Nathan Cleverly

[big lennox]

Does anyone know what he is up to these days? Is he still involved in Boxing? An underrated fighter in my humble opinion.

[Spud]

https://www.worldboxingnews.net/2022/01 ... worry/amp/

[Ruthless-RKO]

But of history

viewtopic.php?f=9&t=244473&hilit=Nathan

[stujones]

Very underrated IMO. Yes, I used to question his pathway to the top at times - must be one of the only champions who won all his belts (except his last championship) in a vacant title fight. However, there a not many fighters we can say with confidence he was truly world class - Clev was one and the fact he has been forgotten about largely shows how underrated he is - compare his fame with that of Bellew's post career.

Seemed such a down to earth and mature / settled guy out of the ring when he was fighting. I did worry (as I did with Naz) about how much pressure he put on himself though with being undefeated.

[big lennox]

Thanks for these links. That is sad news. I noted that Gavin Rees, Joe Calzaghe, Gary Locket, Bradley Pryce and Enzo Mac are all still involved in boxing in some shape or form, but wondered if Cleverely is as well. He doesn't seem to be on ifltv interviews etc.

But, I hope he is well and gets the help he needs, if it is needed. Cleverely always struck me as being a good guy. What a stable of fighters Enzo Calzaghe had back in the day.

Spud, it is great to have you back posting on here again.

[Spud]

Thanks for these links. That is sad news. I noted that Gavin Rees, Joe Calzaghe, Gary Locket, Bradley Pryce and Enzo Mac are all still involved in boxing in some shape or form, but wondered if Cleverely is as well. He doesn't seem to be on ifltv interviews etc.

But, I hope he is well and gets the help he needs, if it is needed. Cleverely always struck me as being a good guy. What a stable of fighters Enzo Calzaghe had back in the day.

Spud, it is great to have you back posting on here again.

Thank you pal

[TheLeprechaun]

Underrated? He was very basic, just one style to him.

[polecateddy]

Seemed at his best in his uni days. As soon as he became a full-time pro he seemed to lose his touch.

[TheLeprechaun]

Seemed at his best in his uni days. As soon as he became a full-time pro he seemed to lose his touch.

Increase in opposition.

A very limited fighter.

[margaret thatcher]

good career for sure, won at almost all the levels. excellent conditioning but too easy to hit + a bit lacking in firepower at the highest level

[forcefraser]

Isn't he off his.bonce on ecstasy pipe these days?

Seems to post some pretty deluded stuff on twitter

[Ezzard]

I thought he was quality. High volume. I think what held him back was his defence. He wasn't a huge puncher and his big output always meant he would take some coming back. I always thought if he could have improved his defence he would have had even more success.

I was so pleased for him when he beat Brahmer.

[forcefraser]

I thought he was quality. High volume. I think what held him back was his defence. He wasn't a huge puncher and his big output always meant he would take some coming back. I always thought if he could have improved his defence ore he would have had even more success.

I was so pleased for him when he beat Brahmer.

He was ok up to a certain level. That fight with Fonfara showed us what we needed to know about Nathan's level.

Best win? Murat?

[Ezzard]

I thought he was quality. High volume. I think what held him back was his defence. He wasn't a huge puncher and his big output always meant he would take some coming back. I always thought if he could have improved his defence ore he would have had even more success.

I was so pleased for him when he beat Brahmer.

He was ok up to a certain level. That fight with Fonfara showed us what we needed to know about Nathan's level.

Best win? Murat?

Didn't the Fonfara fight break some compubox record for punches thrown and landed in a fight? He competed with him. He lost. But he was competitive enough for me to think he was at that level.

[margaret thatcher]

wins over bellew, brahmer, and murat are decent. the fonfara fight was very competitive

[margaret thatcher]

funny enough looking back, clev was favoured here over kov : viewtopic.php?f=9&t=169898&p=3692464&hilit=

hoppy was also favoured here over kov

and the ward predictions were 70 percent 'ward totally schools him, not close at all'

this forum have a weird thing against kov lol?

etc...

I think Clev will show him up on Sat night.

Clev to win wide on points, big overhand rights pinging off Kovalev's head all night.

I've been watching Kov over the last few years and think this has Calzaghe/Lacy written all over it.

Kovalev isn't the monster many are making him out to be. He's heavy-handed but he's certainly not the Eurasian Julian Jackson. He can box but he steams straight in & smothers his work.

Clev by decision.

All the talk about how rubbish Cleverlys' opponents have been are quiet about just who Kovalev has beaten to get a title shot, Campillo aside; I think Nathan will keep him turning for 3 rounds then put the work rate on him and run out on points.

I can see Clev coasting to a wide points decision.

Im backing Nathan and I'm quietly confident if he sticks to his plan of using his skill, speed and stamina he can not only win but stop Kovalev mid to late.

[Ruthless-RKO]

Doesn’t he have a math degree as well?

[Ruthless-RKO]

funny enough looking back, clev was favoured here over kov : viewtopic.php?f=9&t=169898&p=3692464&hilit=

hoppy was also favoured here over kov

and the ward predictions were 70 percent 'ward totally schools him, not close at all'

this forum have a weird thing against kov lol?

etc...

I think Clev will show him up on Sat night.

Clev to win wide on points, big overhand rights pinging off Kovalev's head all night.

I've been watching Kov over the last few years and think this has Calzaghe/Lacy written all over it.

Kovalev isn't the monster many are making him out to be. He's heavy-handed but he's certainly not the Eurasian Julian Jackson. He can box but he steams straight in & smothers his work.

Clev by decision.

All the talk about how rubbish Cleverlys' opponents have been are quiet about just who Kovalev has beaten to get a title shot, Campillo aside; I think Nathan will keep him turning for 3 rounds then put the work rate on him and run out on points.

I can see Clev coasting to a wide points decision.

Im backing Nathan and I'm quietly confident if he sticks to his plan of using his skill, speed and stamina he can not only win but stop Kovalev mid to late.

Kovalev wasn’t really known was he? Especially to UK fan base.

Casuals probably thought he was crap and the hardcores must have really rated Clev.

[margaret thatcher]

could be, though weird that hopkins was favoured over him here too.....kov didnt lose a round in either fight

at what point did ppl finally realize he could actually box a bit?

[forcefraser]

I thought he was quality. High volume. I think what held him back was his defence. He wasn't a huge puncher and his big output always meant he would take some coming back. I always thought if he could have improved his defence ore he would have had even more success.

I was so pleased for him when he beat Brahmer.

He was ok up to a certain level. That fight with Fonfara showed us what we needed to know about Nathan's level.

Best win? Murat?

Didn't the Fonfara fight break some compubox record for punches thrown and landed in a fight? He competed with him. He lost. But he was competitive enough for me to think he was at that level.

Fully agree, the Fonfara fight was competitive and Cleverly showed a great chin and a huge set og cajones in the fight.

My point was more that Fonfara was no hall of famer myself.

Bellew was like a skeleton at light heavy and Brahmer retired injured.

[Boxerbeetle]

funny enough looking back, clev was favoured here over kov : viewtopic.php?f=9&t=169898&p=3692464&hilit=

hoppy was also favoured here over kov

and the ward predictions were 70 percent 'ward totally schools him, not close at all'

this forum have a weird thing against kov lol?

etc...

I think Clev will show him up on Sat night.

Clev to win wide on points, big overhand rights pinging off Kovalev's head all night.

I've been watching Kov over the last few years and think this has Calzaghe/Lacy written all over it.

Kovalev isn't the monster many are making him out to be. He's heavy-handed but he's certainly not the Eurasian Julian Jackson. He can box but he steams straight in & smothers his work.

Clev by decision.

All the talk about how rubbish Cleverlys' opponents have been are quiet about just who Kovalev has beaten to get a title shot, Campillo aside; I think Nathan will keep him turning for 3 rounds then put the work rate on him and run out on points.

I can see Clev coasting to a wide points decision.

Im backing Nathan and I'm quietly confident if he sticks to his plan of using his skill, speed and stamina he can not only win but stop Kovalev mid to late.

I didn’t post on that thread for some reason, even though I had tickets to the fight. I honestly don’t remember who I backed, but remember I was never as sold on Kov as many people, always thought he looked a bit fragile. Clearly not fragile enough for Clev though

[The_Don1]

funny enough looking back, clev was favoured here over kov : viewtopic.php?f=9&t=169898&p=3692464&hilit=

hoppy was also favoured here over kov

and the ward predictions were 70 percent 'ward totally schools him, not close at all'

this forum have a weird thing against kov lol?

etc...

I think Clev will show him up on Sat night.

Clev to win wide on points, big overhand rights pinging off Kovalev's head all night.

I've been watching Kov over the last few years and think this has Calzaghe/Lacy written all over it.

Kovalev isn't the monster many are making him out to be. He's heavy-handed but he's certainly not the Eurasian Julian Jackson. He can box but he steams straight in & smothers his work.

Clev by decision.

All the talk about how rubbish Cleverlys' opponents have been are quiet about just who Kovalev has beaten to get a title shot, Campillo aside; I think Nathan will keep him turning for 3 rounds then put the work rate on him and run out on points.

I can see Clev coasting to a wide points decision.

Im backing Nathan and I'm quietly confident if he sticks to his plan of using his skill, speed and stamina he can not only win but stop Kovalev mid to late.

This jogs my memory now, I distinctly recall my boxrec account being hacked around this time and I was glad the lads at boxrec were able to resolve it for me.

[The Gratest]

funny enough looking back, clev was favoured here over kov : viewtopic.php?f=9&t=169898&p=3692464&hilit=

hoppy was also favoured here over kov

and the ward predictions were 70 percent 'ward totally schools him, not close at all'

this forum have a weird thing against kov lol?

etc...

I think Clev will show him up on Sat night.

Clev to win wide on points, big overhand rights pinging off Kovalev's head all night.

I've been watching Kov over the last few years and think this has Calzaghe/Lacy written all over it.

Kovalev isn't the monster many are making him out to be. He's heavy-handed but he's certainly not the Eurasian Julian Jackson. He can box but he steams straight in & smothers his work.

Clev by decision.

All the talk about how rubbish Cleverlys' opponents have been are quiet about just who Kovalev has beaten to get a title shot, Campillo aside; I think Nathan will keep him turning for 3 rounds then put the work rate on him and run out on points.

I can see Clev coasting to a wide points decision.

Im backing Nathan and I'm quietly confident if he sticks to his plan of using his skill, speed and stamina he can not only win but stop Kovalev mid to late.

Thanks for that EO

[margaret thatcher]

[Deserter]

funny enough looking back, clev was favoured here over kov : viewtopic.php?f=9&t=169898&p=3692464&hilit=

hoppy was also favoured here over kov

and the ward predictions were 70 percent 'ward totally schools him, not close at all'

this forum have a weird thing against kov lol?

etc...

I think Clev will show him up on Sat night.

Clev to win wide on points, big overhand rights pinging off Kovalev's head all night.

I've been watching Kov over the last few years and think this has Calzaghe/Lacy written all over it.

Kovalev isn't the monster many are making him out to be. He's heavy-handed but he's certainly not the Eurasian Julian Jackson. He can box but he steams straight in & smothers his work.

Clev by decision.

All the talk about how rubbish Cleverlys' opponents have been are quiet about just who Kovalev has beaten to get a title shot, Campillo aside; I think Nathan will keep him turning for 3 rounds then put the work rate on him and run out on points.

I can see Clev coasting to a wide points decision.

Im backing Nathan and I'm quietly confident if he sticks to his plan of using his skill, speed and stamina he can not only win but stop Kovalev mid to late.

This jogs my memory now, I distinctly recall my boxrec account being hacked around this time and I was glad the lads at boxrec were able to resolve it for me.