Page 1 of 3

RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 09 Nov 2022, 12:12
by keithmoonhangover
Which lineal heavyweight champions do you think he would beat?

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 09 Nov 2022, 12:30
by Teddy's Toupee
Sullivan, Corbett, Fitzsimmons, Jefferies, Hart, Burns, Willard, Dempsey, Schemling, Sharkey, Carnera, Braddock, Johansson, Spinks(Leon), Muhammad Ali(3), Rahman.

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 09 Nov 2022, 15:21
by SteveO
None

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 09 Nov 2022, 15:29
by Ezzard
Hart, Burns, Carnera... Those are his best and only chances.

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 09 Nov 2022, 15:32
by margaret thatcher
beats a lot of the earliest champs

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 09 Nov 2022, 15:33
by margaret thatcher
Ezzard wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 15:29 Hart, Burns, Carnera... Those are his best and only chances.
no chance against soaking weight 165 pound bob fitz? willard? neon leon? rahman?

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 09 Nov 2022, 15:42
by keithmoonhangover
Teddy's Toupee wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 12:30 Dempsey,
Is nothing sacred, brother? If you put Jones in a time machine back to the 1919, with no PEDs, a simple diet, the hot sun and Dempey with his killer instinct, I don't think Roy could cope.

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 09 Nov 2022, 15:45
by margaret thatcher
are we talking about the roy jones who actually existed, or a fictional one we make various changes to based on the era his opponent fought

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 09 Nov 2022, 16:11
by keithmoonhangover
margaret thatcher wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 15:45 are we talking about the roy jones who actually existed, or a fictional one we make various changes to based on the era his opponent fought
The Jones that fought Ruiz. :TU:

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 09 Nov 2022, 16:22
by Teddy's Toupee
keithmoonhangover wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 16:11
margaret thatcher wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 15:45 are we talking about the roy jones who actually existed, or a fictional one we make various changes to based on the era his opponent fought
The Jones that fought Ruiz. :TU:
Beats Dempsey.

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 09 Nov 2022, 16:23
by keithmoonhangover
Teddy's Toupee wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 16:22
keithmoonhangover wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 16:11
margaret thatcher wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 15:45 are we talking about the roy jones who actually existed, or a fictional one we make various changes to based on the era his opponent fought
The Jones that fought Ruiz. :TU:
Beats Dempsey.
:shame:

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 09 Nov 2022, 17:59
by Ezzard
margaret thatcher wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 15:33
Ezzard wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 15:29 Hart, Burns, Carnera... Those are his best and only chances.
no chance against soaking weight 165 pound bob fitz? willard? neon leon? rahman?
Without the juice Fitz sparks him. Maybe even with the juice. Don't see Jones going 45 rounds with Willard. Rahman needs just one right hand.,

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 09 Nov 2022, 18:01
by Ezzard
Dempsey is way too much for him.

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 09 Nov 2022, 18:51
by Wee Tommy
margaret thatcher wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 15:45 are we talking about the roy jones who actually existed, or a fictional one we make various changes to based on the era his opponent fought
🤣👍🏼

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 09 Nov 2022, 22:51
by DrDuke
He would beat the majority of fighters up to the Dempsey times. Jack would have a too good delivery of his huge power, so it's a bad matchup for Roy.

Then he could deal with the mix of champs between Tunney and Louis. Although Baer would also have a solid puncher's chance.

In the later times he would beat Leon Spinks and Shannon Briggs, maybe also Michael Spinks and George Foreman of the 90s (if not got caught).

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 10 Nov 2022, 06:28
by keithmoonhangover
Teddy's Toupee wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 16:22
keithmoonhangover wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 16:11
margaret thatcher wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 15:45 are we talking about the roy jones who actually existed, or a fictional one we make various changes to based on the era his opponent fought
The Jones that fought Ruiz. :TU:
Beats Dempsey.
What about Dempsey on juice, now that is a scary thought.

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 10 Nov 2022, 08:23
by DrDuke
keithmoonhangover wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 06:28
Teddy's Toupee wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 16:22
keithmoonhangover wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 16:11

The Jones that fought Ruiz. :TU:
Beats Dempsey.
What about Dempsey on juice, now that is a scary thought.
Mike Tyson.

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 10 Nov 2022, 10:27
by Teddy's Toupee
keithmoonhangover wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 06:28
Teddy's Toupee wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 16:22
keithmoonhangover wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 16:11

The Jones that fought Ruiz. :TU:
Beats Dempsey.
What about Dempsey on juice, now that is a scary thought.
Makes no difference. He defence was just too crude to compete with more modern boxers. He'd get outboxed and probably stopped by every lineal heavyweight champ after and including Joe Louis.

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 10 Nov 2022, 10:54
by keithmoonhangover
Teddy's Toupee wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 10:27
keithmoonhangover wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 06:28
Teddy's Toupee wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 16:22

Beats Dempsey.
What about Dempsey on juice, now that is a scary thought.
Makes no difference. He defence was just too crude to compete with more modern boxers. He'd get outboxed and probably stopped by every lineal heavyweight champ after and including Joe Louis.
He decked the highly skilled Gene Tunney, so he would be in with the slicksters. I would pick him over Charles, Walcott, Marciano, Patterson, Ingo, Neon Leon and Rahman. I would even give him a shot against Fury, if Wilder the Windmill could knock him down numerous time, there's no reason Jack couldn't and if it was before the eight count, he would put Fury down permanently.

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 10 Nov 2022, 11:03
by Teddy's Toupee
keithmoonhangover wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 10:54
Teddy's Toupee wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 10:27
keithmoonhangover wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 06:28

What about Dempsey on juice, now that is a scary thought.
Makes no difference. He defence was just too crude to compete with more modern boxers. He'd get outboxed and probably stopped by every lineal heavyweight champ after and including Joe Louis.
He decked the highly skilled Gene Tunney, so he would be in with the slicksters. I would pick him over Charles, Walcott, Marciano, Patterson, Ingo, Neon Leon and Rahman. I would even give him a shot against Fury, if Wilder the Windmill could knock him down numerous time, there's no reason Jack couldn't and if it was before the eight count, he would put Fury down permanently.
Tunney wasn't highly skilled, he was just one of the first old-timers to utilise effectively that modern day staple the jab.

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 10 Nov 2022, 11:13
by Ezzard
If Dempsey's left hook missed Jones the breeze from the shot would drop Roy.

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 10 Nov 2022, 11:21
by Teddy's Toupee
Ezzard wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 11:13 If Dempsey's left hook missed Jones the breeze from the shot would drop Roy.
No it woudn't.

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 10 Nov 2022, 12:15
by Ambling Alp II
Teddy's Toupee wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 11:03
keithmoonhangover wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 10:54
Teddy's Toupee wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 10:27
Makes no difference. He defence was just too crude to compete with more modern boxers. He'd get outboxed and probably stopped by every lineal heavyweight champ after and including Joe Louis.
He decked the highly skilled Gene Tunney, so he would be in with the slicksters. I would pick him over Charles, Walcott, Marciano, Patterson, Ingo, Neon Leon and Rahman. I would even give him a shot against Fury, if Wilder the Windmill could knock him down numerous time, there's no reason Jack couldn't and if it was before the eight count, he would put Fury down permanently.
Tunney wasn't highly skilled, he was just one of the first old-timers to utilise effectively that modern day staple the jab.
You have to be kidding.

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 10 Nov 2022, 12:44
by Teddy's Toupee
Ambling Alp II wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 12:15
Teddy's Toupee wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 11:03
keithmoonhangover wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 10:54

He decked the highly skilled Gene Tunney, so he would be in with the slicksters. I would pick him over Charles, Walcott, Marciano, Patterson, Ingo, Neon Leon and Rahman. I would even give him a shot against Fury, if Wilder the Windmill could knock him down numerous time, there's no reason Jack couldn't and if it was before the eight count, he would put Fury down permanently.
Tunney wasn't highly skilled, he was just one of the first old-timers to utilise effectively that modern day staple the jab.
You have to be kidding.
No.

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Posted: 10 Nov 2022, 12:54
by keithmoonhangover
Teddy's Toupee wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 11:03
keithmoonhangover wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 10:54
Teddy's Toupee wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 10:27
Makes no difference. He defence was just too crude to compete with more modern boxers. He'd get outboxed and probably stopped by every lineal heavyweight champ after and including Joe Louis.
He decked the highly skilled Gene Tunney, so he would be in with the slicksters. I would pick him over Charles, Walcott, Marciano, Patterson, Ingo, Neon Leon and Rahman. I would even give him a shot against Fury, if Wilder the Windmill could knock him down numerous time, there's no reason Jack couldn't and if it was before the eight count, he would put Fury down permanently.
Tunney wasn't highly skilled, he was just one of the first old-timers to utilise effectively that modern day staple the jab.
Ha'way man Teddy. Tunney was the consummate boxer.