Poll : Does Tyson Fury career bores you to death ?

Boxtune · Post by **Boxtune** » 17 Aug 2021, 15:27

After wining decision and crying like a bitch because he even himself couldn't believe a win verdict against Klitchko
2015-11-28. Honestly how has fought apart from Wilder and he has fought ONCE every year against tomato cans.

He never fought other top 10 contenders. Klitchkos were giving 5-6 title fights away every year, so everyone could get a
chance at title. He took 2.5 years of nice excuse into hiding to escape rematch with Klitckho and it takes him 20 months to 3rd wilder rematch. To be honest i am not entertained at all ..It reminds me of years Holyfield three fight against John Ruiz.

Does anyone remember he was calling klitckos a Bitch !!!

Boxtune · Post by **Boxtune** » 18 Aug 2021, 05:26

Oh .. i forget to add but i think still not too late. Please English fans not vote .

gilgamesh · Post by **gilgamesh** » 18 Aug 2021, 05:38

He doesn't do much with his career that's for sure.

Boxtune · Post by **Boxtune** » 18 Aug 2021, 06:31

gilgamesh wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 05:38 He doesn't do much with his career that's for sure.

So true ..... By the time he fights wilder he will be 34, he is at his peak now, he should do 3-4 fights a year for next three years . Problem with Today champions think every fight is a risk, better not fight if don't have to.

candyslim · Post by **candyslim** » 18 Aug 2021, 08:19

Boxtune wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 06:31
gilgamesh wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 05:38 He doesn't do much with his career that's for sure.
So true ..... By the time he fights wilder he will be 34, he is at his peak now, he should do 3-4 fights a year for next three years . Problem with Today champions think every fight is a risk, better not fight if don't have to.

And then when you do get. a champion come along that tries to unify all the belts.and fights anybody and everybody that the governing bodies throw at him without complaint, you still manage to find a reason to hate him too.

555678 · Post by **555678** » 18 Aug 2021, 08:38

Yes, Fury is a big waste of talent, plagued by mental and drug issues, laziness, ducking AJ. He was a great solid one hit wonder (Klitschko win) but the rest has all been WWF BS.

Ruthless-RKO · Post by **Ruthless-RKO** » 18 Aug 2021, 08:49

555678 wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 08:38 Yes, Fury is a big waste of talent, plagued by mental and drug issues, laziness, ducking AJ. He was a great solid one hit wonder (Klitschko win) but the rest has all been WWF BS.

Not a one hit wonder, his win over Wilder was pretty impressive..
and technically should be 2-0

DrDuke · Post by **DrDuke** » 18 Aug 2021, 09:37

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 08:49
555678 wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 08:38 Yes, Fury is a big waste of talent, plagued by mental and drug issues, laziness, ducking AJ. He was a great solid one hit wonder (Klitschko win) but the rest has all been WWF BS.
Not a one hit wonder, his win over Wilder was pretty impressive..
and technically should be 2-0

That's a new anti-Fury troll, don't waste your time.

IRONFIST · Post by **IRONFIST** » 18 Aug 2021, 09:53

Utter tosh from the Fury haters. He put on a masterclass against WK, he was half expecting to get jobbed in Germany, he was jobbed by the yanks against Wilder in the first fight, second fight he mullered Wilder to take it out of the judges hands. Fury is the guvnor of the division.

Ruthless-RKO · Post by **Ruthless-RKO** » 18 Aug 2021, 10:21

DrDuke wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 09:37
Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 08:49
555678 wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 08:38 Yes, Fury is a big waste of talent, plagued by mental and drug issues, laziness, ducking AJ. He was a great solid one hit wonder (Klitschko win) but the rest has all been WWF BS.
Not a one hit wonder, his win over Wilder was pretty impressive..
and technically should be 2-0
That's a new anti-Fury troll, don't waste your time.

Yh I know. I know realised I replied to him after I did.

ironbeard · Post by **ironbeard** » 18 Aug 2021, 10:32

HW version of TCraw. Fathomless wastes of great talent.

Fury is NOT 2-0 v Wilder, and he does not deserve to be any more than Rigo deserved the W over Casimero last Saturday.

DrDuke · Post by **DrDuke** » 18 Aug 2021, 10:40

ironbeard wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 10:32 HW version of TCraw. Fathomless wastes of great talent.

Fury is NOT 2-0 v Wilder, and he does not deserve to be any more than Rigo deserved the W over Casimero last Saturday.

Nah, Fury did much better in the 1st Wilder fight and even in the Klitschko fight, than Rigo did against Casimero. With Fury it was possible to give him rounds clearly. In the Rigo-Casimero it was a 0-0 draw sh!tfest.

squiggy · Post by **squiggy** » 18 Aug 2021, 10:51

Has only lost 2 or 3 rounds to Wilder in the two fights combined.

Thomastearns · Post by **Thomastearns** » 18 Aug 2021, 11:27

squiggy wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 10:51 Has only lost 2 or 3 rounds to Wilder in the two fights combined.

But that's also the case for all of Deontay Wilders opponents, isn't it?

Luis Ortiz was giving Wilder a boxing lesson and won all of the rounds until he suddenly ran out of gas. Wilder needed some referee help just to survive.

The only difference with the much younger Fury was that he got back up and won the rematch.

Fury simply has an ugly ungainly style that is more awkward than anything else. Nowadays Fury relies heavily on his reflexes which may or may not be chemically enhanced.

The younger Tyson Fury was a far more entertaining fighter, no doubt.

ironbeard · Post by **ironbeard** » 18 Aug 2021, 12:21

DrDuke wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 10:40
ironbeard wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 10:32 HW version of TCraw. Fathomless wastes of great talent.

Fury is NOT 2-0 v Wilder, and he does not deserve to be any more than Rigo deserved the W over Casimero last Saturday.
Nah, Fury did much better in the 1st Wilder fight and even in the Klitschko fight, than Rigo did against Casimero. With Fury it was possible to give him rounds clearly. In the Rigo-Casimero it was a 0-0 draw sh!tfest.

Wilder did MUCH, MUCH better than Casimero did v Rigo.

DrDuke · Post by **DrDuke** » 18 Aug 2021, 12:31

ironbeard wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 12:21
DrDuke wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 10:40
ironbeard wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 10:32 HW version of TCraw. Fathomless wastes of great talent.

Fury is NOT 2-0 v Wilder, and he does not deserve to be any more than Rigo deserved the W over Casimero last Saturday.
Nah, Fury did much better in the 1st Wilder fight and even in the Klitschko fight, than Rigo did against Casimero. With Fury it was possible to give him rounds clearly. In the Rigo-Casimero it was a 0-0 draw sh!tfest.
Wilder did MUCH, MUCH better than Casimero did v Rigo.

Of course, those two both did close to literally nothing.

ironbeard · Post by **ironbeard** » 18 Aug 2021, 13:06

squiggy wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 10:51 Has only lost 2 or 3 rounds to Wilder in the two fights combined.

Keep repeating it, but it won’t be any more accurate.

Fury v Wilder I could have gone either way. I had it for Wilder, but I would not be whining about it years later if the decision had gone to the twice floored Fury.

Perkin Warbeck · Post by **Perkin Warbeck** » 18 Aug 2021, 14:14

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 08:49Not a one hit wonder, his win over Wilder was pretty impressive..
and technically should be 2-0

I think he should be 1-1 against Wilder. Any other referee would have stopped the fight, it seemed like a long count to me.

I agree with the opening post. Fury's career with the PED use, backing out of contracted rematches, obesity, and long periods of inactivity leaves a lot to be desired.

He's never defended a world title, not even once.

ironbeard · Post by **ironbeard** » 18 Aug 2021, 14:23

panchito wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 14:07
ironbeard wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 10:32 Fury is NOT 2-0 v Wilder
But the obvious point being made is that he SHOULD be 2-0

If scored correctly Fury won 9 rounds in the first go...factor in that 10-8 round for Wilder and you're looking at an 8-4 split.

Even if you called that 10-8 a 10-7 Fury still takes it. It a fact, weather you liked it or not mate.

It was a draw, “weather you liked it or not.” The difference is I admit that it was close and could have gone either way.

Onetimeonly · Post by **Onetimeonly** » 18 Aug 2021, 14:26

Laughable to call that a robbery. 3 jabs a clear round.

Noxy · Post by **Noxy** » 18 Aug 2021, 15:30

No, because he’s brilliant. An A1 fighter

ironbeard · Post by **ironbeard** » 18 Aug 2021, 18:32

panchito wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 14:31
ironbeard wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 14:23
panchito wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 14:07

But the obvious point being made is that he SHOULD be 2-0

If scored correctly Fury won 9 rounds in the first go...factor in that 10-8 round for Wilder and you're looking at an 8-4 split.

Even if you called that 10-8 a 10-7 Fury still takes it. It a fact, weather you liked it or not mate.

It was a draw, “weather you liked it or not.” The difference is I admit that it was close and could have gone either way.

Ok mate...once you put that crack pipe away you can explain the math on that one for us all.

It is not a popularity contest. And pulling out punch stats.

Fury is lucky he got out of the ring with a draw.

The ONLY math that matters is

115-111 Wilder
113-113
114-112 Fury

I agree with 115-111 Wilder, and acknowledge that it was a close fight that could have gone either way.

Fury has only himself to blame, same as Rigo last Saturday.

Bandog · Post by **Bandog** » 18 Aug 2021, 18:39

Never in my lifetime have I seen a ref begin to count when a boxer is lying flat on his back after getting floored a second time with his eyes closed. 1st fight should have been called a KO.

2nd fight, major damage done by an accidental but very obvious rabbit punch. Whatever, it was a good win for Fury. Shit happens.

If Fury would have aknowledged the rematch clause, we would already be done with the 3rd Wilder fight and Joshua. That's on him and his incompetant team.

margaret thatcher · Post by **margaret thatcher** » 18 Aug 2021, 18:40

Bandog wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 18:39 Never in my lifetime have I seen a ref begin to count when a boxer is lying flat on his back after getting floored a second time. 1st fight should have been called a KO.

2nd fight, major damage done by an accidental but very obvious rabbit punch. Whatever, it was a good win for Fury. Shit happens.

If Fury would have aknowledged the rematch clause, we would already be done with the 3rd Wilder fight and Joshua. That's on him and his incompetant team.

what happened to 'no excuses'

so fury actually got up in the first fight, but even knowing that you think the ref shouldve waved it off immediately, talk about butthurt LOL

margaret thatcher · Post by **margaret thatcher** » 18 Aug 2021, 18:42

ironbeard wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 18:32
panchito wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 14:31
ironbeard wrote: ↑18 Aug 2021, 14:23
It was a draw, “weather you liked it or not.” The difference is I admit that it was close and could have gone either way.

Ok mate...once you put that crack pipe away you can explain the math on that one for us all.

It is not a popularity contest. And pulling out punch stats.

Fury is lucky he got out of the ring with a draw.

The ONLY math that matters is

115-111 Wilder
113-113
114-112 Fury

I agree with 115-111 Wilder, and acknowledge that it was a close fight that could have gone either way.

Fury has only himself to blame, same as Rigo last Saturday.

close fight, either way, etc..........did you rewatch it and see it differently?

"Rd 12 = good night irene. Another Kd. Sick the eff down. No the fvck way Fury won this.

10-8 Wilder

116-110 Wilder""