All the information that was readily available is gone. No weight, record in previous fights, dates, titles on the line, etc. Hard to believe this got signed off on, but zero chance they go back.
Congrats, you guys fucked a good thing up that I've been using for well over a decade, no problem with only praise, no complaints
The mobile update is awful.
Re: The mobile update is awful.
The update is not only for the mobile version but also for the web version.
I agree that there are a bunch of missing datas at the moment (button leading to events, ratings, weights...), but since it is a very recent version (less than a week) and since the data provided seem to change with time (weight were present a few hours ago, I had no nick when I published messages two days ago and now it is back in the forum ; ratings have been missing (even on the ratings page) since the new version), I think they are at the moment trying to fix everything and that, the sooner possible, we will have access to the datas as previously with only a new design.
I am just a bit surprised no communication has been done regarding the fact a new version of the site was launched and that there should be a few inconvenience temporarily until everything is stabilized
I agree that there are a bunch of missing datas at the moment (button leading to events, ratings, weights...), but since it is a very recent version (less than a week) and since the data provided seem to change with time (weight were present a few hours ago, I had no nick when I published messages two days ago and now it is back in the forum ; ratings have been missing (even on the ratings page) since the new version), I think they are at the moment trying to fix everything and that, the sooner possible, we will have access to the datas as previously with only a new design.
I am just a bit surprised no communication has been done regarding the fact a new version of the site was launched and that there should be a few inconvenience temporarily until everything is stabilized
Re: The mobile update is awful.
Hey
I've just logged onto the forum to have a moan about this update.
As someone with red / green colour blindness I can't tell who won a fight anymore.
I've just logged onto the forum to have a moan about this update.
As someone with red / green colour blindness I can't tell who won a fight anymore.
Re: The mobile update is awful.
I thought it was a temporary problem being currently fixed but since it has not changed in a few days and that there is still no communication from the site about this restyling, I fear it is maybe definitive. I confirm I am a bit disappointed since a bunch of informations are now gone ("event" button to access to the full event and see the other fights of a card instantly, ratings (now we only have rankings, very valuable information but not the same level of detail), numbers of KO...). I am not colorblind, but the restyling of the presentation of the results (it is not written W or L or D for Win Lose Draw but has to be deducted from the color) is also a change I didn't anticipate. I do not see the point of this changes, and can't say at the moment that it has improved my use of the site.aumonier2 wrote: ↑20 Jul 2022, 14:12 The update is not only for the mobile version but also for the web version.
I agree that there are a bunch of missing datas at the moment (button leading to events, ratings, weights...), but since it is a very recent version (less than a week) and since the data provided seem to change with time (weight were present a few hours ago, I had no nick when I published messages two days ago and now it is back in the forum ; ratings have been missing (even on the ratings page) since the new version), I think they are at the moment trying to fix everything and that, the sooner possible, we will have access to the datas as previously with only a new design.
I am just a bit surprised no communication has been done regarding the fact a new version of the site was launched and that there should be a few inconvenience temporarily until everything is stabilized
Re: The mobile update is awful.
I agree, the changes are not good for several reasons.
I really hope it is a temporary situation.
I really hope it is a temporary situation.
Re: The mobile update is awful.
I use to be able to follow as many boxers as i want.
Now we are limited to 10? I feel like if it ain't broke don't fix it.
This is sad and even the fight updates are slow. I'm not sure if this is because of this update but the site is confusing too.
I'm talking on desktop.
Sad cause this was the only play i went for boxing records.
Please allow me to follow however many boxers i want again.

Now we are limited to 10? I feel like if it ain't broke don't fix it.
This is sad and even the fight updates are slow. I'm not sure if this is because of this update but the site is confusing too.
I'm talking on desktop.
Sad cause this was the only play i went for boxing records.
Please allow me to follow however many boxers i want again.
Re: The mobile update is awful.
I have to agree with the general consensus that the changes are a net negative, but particularly the decision to limit followed boxers to 10.
That's absolutely insane, and completely destroys the entire purpose of the follow function. Please reconsider some of these decisions.
That's absolutely insane, and completely destroys the entire purpose of the follow function. Please reconsider some of these decisions.
Re: The mobile update is awful.
Please fix this.
Everthing is worse than before.
Everthing is worse than before.
Re: The mobile update is awful.
Can you please put the number of KOs of boxers? I cannot see them in this new version of the web? Thank you.
Re: The mobile update is awful.
Hard to believe there is no communication from the site about the current restyling. I say current because, even though it has been launched more than one and a half months ago, it is still evolving and changing. For example the detailed fight cards with average points from fan cards are back, after been reported missing since the new version was online, and that was done this week. So it seems they are still trying to solve problems and find solutions to the remarks we do on this forum.
So there may be hope that someday the ratings of the boxers (not the ranking 1-5 stars but the ratings, .001 to 751.4) will be back. More important, the rating (or ranking) at the time of a fight may be featured again someday (now if we look at an old fight, all we can see is the current rating of the fighter ; Canelo Saul Alvarez is ranked #1 in every fights, as if he was already number one when he fought guys like Ivan Illescas and Jesus Abel Hernandez back in 2007).
I am still very puzzled by the fact the site admin do absolutely no communication about tye restyling, as if they take no care of the site users. I don't pretend they must explain publicly their decisions, they do what have to be done to rule their site, but they are reading and taking care of some of the remarks we do, but don't communicate so it looks, from the ppint where I look, as if the site is not done for the web but for specialists, since the changes are not done in the interest of common users.
So there may be hope that someday the ratings of the boxers (not the ranking 1-5 stars but the ratings, .001 to 751.4) will be back. More important, the rating (or ranking) at the time of a fight may be featured again someday (now if we look at an old fight, all we can see is the current rating of the fighter ; Canelo Saul Alvarez is ranked #1 in every fights, as if he was already number one when he fought guys like Ivan Illescas and Jesus Abel Hernandez back in 2007).
I am still very puzzled by the fact the site admin do absolutely no communication about tye restyling, as if they take no care of the site users. I don't pretend they must explain publicly their decisions, they do what have to be done to rule their site, but they are reading and taking care of some of the remarks we do, but don't communicate so it looks, from the ppint where I look, as if the site is not done for the web but for specialists, since the changes are not done in the interest of common users.
