Page 1 of 1
Commentary
Posted: 09 May 2021, 01:56
by Nondescript
Did anyone feel like they were listening to a sky sports broadcast tonight with how biased the commentary was towards BJS?
Froch was the most reasonable one of the lot of them
Re: Commentary
Posted: 09 May 2021, 02:17
by Twinkle Toes
Yes it was bad, very bad.
Re: Commentary
Posted: 09 May 2021, 02:18
by Monzon83
Apparently Mannix had Saunders winning the fight. Either he knows nothing about boxing (which is probably likely) or he was watching a totally different fight.
Re: Commentary
Posted: 09 May 2021, 03:32
by maverick23
I thought they called the fight how the saw it and without bias. A couple of them went against the money fighter which is unusual.
The issue with Sky is they repeatedly go with the home fighter (bar Macklin).
There were lots of close rounds in the Canelo/BJS fight so it was open to interpretation. I had Canelo 1 up after 8.
Re: Commentary
Posted: 09 May 2021, 03:33
by margaret thatcher
ya they were bizarrely generous to bill, at least mannix and mora.
judges had the right scores for a change
Re: Commentary
Posted: 09 May 2021, 04:21
by DrDuke
Mannix is either intentionally biased or an idiot.
Re: Commentary
Posted: 09 May 2021, 04:31
by Ricky
Was atrocious, bunch of clueless whiny americans who knew jack shìt about boxing.
Re: Commentary
Posted: 09 May 2021, 04:47
by Boxing Prospect
DrDuke wrote: ↑09 May 2021, 04:21
Mannix is either intentionally biased or an idiot.
The latter.