 09 May 2021, 02:17

Yes it was bad, very bad.

Monzon83 · Post by **Monzon83** » 09 May 2021, 02:18

Apparently Mannix had Saunders winning the fight. Either he knows nothing about boxing (which is probably likely) or he was watching a totally different fight.

maverick23 · Post by **maverick23** » 09 May 2021, 03:32

I thought they called the fight how the saw it and without bias. A couple of them went against the money fighter which is unusual.

The issue with Sky is they repeatedly go with the home fighter (bar Macklin).

There were lots of close rounds in the Canelo/BJS fight so it was open to interpretation. I had Canelo 1 up after 8.

margaret thatcher · Post by **margaret thatcher** » 09 May 2021, 03:33

ya they were bizarrely generous to bill, at least mannix and mora.

judges had the right scores for a change

DrDuke · Post by **DrDuke** » 09 May 2021, 04:21

Mannix is either intentionally biased or an idiot.

Ricky · Post by **Ricky** » 09 May 2021, 04:31

Was atrocious, bunch of clueless whiny americans who knew jack shìt about boxing.

Boxing Prospect · Post by **Boxing Prospect** » 09 May 2021, 04:47

DrDuke wrote: ↑09 May 2021, 04:21 Mannix is either intentionally biased or an idiot.

The latter.

Commentary

Commentary

Re: Commentary

Re: Commentary

Re: Commentary

Re: Commentary

Re: Commentary

Re: Commentary

Re: Commentary