Joe Louis vs. Jimmy Bivins (1947)

Post Reply
1108788
Super Flyweight
Posts: 7
Joined: 04 Oct 2022, 12:59

Joe Louis vs. Jimmy Bivins (1947)

Post by 1108788 »

What if, instead of defending his title against Walcott, Louis defended it against Jimmy Bivins? Bivins was arguably the best heavyweight of the war period, and won the duration title in 1942. Could Bivins have beaten Louis?
Nile4000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7195
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 15:21

Re: Joe Louis vs. Jimmy Bivins (1947)

Post by Nile4000 »

A couple of years earlier he would have had a decent shot, no doubt. Shame really that Bivins never got a world title shot.
klompton
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2738
Joined: 07 Jul 2003, 02:27

Re: Joe Louis vs. Jimmy Bivins (1947)

Post by klompton »

No. He was way too small. He ran from a far more shot Louis all night when they finally did meet. He was never beating Louis.
Nile4000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7195
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 15:21

Re: Joe Louis vs. Jimmy Bivins (1947)

Post by Nile4000 »

Bivins had shot his best shot when he fought Joe. It they had met at the proper time, and Bivins reach was equal, there may have been some surprises.
klompton
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2738
Joined: 07 Jul 2003, 02:27

Re: Joe Louis vs. Jimmy Bivins (1947)

Post by klompton »

Louis was way more shot when they met than Bivins and when he was at his best he was way better than Bivins ever was.
goose 5
Super Featherweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 12 Sep 2018, 20:20

Re: Joe Louis vs. Jimmy Bivins (1947)

Post by goose 5 »

Have you seen Bivins-Lloyd Marshall-I read the entire fight exists on film.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15185
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Joe Louis vs. Jimmy Bivins (1947)

Post by Ambling Alp II »

don't think Bivins would have won at that point either. However, he probably would have made it interesting for a while. He certainly deserved a title shot. He was actually the #1 challenger in 1943. If it wasn't for WWII, he may have got a title shot.
riderc
Light Flyweight
Posts: 4
Joined: 11 Jan 2025, 10:16

Re: Joe Louis vs. Jimmy Bivins (1947)

Post by riderc »

Could someone please explain what the 'Duration' title is? Cannot find any info. Ta
evrenb
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3410
Joined: 16 Feb 2013, 09:47

Re: Joe Louis vs. Jimmy Bivins (1947)

Post by evrenb »

1876037 wrote: 20 Jan 2025, 06:28 Could someone please explain what the 'Duration' title is? Cannot find any info. Ta
Assuming you are human and not AI. The duration title was like an interim title during WW2. Where champions like for example Joe Louis , had their titles 'frozen' while they assisted in the war effort. It was a temporary thing that ran for a couple of years.
riderc
Light Flyweight
Posts: 4
Joined: 11 Jan 2025, 10:16

Re: Joe Louis vs. Jimmy Bivins (1947)

Post by riderc »

Hello, I am indeed Human, though the wife may disagree.
I can find nothing online about this at all, but what an interesting thing. I was just curious as usually you can click on the title and BOXREC will give you other champions, but this had no link and no other info.
Thank you very much for this, I shall continue the research.
evrenb
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3410
Joined: 16 Feb 2013, 09:47

Re: Joe Louis vs. Jimmy Bivins (1947)

Post by evrenb »

riderc wrote: 20 Jan 2025, 07:57 Hello, I am indeed Human, though the wife may disagree.
I can find nothing online about this at all, but what an interesting thing. I was just curious as usually you can click on the title and BOXREC will give you other champions, but this had no link and no other info.
Thank you very much for this, I shall continue the research.
I think a lot of the 'Duration' title malarkey was more marketing by promoters to 'sell' a fight. A bit like we have endless titles now...mostly worthless from a historical perspective. But it keeps the gravy train rolling!!
riderc
Light Flyweight
Posts: 4
Joined: 11 Jan 2025, 10:16

Re: Joe Louis vs. Jimmy Bivins (1947)

Post by riderc »

I thought maybe it was like 'Interim', or Silver champion, those silly titles boxers fight for when the main champ is otherwise engaged. With Louis at war, guess this was a better option than stripping him of the title.

Very interesting though, love little historic nuggets like this
Post Reply