Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
-
Redback Rasta
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 2907
- Joined: 19 Jul 2015, 18:53
Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Bellow continues to make noise about how, at 40, he could beat Rosanski.
What is the motivation for this? Just making a headline? Has he blown his earnings already? Do you think he is serious about a comeback?
What is the motivation for this? Just making a headline? Has he blown his earnings already? Do you think he is serious about a comeback?
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39328
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
rosanksi always does better than people expect, the polish briderweight great is more effective than he looks 
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Bellew trying to stay relevant now Eddie's star is dimming.
Bellew was very very fortunate to win a world title belt, and face such a worn out David Hate.
He'd do a Fury if Rosanski offered him the opportunity - 70% split and for the fight to be in his nans garden.
Bellew was very very fortunate to win a world title belt, and face such a worn out David Hate.
He'd do a Fury if Rosanski offered him the opportunity - 70% split and for the fight to be in his nans garden.
-
leejonesjnr
- Middleweight
- Posts: 2667
- Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
I don’t think Bellew has any intention of boxing Rosanski, he just likes a bit of attention from iFL and the like.
He might end up doing an exhibition now that they are gathering popularity but nothing proper.
He might end up doing an exhibition now that they are gathering popularity but nothing proper.
-
HomicideHenry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 18722
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Bridgerweight is such a farcical division that Bellew might stand a chance at winning because most of the guys there suck at cruiser and heavy. These are glorified journeymen and trialhorses being hyped up to be something more than what they are.
Then again I'm not so sure somebody can be gone for more than three years with no tune ups and win a title, no matter how ridiculous the division is. The only person I know to have pulled it off was Vitali Klitschko.
Then again I'm not so sure somebody can be gone for more than three years with no tune ups and win a title, no matter how ridiculous the division is. The only person I know to have pulled it off was Vitali Klitschko.
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Rosanski stops him
-
Spud
- Heavyweight

Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
I hope it doesn’t happen, fot the same reasons as so many have highlighted already.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13411
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
By the time he is ready to fight Rozanski will have lost to his mandatory.
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
You could've just left this as, "Is Bellow Serious About fighting?"
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
I wouldnt say he was fortunate as that was a hell of a scrap .tonyevs wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 02:02 Bellew trying to stay relevant now Eddie's star is dimming.
Bellew was very very fortunate to win a world title belt, and face such a worn out David Hate.
He'd do a Fury if Rosanski offered him the opportunity - 70% split and for the fight to be in his nans garden.
-
Teddy's Toupee
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2903
- Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Ray Leonard. Call yourself a boxing pundit?HomicideHenry wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 07:27 Bridgerweight is such a farcical division that Bellew might stand a chance at winning because most of the guys there suck at cruiser and heavy. These are glorified journeymen and trialhorses being hyped up to be something more than what they are.
Then again I'm not so sure somebody can be gone for more than three years with no tune ups and win a title, no matter how ridiculous the division is. The only person I know to have pulled it off was Vitali Klitschko.
-
Redback Rasta
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 2907
- Joined: 19 Jul 2015, 18:53
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Boxing is full of unwise comebacks and this has the look of one. Disappointing too that Hearn seems to be encouraging it rather than discouraging it.
-
HomicideHenry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 18722
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
I said more than 3 years.Teddy's Toupee wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 15:53Ray Leonard. Call yourself a boxing pundit?HomicideHenry wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 07:27 Bridgerweight is such a farcical division that Bellew might stand a chance at winning because most of the guys there suck at cruiser and heavy. These are glorified journeymen and trialhorses being hyped up to be something more than what they are.
Then again I'm not so sure somebody can be gone for more than three years with no tune ups and win a title, no matter how ridiculous the division is. The only person I know to have pulled it off was Vitali Klitschko.
Between Kevin Howard and Marvin Hagler was a timeframe of 2 years and 10 months and 26 days.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13411
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
HomicideHenry wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 19:10I said more than 3 years.Teddy's Toupee wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 15:53Ray Leonard. Call yourself a boxing pundit?HomicideHenry wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 07:27 Bridgerweight is such a farcical division that Bellew might stand a chance at winning because most of the guys there suck at cruiser and heavy. These are glorified journeymen and trialhorses being hyped up to be something more than what they are.
Then again I'm not so sure somebody can be gone for more than three years with no tune ups and win a title, no matter how ridiculous the division is. The only person I know to have pulled it off was Vitali Klitschko.
Between Kevin Howard and Marvin Hagler was a timeframe of 2 years and 10 months and 26 days.
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Would'nt be suprised one little bit if he comes back , would imagine Hearn is pissing in his ear big time , he needs headline fighters , simple has that , I think Hearn and think , Oh how the mighty have fallen
-
leejonesjnr
- Middleweight
- Posts: 2667
- Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Yep, there's something about him. Looks physically awful, has an awful fighting style, always expected to lose, always gets the KO. He won't get to the very top but he's weirdly effective against the chinny limited guys. Think I'd actually favour him to KO Bellew.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 00:45 rosanksi always does better than people expect, the polish briderweight great is more effective than he looks![]()
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
The chance of becoming a two weight world champion (even at a joke weight which only one organisation recognises) might be irresistible for someone who likes talking about himself as much as Bellew does...
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39328
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
ya i agree, would favour rosanski to ko him
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Hope TB stays retired and enjoys his health, wealth and family. He doesn't need to pick up pennies on the M25.
-
Teddy's Toupee
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2903
- Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Can't argue with facts. In my defence I posted from memory, whereas Homi no doubt scoured the BoxRec database to come up with the exact years, months and days.jameswilson wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 19:48HomicideHenry wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 19:10I said more than 3 years.
Between Kevin Howard and Marvin Hagler was a timeframe of 2 years and 10 months and 26 days.![]()
-
watsupdoc87
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 14:16
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Hang your fukin head in shame you were 1 month and 5 days off. Tut tutTeddy's Toupee wrote: ↑29 Jun 2023, 08:52Can't argue with facts. In my defence I posted from memory, whereas Homi no doubt scoured the BoxRec database to come up with the exact years, months and days.jameswilson wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 19:48HomicideHenry wrote: ↑28 Jun 2023, 19:10
I said more than 3 years.
Between Kevin Howard and Marvin Hagler was a timeframe of 2 years and 10 months and 26 days.![]()
-
Teddy's Toupee
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2903
- Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
watsupdoc87 wrote: ↑29 Jun 2023, 10:08Hang your fukin head in shame you were 1 month and 5 days off. Tut tutTeddy's Toupee wrote: ↑29 Jun 2023, 08:52Can't argue with facts. In my defence I posted from memory, whereas Homi no doubt scoured the BoxRec database to come up with the exact years, months and days.![]()
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
Leonard is a once in a lifetime guy. Not really evidence that a normal human could do it.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 103019
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Is Bellew serious about fighting Lucasz Rosanski at bridgerweight?
So the WBC would accept Bellew as a challenger for Rosanski..