Ben went up in my estimations last night. I have never heard another promoter talk so directly into the camera about a decision and his disappointment with the officials. It's was Ben's show and it wasn't as if the home fighter had been f****d over but fair play to Ben. He emphasised his disappointment and the sour taste it left.
Good on you Ben.
Re: Ben Shalom
Posted: 27 Feb 2022, 05:23
by margaret thatcher
Good on Ben, but he's such a proven bullsh!tter, compulsive liar that I still can't warm to him yet
Re: Ben Shalom
Posted: 27 Feb 2022, 05:32
by Ezzard
Words are cheap.
If he's a boxing promoter he will want to protect his investments.
Re: Ben Shalom
Posted: 27 Feb 2022, 06:39
by maverick23
Yeah - it made me think better of Ben too.
However I’d wonder if he’d be the same if Josh was his fighter.
Re: Ben Shalom
Posted: 27 Feb 2022, 06:40
by Twinkle Toes
Don't get too excited, he talked the talk when he was out out of Taylor's ear shot, but when sat next to him he didn't say a word.
Not a word.
Re: Ben Shalom
Posted: 27 Feb 2022, 09:32
by Fightnight Scores
It was good what he said. And to be fair Hearn has at times come out and said that a decision was wrong, even when it was for his own fighter, albeit not in such strong terms as Ben did last night.
That being said, it's early days and Shalom needs to make a good impression to get people on board and on side as he builds his promotion up.
I think back to the early days of Eddie Hearn taking over matchroom boxing and he changed things up, gave us very good cards with great atmospheres and seemed to be taking (some) risks with his fighters, in comparison to Warren anyway.
But as he solidified his position as number 1, things began to change, he was more cautious and ultimately becomes a bit of a villain promoter amongst boxing fans just out to make as much money as possible off the back of his fighters.
Shalom is a young Eddie Hearn, a boxing fan.....but he'll morph in the savvy businessman in time.
Re: Ben Shalom
Posted: 27 Feb 2022, 09:57
by coneye
Fightnight Scores wrote: ↑27 Feb 2022, 09:32
It was good what he said. And to be fair Hearn has at times come out and said that a decision was wrong, even when it was for his own fighter, albeit not in such strong terms as Ben did last night.
That being said, it's early days and Shalom needs to make a good impression to get people on board and on side as he builds his promotion up.
I think back to the early days of Eddie Hearn taking over matchroom boxing and he changed things up, gave us very good cards with great atmospheres and seemed to be taking (some) risks with his fighters, in comparison to Warren anyway.
But as he solidified his position as number 1, things began to change, he was more cautious and ultimately becomes a bit of a villain promoter amongst boxing fans just out to make as much money as possible off the back of his fighters.
Shalom is a young Eddie Hearn, a boxing fan.....but he'll morph in the savvy businessman in time.
Definetly comes across to me has a car salesman , , Old ladys genuine 10,000 miles honest ,,, saying what he thinks you want to here ,, will he write a letter to the Bbbc saying he does'nt want them bent judges working on his shows ,, doubt it
Re: Ben Shalom
Posted: 27 Feb 2022, 19:16
by daz74
his previous companies now dissolved were called Scrumchies and Kool Catering. Can’t help but feel he’s winging it. Also, why does Savage Dan sit at the Press Conference table ?
Re: Ben Shalom
Posted: 27 Feb 2022, 19:30
by jameswilson
I can’t read his name without hearing Tyan Booth say ‘Ben Shlong’ 20 times over in my head.
Re: Ben Shalom
Posted: 27 Feb 2022, 19:38
by KiwiRider
He talked the talk, and will probably do nothing.
He will not write to the board.
He will not ban those two judges from doing his shows. Or referee duties. Expect to see one or both at his next show.
Re: Ben Shalom
Posted: 27 Feb 2022, 21:24
by margaret thatcher
ben is a total massive bullshitter, joe fournier levels. too bad that huge thread on him on checkhookboxing, that had loads of corroborating evidence, got deleted
he pulled off a great con job to get this position, keep that in mind whenever you think some new honest kid is on the block
Re: Ben Shalom
Posted: 28 Feb 2022, 05:45
by Ruthless-RKO
jameswilson wrote: ↑27 Feb 2022, 19:30
I can’t read his name without hearing Tyan Booth say ‘Ben Shlong’ 20 times over in my head.
Thanks for that..
Re: Ben Shalom
Posted: 15 Nov 2022, 10:06
by Ruthless-RKO
He’s going live
Re: Ben Shalom
Posted: 15 Nov 2022, 10:16
by bripez
margaret thatcher wrote: ↑27 Feb 2022, 21:24
he pulled off a great con job to get this position, keep that in mind whenever you think some new honest kid is on the block
What's his background?
How does somebody in their 20's become CEO of a boxing promotion company that suddenly gets a contract with Sky ?
Looking on companies house he was also director of 4 very small businesses, all of which are either dissolved or struck-off.
Re: Ben Shalom
Posted: 15 Nov 2022, 10:35
by CaptainSpacerod
margaret thatcher wrote: ↑27 Feb 2022, 21:24
ben is a total massive bullshitter, joe fournier levels. too bad that huge thread on him on checkhookboxing, that had loads of corroborating evidence, got deleted
he pulled off a great con job to get this position, keep that in mind whenever you think some new honest kid is on the block
Ben did a Frank move and got the lawyers involved to delete it ?
Can you repeat any of it here Maggie ?
Can we even refer to him as Ben anymore
Re: Ben Shalom
Posted: 15 Nov 2022, 10:43
by Maxi_
Ben is allegedly from a very rich and powerful Jewish family. He had a huge loan to set Boxxer up from an unknown source. A few suggested it was Kinahan but who knows.
Nobody goes from 'running club nights at University' to getting the exclusive boxing rights of the country's biggest platform without some dodgy dealings.
Re: Ben Shalom
Posted: 15 Nov 2022, 11:26
by CaptainSpacerod
I’m not sure why his family’s ethnicity is relevant. I think they have a bathroom company which may have made them reasonably well off but I don’t think selling their fair share of bathroom fixtures and fittings makes them rich and powerful.
The Kinahan link is plausible though, how else would Macklin still have such a prominent role on Sky when there are so many other co comms who don’t have the dark shadow of links to gangland thugs hanging over them
Re: Ben Shalom
Posted: 15 Nov 2022, 12:00
by Ruthless-RKO
CaptainSpacerod wrote: ↑15 Nov 2022, 11:26
I’m not sure why his family’s ethnicity is relevant. I think they have a bathroom company which may have made them reasonably well off but I don’t think selling their fair share of bathroom fixtures and fittings makes them rich and powerful.
The Kinahan link is plausible though, how else would Macklin still have such a prominent role on Sky when there are so many other co comms who don’t have the dark shadow of links to gangland thugs hanging over them
Shalom first got involved in the Ultimate Boxxer series song side a couple of boxers. Crolla was one, I think Hatton was in there too. Got a contract with Channel 5 as well.. it was a good starting point.
Re: Ben Shalom
Posted: 16 Nov 2022, 09:53
by Ruthless-RKO
Re: Ben Shalom
Posted: 16 Nov 2022, 10:15
by Spud
Dont know why just dont like him or trust him.
Re: Ben Shalom
Posted: 16 Nov 2022, 10:36
by keithmoonhangover
Spud wrote: ↑16 Nov 2022, 10:15
Dont know why just dont like him or trust him.
x2
Re: Ben Shalom
Posted: 16 Nov 2022, 11:10
by cormack
margaret thatcher wrote: ↑27 Feb 2022, 05:23
Good on Ben, but he's such a proven bullsh!tter, compulsive liar that I still can't warm to him yet
so what you are saying is he is well qualified to be a promoter .
Re: Ben Shalom
Posted: 16 Nov 2022, 11:17
by TheLeprechaun
John Docherty had a lot to say about him. All of it extremely negative.
Re: Ben Shalom
Posted: 16 Nov 2022, 11:19
by Counter-puncher
'#askben': FFS
the promoters are part of the story nowadays
there's no decent fucken fights, but the promoters talk a good game and they're very active on social media.....
boxing is fvcked.
Re: Ben Shalom
Posted: 16 Nov 2022, 11:51
by Maxi_
CaptainSpacerod wrote: ↑15 Nov 2022, 11:26
I’m not sure why his family’s ethnicity is relevant. I think they have a bathroom company which may have made them reasonably well off but I don’t think selling their fair share of bathroom fixtures and fittings makes them rich and powerful.
The Kinahan link is plausible though, how else would Macklin still have such a prominent role on Sky when there are so many other co comms who don’t have the dark shadow of links to gangland thugs hanging over them
His parents are top end lawyers.
There was an IFL interview (since deleted) where he said he was meeting an advisor in the Middle East who was instrumental in getting him into boxing and was advising him.