2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Should we consider activity? Although some boxers still blame Covid and guy like Wallin it’s not really his fault he didn’t fight few months back.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑02 Jan 2022, 17:07 i considered sanchez higher, but hammer aint nothing at this level. hasnt even won a round vs anyone decent in years
Agree with that one.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑02 Jan 2022, 17:23 activity should be considered but adding a win over chris '89-100' hammer, also known as christian '107-120' cicocan, doesnt really add much from our last vote on frank
I'm down with this logic. Martin is a former world champ. A crap one, but a world champ regardless. I'd rather Pulev demoted than Ortiz.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑02 Jan 2022, 15:42I kinda like this.. because he’d only be going ahead of Pulev.
so what's your top 15 then my man?Enlightened-One wrote: ↑02 Jan 2022, 23:34 I normally refrain from commenting on this thread, but I can’t help thinking that some of the alleged top-15 heavyweights being rated by this forum is based on media reputation and fan hype, rather than their actual resumes and proverbial eyeball tests.
Anyway, I won’t submit another comment to this thread, since my thoughts oppose the echo chamber that people prefer to exist in.
I can’t give you an immediate answer, since I’ll need to think about it.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑02 Jan 2022, 23:35so what's your top 15 then my man?Enlightened-One wrote: ↑02 Jan 2022, 23:34 I normally refrain from commenting on this thread, but I can’t help thinking that some of the alleged top-15 heavyweights being rated by this forum is based on media reputation and fan hype, rather than their actual resumes and proverbial eyeball tests.
Anyway, I won’t submit another comment to this thread, since my thoughts oppose the echo chamber that people prefer to exist in.
There's plenty of decent points in there, but this ranking is based on results and not potential, dude. It's not perfect but it's pretty fair.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑02 Jan 2022, 23:52I can’t give you an immediate answer, since I’ll need to think about it.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑02 Jan 2022, 23:35so what's your top 15 then my man?Enlightened-One wrote: ↑02 Jan 2022, 23:34 I normally refrain from commenting on this thread, but I can’t help thinking that some of the alleged top-15 heavyweights being rated by this forum is based on media reputation and fan hype, rather than their actual resumes and proverbial eyeball tests.
Anyway, I won’t submit another comment to this thread, since my thoughts oppose the echo chamber that people prefer to exist in.
But I really can’t see any logical reason to rate Luis Ortiz, Frank Sanchez and Kubrat Pulev so highly.
Look at who these guys have beaten within the last three years, have they beaten any legitimate top-15 world-rated opponents?
Does anybody think that Dereck Chisora, Tony Yoka and Otto Wallin wouldn’t have had an excellent chance of beating this weekend’s iteration of Luis Ortiz?
I don’t know what to say, but I really do believe in expiry dates.
If a fighter hasn’t achieved anything noteworthy in the sport of boxing within the last three years, then we really should be endorsing other heavyweights that have recently achieved more.
Time doesn’t stand still.
I really do believe that today’s version of Luis Ortiz is tailor made for a durable heavy-handed busy heavyweight like Dereck Chisora, despite Del Boy appearing past-his-prime against Joe Parker.
And I think that Tony Yoka dominates Luis Ortiz.
Luis Ortiz also ducked the Otto Wallin fight.
I dont know if it means anything, but i absolutly agree with that pulev out propersition... or at least a propisition to vote on weather or not to remove pulev.CMCanavessi wrote: ↑03 Jan 2022, 00:06 Ortiz 9
Sanchez 13
And I want to nominate Pulev to get out of the list.