Page 1 of 1
Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 27 Jun 2023, 23:22
by Redback Rasta
Bellow continues to make noise about how, at 40, he could beat Rosanski.
What is the motivation for this? Just making a headline? Has he blown his earnings already? Do you think he is serious about a comeback?
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 28 Jun 2023, 00:45
by margaret thatcher
rosanksi always does better than people expect, the polish briderweight great is more effective than he looks
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 28 Jun 2023, 02:02
by tonyevs
Bellew trying to stay relevant now Eddie's star is dimming.
Bellew was very very fortunate to win a world title belt, and face such a worn out David Hate.
He'd do a Fury if Rosanski offered him the opportunity - 70% split and for the fight to be in his nans garden.
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 28 Jun 2023, 03:15
by leejonesjnr
I don’t think Bellew has any intention of boxing Rosanski, he just likes a bit of attention from iFL and the like.
He might end up doing an exhibition now that they are gathering popularity but nothing proper.
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 28 Jun 2023, 07:27
by HomicideHenry
Bridgerweight is such a farcical division that Bellew might stand a chance at winning because most of the guys there suck at cruiser and heavy. These are glorified journeymen and trialhorses being hyped up to be something more than what they are.
Then again I'm not so sure somebody can be gone for more than three years with no tune ups and win a title, no matter how ridiculous the division is. The only person I know to have pulled it off was Vitali Klitschko.
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 28 Jun 2023, 07:59
by emallini
Rosanski stops him
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 28 Jun 2023, 08:01
by Spud
I hope it doesn’t happen, fot the same reasons as so many have highlighted already.
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 28 Jun 2023, 10:32
by jameswilson
By the time he is ready to fight Rozanski will have lost to his mandatory.
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 28 Jun 2023, 12:01
by oogiebe
You could've just left this as, "Is Bellow Serious About fighting?"
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 28 Jun 2023, 14:29
by cormack
tonyevs wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 02:02
Bellew trying to stay relevant now Eddie's star is dimming.
Bellew was very very fortunate to win a world title belt, and face such a worn out David Hate.
He'd do a Fury if Rosanski offered him the opportunity - 70% split and for the fight to be in his nans garden.
I wouldnt say he was fortunate as that was a hell of a scrap .
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 28 Jun 2023, 15:53
by Teddy's Toupee
HomicideHenry wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 07:27
Bridgerweight is such a farcical division that Bellew might stand a chance at winning because most of the guys there suck at cruiser and heavy. These are glorified journeymen and trialhorses being hyped up to be something more than what they are.
Then again I'm not so sure somebody can be gone for more than three years with no tune ups and win a title, no matter how ridiculous the division is. The only person I know to have pulled it off was Vitali Klitschko.
Ray Leonard. Call yourself a boxing pundit?
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 28 Jun 2023, 18:27
by Redback Rasta
Boxing is full of unwise comebacks and this has the look of one. Disappointing too that Hearn seems to be encouraging it rather than discouraging it.
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 28 Jun 2023, 19:10
by HomicideHenry
Teddy's Toupee wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 15:53
HomicideHenry wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 07:27
Bridgerweight is such a farcical division that Bellew might stand a chance at winning because most of the guys there suck at cruiser and heavy. These are glorified journeymen and trialhorses being hyped up to be something more than what they are.
Then again I'm not so sure somebody can be gone for more than three years with no tune ups and win a title, no matter how ridiculous the division is. The only person I know to have pulled it off was Vitali Klitschko.
Ray Leonard. Call yourself a boxing pundit?
I said more than 3 years.
Between Kevin Howard and Marvin Hagler was a timeframe of 2 years and 10 months and 26 days.
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 28 Jun 2023, 19:48
by jameswilson
HomicideHenry wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 19:10
Teddy's Toupee wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 15:53
HomicideHenry wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 07:27
Bridgerweight is such a farcical division that Bellew might stand a chance at winning because most of the guys there suck at cruiser and heavy. These are glorified journeymen and trialhorses being hyped up to be something more than what they are.
Then again I'm not so sure somebody can be gone for more than three years with no tune ups and win a title, no matter how ridiculous the division is. The only person I know to have pulled it off was Vitali Klitschko.
Ray Leonard. Call yourself a boxing pundit?
I said more than 3 years.
Between Kevin Howard and Marvin Hagler was a timeframe of 2 years and 10 months and 26 days.
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 28 Jun 2023, 21:08
by coneye
Would'nt be suprised one little bit if he comes back , would imagine Hearn is pissing in his ear big time , he needs headline fighters , simple has that , I think Hearn and think , Oh how the mighty have fallen
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 29 Jun 2023, 03:14
by leejonesjnr
coneye wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 21:08
Would'nt be suprised one little bit if he comes back , would imagine Hearn is pissing in his ear big time , he needs headline fighters , simple has that , I think Hearn and think , Oh how the mighty have fallen
Bellew isnt a big seller is he?
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 29 Jun 2023, 03:32
by joshj909
margaret thatcher wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 00:45
rosanksi always does better than people expect, the polish briderweight great is more effective than he looks
Yep, there's something about him. Looks physically awful, has an awful fighting style, always expected to lose, always gets the KO. He won't get to the very top but he's weirdly effective against the chinny limited guys. Think I'd actually favour him to KO Bellew.
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 29 Jun 2023, 03:36
by chinarich
The chance of becoming a two weight world champion (even at a joke weight which only one organisation recognises) might be irresistible for someone who likes talking about himself as much as Bellew does...
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 29 Jun 2023, 03:38
by margaret thatcher
ya i agree, would favour rosanski to ko him
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 29 Jun 2023, 05:28
by Ezzard
Hope TB stays retired and enjoys his health, wealth and family. He doesn't need to pick up pennies on the M25.
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 29 Jun 2023, 08:52
by Teddy's Toupee
jameswilson wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 19:48
HomicideHenry wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 19:10
Teddy's Toupee wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 15:53
Ray Leonard. Call yourself a boxing pundit?
I said more than 3 years.
Between Kevin Howard and Marvin Hagler was a timeframe of 2 years and 10 months and 26 days.
Can't argue with facts. In my defence I posted from memory, whereas Homi no doubt scoured the BoxRec database to come up with the exact years, months and days.
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 29 Jun 2023, 10:08
by watsupdoc87
Teddy's Toupee wrote: ↑29 Jun 2023, 08:52
jameswilson wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 19:48
HomicideHenry wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 19:10
I said more than 3 years.
Between Kevin Howard and Marvin Hagler was a timeframe of 2 years and 10 months and 26 days.
Can't argue with facts. In my defence I posted from memory, whereas Homi no doubt scoured the BoxRec database to come up with the exact years, months and days.
Hang your fukin head in shame you were 1 month and 5 days off. Tut tut
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 29 Jun 2023, 10:21
by Teddy's Toupee
watsupdoc87 wrote: ↑29 Jun 2023, 10:08
Teddy's Toupee wrote: ↑29 Jun 2023, 08:52
Can't argue with facts. In my defence I posted from memory, whereas Homi no doubt scoured the BoxRec database to come up with the exact years, months and days.
Hang your fukin head in shame you were 1 month and 5 days off. Tut tut
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 29 Jun 2023, 10:44
by Ezzard
Leonard is a once in a lifetime guy. Not really evidence that a normal human could do it.
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Posted: 03 Jul 2023, 06:33
by Ruthless-RKO
So the WBC would accept Bellew as a challenger for Rosanski..