Hamed v Pedroza

Post Reply
Bodyshot3
Middleweight
Posts: 9791
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 15:19

Hamed v Pedroza

Post by Bodyshot3 »

Apologies if we have covered this one before.
But I do like this fight very much because it feels like fire meeting granite.

They're both prime.
It is a WBA featherweight title fight but on neutral turf - let's say Atlantic City or Monaco.
Crucially, Hamed is the challenger so must make the moves to unseat Pedroza.

Does Hamed run into trouble against a powerful, seasoned and hugely competent featherweight kingpin?
Or does he have too much speed, hard punches coming from odd places and confidence for Pedroza?
Noxy
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6824
Joined: 02 Jun 2013, 10:57

Re: Hamed v Pedroza

Post by Noxy »

Interesting, tough one to call. I think Pedroza on points. He was a lot taller than Hamed and I think he would use that to his advantage. I don’t think he‘d fall for Hamed‘s larger than life persona either.
Woldemar
Super Welterweight
Posts: 6284
Joined: 03 Jul 2014, 07:52

Re: Hamed v Pedroza

Post by Woldemar »

Pedroza by decision.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13875
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Hamed v Pedroza

Post by DrDuke »

Pedroza would confidently outbox Hamed, as he simply had more skills and accomplished more, while Hamed was only exercising his several physical talents on the lesser opposition, until he finally got schooled by a truly classy boxer.
giacomino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15513
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 19:33

Re: Hamed v Pedroza

Post by giacomino »

I think there are several featherweights in the past 40 years who would beat Pedroza, but Hamed isn't one of them. Pedroza would outbox him, hitting him in the ballsack a few times along the way for good measure. UD something like 7-5 or 8-4 if 12, 9-6 or 10-5 if 15
Switch hitter
Super Welterweight
Posts: 590
Joined: 09 Aug 2014, 07:43

Re: Hamed v Pedroza

Post by Switch hitter »

Was Pedroza that good ?
I always thought he was a bit overrated....... Hamed ( with Ingle )ko in about 5 or 6 rounds
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15683
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Hamed v Pedroza

Post by elmersalsa »

Switch hitter wrote: 11 Jun 2021, 04:56 Was Pedroza that good ?
I always thought he was a bit overrated....... Hamed ( with Ingle )ko in about 5 or 6 rounds
Eusebio Pedroza was one of the all-time great featherweight boxers and the MOST COMPLETE BOXER in my lifetime. He had all around skills. He could do it all.
Fray Bentos
Lightweight
Posts: 16813
Joined: 25 Dec 2017, 14:12

Re: Hamed v Pedroza

Post by Fray Bentos »

Switch hitter wrote: 11 Jun 2021, 04:56 Was Pedroza that good ?
I always thought he was a bit overrated....... Hamed ( with Ingle )ko in about 5 or 6 rounds
No chance...

Pedroza was a supreme boxer and was fornicating dirty - he would do a Barrera x 10 on Hamed and would stop him by the 12th.
Bodyshot3
Middleweight
Posts: 9791
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 15:19

Re: Hamed v Pedroza

Post by Bodyshot3 »

Thank you gents..........good conversation.

Hamed's confidence feels like a huge factor in all of this and especially as he is the challenger and has to push.

What I most remember about him was the self-belief and willingness to try things and assert himself.

But ultimately I think that is deeply dangerous against Perdroza who would heavily punish even minor mistakes or just get a forearm, shoulder or a good shove in and maybe man-handle Naz a bit.

I like the fight the other way round too.....how would Pedroza approach the fight as the challenger?
Post Reply