Is WBA Super Bantamweight Title vacant?
Is WBA Super Bantamweight Title vacant?
On Figs profile https://boxrec.com/en/proboxer/718399 one can see that WBA Super title is on boat in his next fight with Fulton. I wanna ask, if it`s redactors mistake or MJ(or WBA) has vacated the title?
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 101104
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Is WBA Super Bantamweight Title vacant?
He never had the SUPER belt.
He was regular champion.
The fight with Nery wasn’t a unification, because other orgs don’t consider the regular as a world title if there is a Super title. But now BoxRec are saying he’s the Super champion..
Looks like a Boxrec mistake.
He was regular champion.
The fight with Nery wasn’t a unification, because other orgs don’t consider the regular as a world title if there is a Super title. But now BoxRec are saying he’s the Super champion..
Looks like a Boxrec mistake.
Re: Is WBA Super Bantamweight Title vacant?
I wouldn't call it a boxrec mistake.
The wba has printed so many belts nobody can be expected to keep an accurate count of belts and title holders.
The wba has printed so many belts nobody can be expected to keep an accurate count of belts and title holders.
-
Boxing Prospect
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Is WBA Super Bantamweight Title vacant?
The WBA will now list him as a Unified champion in their rankings (see Froch and when Ward was Super champion, or Canelo when Floyd was super champion).
Re: Is WBA Super Bantamweight Title vacant?
Yeah, I know that Fig had never super title. Strange thing here is this ->> https://boxrec.com/en/title/43/Super%20BantamweightRuthless-RKO wrote: ↑16 May 2021, 09:27 He never had the SUPER belt.
He was regular champion.
The fight with Nery wasn’t a unification, because other orgs don’t consider the regular as a world title if there is a Super title. But now BoxRec are saying he’s the Super champion..
Looks like a Boxrec mistake.
Boxrec says the title is currently vacant, but on thw WBA official rankings https://www.wbaboxing.com/wba-ranking it's not
Re: Is WBA Super Bantamweight Title vacant?
I agree with the WBA's shit with this belts. But posting some title as a vacant without official infos from the Association can be called as a "mistake"