Amir Khan

Post Reply
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Amir Khan

Post by Spud »

How good was Amir Khan?

Was he a P4P fighter?

Hatton or Khan?

Has Amir ruined his legacy by fighting Canelo and his last fight with Brook ?

Has the alledged drugs tedt failure ruined his career?
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 102997
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Amir Khan

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

He could box for sure and his speed helped.

He was doing really well against Canelo.

I feel after that, he took some time off and from there he declined more.

Don’t blame him for the Caneo bout.

He was chasing big money fights for a few years leading up to that especially with FMJ. He never gave it him, so he took on Canelo instead.

You take what you can in the business.

Legacy is one thing, but it’s a business too. It’s about making money.

We all know Khan’s money issues. It’s been documented many times.

He rinsed whatever paydays he could have before fighting Brook.
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: Amir Khan

Post by BigDoofus »

si7dog7
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1009
Joined: 26 Feb 2013, 14:42

Re: Amir Khan

Post by si7dog7 »

BigDoofus wrote: 27 Aug 2023, 08:01
Khan’s taken many low shots with his phone Doofy. Just like you’re doing on every thread with anti Usyk hence pro Fury nonsense.

Anyways. Back to the subject.

P4P. No.
Good World champ and elite? Yes. (Maidana fight a stand out).
Great for British Boxing ? Yes. He opened many doors and made money for lots of people (pre-AH)

The drug fail though. Leaves a bad stain on any legacy he might have had. People will always ask now. Was he on it from the start?

Shame.
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Amir Khan

Post by polecateddy »

Better as an amateur than a professional. The Craig Watson amateur fight did expose a frailty that never really went away. Definitely peaked in the Maidana fight. The handspeed was out of this world, but the power was average and the chin fairly poor. But on his day a decent world champion, who needed to be matched carefully to get the best out of him. Great against Kotelnik. Nice last amateur fight against the ageing Mario Kindelán.
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Amir Khan

Post by Spud »

What about khan v hatton

How would that have gone?
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Amir Khan

Post by polecateddy »

Peak Hatton probably would have done a number on him. Possibly even to the extent of how Hatton manhandled Stephen Smith.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32914
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Amir Khan

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Not sure Khan was ever in P4P top 10, his chin was just too awful. Usually in good exciting fights though, and sought out top opposition, so lots of credit to him for that.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16851
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Amir Khan

Post by Nightmare Roy »

Very good fighter who took on the best, the Maindana win has aged very well and it was a cracker of a fight.
rob h
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 610
Joined: 15 Dec 2006, 08:36

Re: Amir Khan

Post by rob h »

Never took to him, but you can't knock his balls. Went and gave it a go with everyone. Boxed superbly against Alvarez before the killer blow. Super fast in his prime and never in a boring fight.

With regards to Hatton - he was alright, just very well matched and extremely overrated. Not really thought much about what would happen if they fought. They were never at the same level at the same time. I personally think Hatton would struggle with the speed and aggression. I'll admit he looked the part knocking over the likes of an ancient Freddie Pendleton, John Bailey and Stephen Smith though. Kostya was done by the time they fought.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13411
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Amir Khan

Post by jameswilson »

I don't know if I'll ever see another British boxer whos as fast as he was.

Maidana round 1 was pure class.

He also cracked America.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28489
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Amir Khan

Post by Coco »

Big balls, put bums on seats, lighting fast
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45234
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Amir Khan

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Good career, very good fighter, a ways short of greatness, brave, and made the most of his significant physical gifts.

Sadly, he was also as thick as a bucketful of tripe, and had the ring iq of a weeble, almost always lost once hurt as he tended to go for broke as he lacked the savvy or instincts to survive and adapt.
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: Amir Khan

Post by BigDoofus »

Coco wrote: 04 Sep 2023, 18:26 Big balls, put bums on seats, lighting fast
He did quit against Crawford after a punch on the leg.
Post Reply