I have to say Eastman looks in fantastic shape, never seen him looking so ripped before - not that I can recall anyway althogh he's always in shape he's very cut this time. Won't be enough though!
Cheers mate He looks riped dosent he. Glad to see him not looking too intimidated aswell. Has anyone watched the video's on Hennessy's page. There is a real annoying guy shouting support to Howard in the backgrownd I think he is saying "and the new" and then something about Mike McCullum
Eastman has much longer arms too, hopkins must have bigger shoulders if his reach is bigger because eastman's clearly got longer arms.
Having saind that Eastman is about 2 inches shorter so the apparent length of his arms is extended because they go down further. Your right though they certainly do look impressive.
Anyone know the official height statistics? Both boxrec and BBC have 6'1 to Hopkins v Eastman's 5'11. Doesn't look like that to me. Mabye I'ts just the hats
jomothepure wrote:Anyone know the official height statistics? Both boxrec and BBC have 6'1 to Hopkins v Eastman's 5'11. Doesn't look like that to me. Mabye I'ts just the hats
Eastmans postur is better Nard is more hunced look at the back of his sholders.
Eastman has much longer arms too, hopkins must have bigger shoulders if his reach is bigger because eastman's clearly got longer arms.
Having saind that Eastman is about 2 inches shorter so the apparent length of his arms is extended because they go down further. Your right though they certainly do look impressive.
Look at the shoulders though, Eastman's shoulders are actually higher. A lot of Nard's extra height must be in that neck.